Celoxis is a Enterprise online project management solution for midsize to large businesses to help them plan and manage complex and diverse project portfolios. The collective suite includes modules for resource management, budgeting, revenue forecasting, time and expense tracking, reporting and team collaboration. Celoxis includes features such as advanced scheduling, which combines real-world conditions, such as resource time off, multi-time zone, part-time resources, working weekends etc.,…
N/A
Redbooth
Score10 out of 10
N/A
Redbooth is a project management solution built around workstream collaboration, advanced reporting, and enterprise-level communication. An online software, Redbooth helps teams organize everything from small tasks to large projects, at the desk or on the go.
$11
per month per user
Pricing
Celoxis
Redbooth
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Pro
$12
per month per user
Business
$18.75
per month per user
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Celoxis
Redbooth
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Discount available for annual subscription.
More Pricing Information
Features
Celoxis
Redbooth
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Celoxis and Redbooth
Feature
Celoxis
8.3
4 Ratings
8% above category average
Redbooth
7.4
5 Ratings
4% below category average
Task Management
9.34 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
Resource Management
7.74 Ratings
8.94 Ratings
Gantt Charts
7.74 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Scheduling
8.53 Ratings
5.15 Ratings
Workflow Automation
7.53 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Team Collaboration
7.44 Ratings
5.15 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
9.01 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
10.01 Ratings
9.32 Ratings
Document Management
8.02 Ratings
8.74 Ratings
Email integration
9.02 Ratings
5.03 Ratings
Mobile Access
6.01 Ratings
8.24 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
8.53 Ratings
7.13 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
9.02 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
8.03 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Celoxis and Redbooth
Celoxis is a great option if you are looking for an affordable, easy to use, easy to integrate project manegement solution. It is very powerful for waterfall project management. I evaluated more than 15 platforms and could not find any with a close evaluation in terms of cost-benefit to Celoxis. Of course there are more powerfull tools, for 10 times the price. So far, for project management, there hasn't been a requirement I haven't been able to solve with some work. It really lacks features for Agile methodologies, even if it provides a Kanban view, so far it doesn't provide and additional agile artifacts. If an organization has already reached a very mature project management practice and needs to improve on program and portfolio management, Celoxis won't provide any useful feature. If the organization has the resources (skills and time mostly) to develop some workflows and customization, it might work but with a limit. Hopefully Celoxis addresses these features in the near future.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Redbooth is fantastic for freelance artists, small businesses, or even larger companies. It's versatile and can handle and help you stay organized. IT has replaced most every other tool we use to stay up to date on projects, keep track of tasks, and use it for a proofing space. It may not be good if you aren't a freelancer or someone who has many tasks to complete. It seems best when there's at least 2 people in the company.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I used an evalaution matrix built with input of several stakeholders in the company. In the end the matrix included 100 features (non of them was price related). The matrix was heavily focused on waterfall project management, agile related features were only 5 out of 100 features. Features were labeled as mandatory, required or optional. Products which lacked a mandatory feature (like providing technical support) were disqualified. Then a price vs features evaluation was made and only the products with the best combination were seleced to continue: Celoxis, ITM Platform and Mission Control. A final technical evaluation was made comparing the full evaluation but also the evaluation of only the 40 required features. Overall, Celoxis was the better evaluated (76% vs 65% of the second place), for the 40 required features, Celoxis got 91% against 78% of number 2. In the end we chose Celoxis even when it had higher licensing cost.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
