Cegid Talent (based on technology from the former Technomedia, acquired by Cegid in 2016), allows users to manage candidates recruiting, training, performance, compensation, career development and succession. Its business intelligence tools help identify organizational potential in order to drive HR strategies, from the cloud.
N/A
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
Score5 out of 10
N/A
The PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform is a talent management platform designed for Higher Education and Government organizations, now from PowerSchool (acquired August, 2018). Modules include analytics, applicant tracking, position management, onboarding, records management, and performance management.
N/A
Pricing
Cegid Talent
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cegid Talent
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Cegid Talent
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Cegid Talent and PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
Feature
Cegid Talent
3.3
1 Ratings
75% below category average
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
7.7
8 Ratings
6% above category average
New hire portal
3.01 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
4.01 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
3.01 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Cegid Talent and PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
Feature
Cegid Talent
3.0
1 Ratings
78% below category average
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
2.7
3 Ratings
87% below category average
Manager note taking
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance plans
00 Ratings
4.02 Ratings
Plan weighting
00 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
00 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
Review status tracking
00 Ratings
4.03 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
00 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
Review reminders
00 Ratings
4.02 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
00 Ratings
1.02 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
00 Ratings
4.02 Ratings
Reporting
00 Ratings
1.03 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Cegid Talent and PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
Feature
Cegid Talent
2.0
1 Ratings
109% below category average
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
7.3
4 Ratings
7% above category average
Create succession plans/pools
2.01 Ratings
6.33 Ratings
Candidate search
2.01 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Candidate ranking
00 Ratings
7.04 Ratings
Candidate development
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Cegid Talent and PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
Feature
Cegid Talent
3.5
1 Ratings
68% below category average
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
7.3
3 Ratings
3% above category average
Job Requisition Management
6.01 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Company Website Posting
5.01 Ratings
7.22 Ratings
Customized Application Form
4.01 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Resume Management
6.01 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
5.01 Ratings
2.72 Ratings
Candidate Search
2.01 Ratings
7.92 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
5.01 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Collaboration
1.01 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation
2.01 Ratings
7.12 Ratings
Email Templates
5.01 Ratings
7.82 Ratings
User Permissions
1.01 Ratings
8.42 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
3.01 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Reporting
1.01 Ratings
8.62 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
00 Ratings
7.12 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
00 Ratings
8.12 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Cegid Talent and PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
Recruiting and human resources is a good use for this tool. To some degree, reporting is fairly appropriate as well, unless you want super detailed reports, then I would say no. Anything related to managing candidate flow and making the recruitment process easier is where this tool is best used, upgrades need to be made so it's more useful in other areas before rolling out.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Organizations who have very few applications and/or very few positions posted are probably less likely to benefit as high from PeopleAdmin. Large organizations who have several positions and/or several applications/applicants can definitely benefit from this product. This product is not as well suited for performance management as I had hoped because there is not a lot of freedom to creating and designing different evaluations for different position types in the system when you have an organization that has thousands of different employees and types.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The commands and controls are fairly user friendly. This is a positive because as recruiters we don't want to waste time having to learn odd or awkward controls, we just want to intuitively click.
The original implementation process was fairly seamless according to industry standards. This made for a smoother rollout, testing, and implementation phase. We didn't waste too much time with overly complicated technical issues, etc.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Applicant tracking was a good use of this tool for our department. I think it could use a few more customization features but overall it was a good tool to weed out applicants who were not qualified for the position.
The system has some canned reporting tools that also worked well for our department and management needs.
It was a great place to house our position descriptions and provided a readily accessible source for hiring managers to make requested updates and changes and for employees to see and have access to their position descriptions.
The reporting function needs to be vastly improved. You can run the most basic reports, but if you want to get more granular it requires customization, extra fees, and involving a developer. This piece should be made easier.
The lag time between load screens, clicking new screens, etc. was very slow at times. We don't believe this was a connectivity issue, rather something on Technomedia's end.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
PeopleAdmin's internal report writer needs work. Currently, in version 7, reporting can only be done requisition number by requisition number. The report writer needs to be modified so it can create reports enterprise-wide.
PeopleAdmin's Data Mart product needs substantial modification. In version 5.8, on a monthly basis, PeopleAdmin provided us with an Microsoft Access database containing our historical data up to that period end. In version 7, the "Data Mart" contains our historical data. The Data Mart consists of over 300 files. These files are not database table downloads nor is it parts of a database data dump. Rather, the files appear to be scrapes from html pages. They contain html codes and other character data that needs to be cleaned before they can be uploaded. The files are not in a table-by-table format. Any one file can contain data from two or more tables. The format of the Data Mart makes it difficult to load the data into a database and format it in a table structure that is comparable to the Access database provided with version 5.8.
We are evaluating our options as it relates to PeopleAdmin. We are likely to renew as we can not find another product that gives us the functionality we have with PeopleAdmin 5.8 in the area of Position Description. Outside of that, we would likely be close to finding another product solution.
Technomedia stacks up below the other listed programs. It may solve the bare minimum of your issues, but when it comes to solving more complex issues and processes, it lacks. When you want to add additions or customize things, the process is very costly and labor intensive as well. If it were priced lower, it would make more sense, but there are much better solutions out there.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I've used both Target Recruit and HR Smart. When working with Target Recruit it quickly became apparent it was not the right solution for us. Another solution we examined prior to selection PeopleAdmin was iCIMS. iCIMS is a very social system but was not as familiar with the Higher Education recruitment processes as was PeopleAdmin.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info