CData API Server vs. IBM API Connect

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CData API Server
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
CData's API Server enables users to create APIs from existing enterprise data. Users cna hook up any SQL or NoSQL database and the API Server generates what the vendor states will be flexible, comprehensive, and fully documented APIs.
$2,499
per year
IBM API Connect
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
IBM API Connect is a scalable API solution that helps organizations implement a robust API strategy by creating, exposing, managing and monetizing an entire API ecosystem across multiple clouds. As businesses embrace their digital transformation journey, APIs become critical to unlock the value of business data and assets. With increasing adoption of APIs, consistency and governance are needed across the enterprise. API Connect aims to help businesses…N/A
Pricing
CData API ServerIBM API Connect
Editions & Modules
Standard
$2,499
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CData API ServerIBM API Connect
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CData API ServerIBM API Connect
Considered Both Products
CData API Server

No answer on this topic

IBM API Connect
Chose IBM API Connect
IBM API Connect can in some use cases, especially when customer requirements are highly security centric, provide a more robust approach to managing access, performance, and trust, in the IT estate. In many cases it boils down to customer preference and to some extent if the …
Chose IBM API Connect
I think it could be improved but overall it is very good.

Creo que podria mejorarse pero en general es muy bueno.
Chose IBM API Connect
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and Apigee Edge
Chose IBM API Connect
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Chose IBM API Connect
In our organization, we chose IBM API Connect for the easy integration
Chose IBM API Connect
Our organization chose IBM API Connect because, in our experience, IBM is more resilient
Chose IBM API Connect
Apigee Edge and Kong Konnect
Chose IBM API Connect
Our decision to adopt IBM API Connect was driven by its comprehensive end-to-end API lifecycle management, which proved to be exceptionally well-suited to our B2B, Open Banking, and multi-fintech integration requirements. When compared with other solutions, API Connect stood …
Chose IBM API Connect
Ease of use of the product and pricing of the product.
Chose IBM API Connect
Prior to adopting IBM API Connect, there were two main competitors, MuleSoft. Although in the integration capabilities MuleSoft seemed to have an advantage, and regarding developer experience, IBM API Connect had a set of enterprise features for the API management.
Chose IBM API Connect
Mulesoft seemed to take a lot longer to implement and reach any real ROI attribution. For the other competitors, I'd say they are easier to administrate, but this isn't as important to us as a business user. It was easier to explore APIs with IBM than it was with others.
Chose IBM API Connect
From a cost perspective, IBM is more convenient and has a broader portfolio of features, which results in a better tool.
Chose IBM API Connect
There were multiple product we read and then shortlist were taken as POC against IBM API Connect.
-Google Apigee : is good but in cross cloud there are concerns. Also, feature of reading & identifying the target system certificate was not available there.
Chose IBM API Connect
It was organizational boundaries to use IBM API Connect but we have learnt so many think on this technology. Obviously, We have more experience on this it;s easy for us to configure and maintain the system.
Chose IBM API Connect
Its depend on the business use case. Sometime we have to got through the in deep to technologies so we can;t use such built-in kind of services.
Chose IBM API Connect
IBM API Connect have more feature compared to other solutions like from one platform we can create APIs on the API Manager, we can publish the APIs to the products/portal server, we can secure the APIs using IBM DataPower Gateway, we can socalize the APIs using developer …
Chose IBM API Connect
We choice IBM API Connect because Apigee is more manual when you create an API Proxy
Chose IBM API Connect
We use IBM Cloud, which works well with our hybrid cloud deployment. As a large firm, we are able to scale as required once the initial setup is complete.
Chose IBM API Connect
Never used any product of the IBM environment together.
Chose IBM API Connect
IBM API Connect is more flexible and easy to use. It has a lot of features that differ in the market like API monetization & analytics.
Features
CData API ServerIBM API Connect
API Management
Comparison of API Management features of Product A and Product B
CData API Server
-
Ratings
IBM API Connect
8.4
Ratings
0% below category average
API access control00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Rate limits and usage policies00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
API usage data00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
API user onboarding00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
API versioning00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Usage billing and payments00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
API monitoring and logging00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CData API ServerIBM API Connect
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CData API ServerIBM API Connect
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CData API ServerIBM API Connect
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
Overall, it can be stated that IBM API Connect has many benefits and can easily manage complicated integrations. The platform performs best in large environments, especially where microservices and processing of multiple API dependencies are required. On average, we have processed thousands of API calls within a second with good response time.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • API discovery feature is very helpful to allow us to scope the work required before diving into things.
  • The ability to set permissions and rulesets at a user level is essential to restrict access to specific datasets.
  • Ability for external users (those from outside our organisation) to leverage the API in more restrictive manner.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • That being stated, every thing you own will have both positive and negative aspects to its use. It can be perplexing at times, particularly when navigating between different functions.
  • However, based on my usage of this application up until this point, I've discovered that the only time it lags is when it's downloading updates. Otherwise, it's excellent to utilise for all other customs.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
IBM API Connect may be less appropriate for small-scale projects with minimal API management requirements, where simpler and more cost-effective solutions suffice. Organizations lacking the necessary technical expertise or resources to harness its full potential may face implementation challenges. In static environments with infrequent API changes or limited developer engagement, the platform's comprehensive features may be excessive for the task at hand.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Our decision to adopt IBM API Connect was driven by its comprehensive end-to-end API lifecycle management, which proved to be exceptionally well-suited to our B2B, Open Banking, and multi-fintech integration requirements. When compared with other solutions, API Connect stood out for its ability to externalize and govern APIs at scale, while offering enterprise-grade capabilities critical for our regulated environment. IBM App Connect serves as our internal integration middleware, focused on backend orchestration and data transformation. IBM watsonx acts as a complementary AI and data platform for exposing intelligent services especially with the code assistant functionality, it is API Connect that provides the crucial layer for external API exposure, management, and monetization. IBM DataPower is an incredibly secure and performant runtime, and lacks key enterprise features such as developer engagement, full API governance, and analytics. API Connect fills that gap seamlessly, offering a unified, secure, and scalable API management experience.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • It has decreased the average development time of an API by 15%.
  • It has simplified the monitoring and tracking of development, keeping it simple and in one place.
  • It has reduced the time wasted looking for information; it has reduced the mail loop sharing status and questions.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM API Connect Screenshots

Screenshot of API tests and insightsScreenshot of API Manager customization interfaceScreenshot of the API designer