TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Celoxis

    Score10 out of 10
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    Celoxis is a Enterprise online project management solution for midsize to large businesses to help them plan and manage complex and diverse project portfolios. The collective suite includes modules for resource management, budgeting, revenue forecasting, time and expense tracking, reporting and team collaboration. Celoxis includes features such as advanced scheduling, which combines real-world conditions, such as resource time off, multi-time zone, part-time resources, working weekends etc.,…N/A

    Upland PSA

    Score5.8 out of 10
    N/AUpland PSA helps professional services teams grow their business.

    $15

    per month

    Pricing
    CeloxisUpland PSA
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CeloxisUpland PSA
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    CeloxisUpland PSA
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of Celoxis and Upland PSA
    Feature
    Celoxis
    8.3
    4 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Upland PSA
    -
    Ratings
    Task Management9.34 Ratings00 Ratings
    Resource Management7.74 Ratings00 Ratings
    Gantt Charts7.74 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scheduling8.53 Ratings00 Ratings
    Workflow Automation7.53 Ratings00 Ratings
    Team Collaboration7.44 Ratings00 Ratings
    Support for Agile Methodology9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Support for Waterfall Methodology10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document Management8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Email integration9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Access6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Timesheet Tracking8.53 Ratings00 Ratings
    Change request and Case Management9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Budget and Expense Management8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Professional Services Automation
    Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Celoxis and Upland PSA
    Feature
    Celoxis
    8.3
    4 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Upland PSA
    -
    Ratings
    Quotes/estimates8.53 Ratings00 Ratings
    Invoicing7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project & financial reporting7.53 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration with accounting software10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    CeloxisUpland PSA
    Small Businesses
    Any.do
    Score8 out of 10
    Autotask PSA
    Score7.6 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    KanbanFlow
    Score7.3 out of 10
    Workday Professional Services Automation
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Microsoft To Do
    Score7.9 out of 10
    Planview AdaptiveWork
    Score8.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    CeloxisUpland PSA
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.7
    (4 ratings)
    6.0
    (11 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (6 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CeloxisUpland PSA
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Celoxis
    Celoxis is a great option if you are looking for an affordable, easy to use, easy to integrate project manegement solution. It is very powerful for waterfall project management. I evaluated more than 15 platforms and could not find any with a close evaluation in terms of cost-benefit to Celoxis. Of course there are more powerfull tools, for 10 times the price. So far, for project management, there hasn't been a requirement I haven't been able to solve with some work. It really lacks features for Agile methodologies, even if it provides a Kanban view, so far it doesn't provide and additional agile artifacts. If an organization has already reached a very mature project management practice and needs to improve on program and portfolio management, Celoxis won't provide any useful feature. If the organization has the resources (skills and time mostly) to develop some workflows and customization, it might work but with a limit. Hopefully Celoxis addresses these features in the near future.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Upland Software
    We have discovered over the last few years using Tenrox that we could adapt our needs or processes to fit in the Tenrox box rather than adapting Tenrox to fit in ours completely. I feel like Tenrox would be better suited for a company that has fewer clients and projects over the course of a year, as well as fewer users. We have approximately 350 clients, 21,077 projects in Tenrox at this exact moment (we close projects as we can), 188 active users currently, and 415,635 tasks (some of course assigned to now closed projects).
    With this much information hosted through the Tenrox cloud server, we experience increased lag time frequently. This causes a lot of unwanted rejection towards Tenrox in our company.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Celoxis
    • Project planning
    • Time log
    • Efforts analysis vs plan
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Upland Software
    • We love that our timesheets are pre-populated with all our employee's assigned contracts and we get to control what is on their timesheet as far as funder and contract codes.
    • Tenrox did very well with our integration and getting a timesheet that exports well with our payroll provider.
    • Tenrox has a great email reminder system for when people need to submit or approve timesheets.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Celoxis
    • Support is at times slow to respond.
    • Not new user-friendly.
    • Not able to pull in closer or zoom the interface.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Upland Software
    • Tax calculation per state tax rules. Tenrox's current capabilities relative to tax codes is extremely limited and we have to do several time-consuming work-arounds in order to apply the tax as needed for our business. What is particularly frustrating about this aspect is that our need is based on tax laws and codes set by states and I feel a financial system should be able to sufficiently structure for legally-defined tax codes.
    • Tenrox Project Planning add-on module. This portion of the system has never worked as seamlessly as you would assume given they were designed to work together. We've run in to many bugs and just oddities over the years. It's very finicky in my experience. We only use TPP for a small portion of our projects - those being our smaller or need to have huge task lists per client naming requirements.
    • (The bad that became the good!) In the past, we have had significant customer-service challenges with Tenrox and then Upland, however over the past several months we have noticed a marked change in this. If we had not previously experienced issues with the customer service, I would not have any issue with the level of service that we are currently receiving. Given the history, I am cautiously optimistic that our current level of customer service will continue. I think our service concerns finally reached the 'right' people and I am reasonably confident the positive changes are here to stay!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Celoxis
    No answers on this topic
    Upland Software
    I am not in charge of renewing the Tenrox contract. However, if it was up to me, I would renew in a heartbeat. Tenrox is an asset to our organization and it keeps us focused. I am not aware of other products similar to Tenrox that provide the depth that they do.
    Read full review
    Usability
    Celoxis
    No answers on this topic
    Upland Software
    I feel like if the user interface could combine time and expense for users to be entered on one screen rather than two completely separate locations it would greatly improve usability. If the expense entry process could be improved completely, it would greatly improve the usability as well. Everything else within Tenrox, makes everything very user friendly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Celoxis
    No answers on this topic
    Upland Software
    The support team is always very helpful and strives to ensure they have met your needs and corrected your issues in a timely manner. If they need more information or cannot recreate the issue themselves, then they will follow-up to gather the necessary data themselves. They are constantly striving to meet the needs of all users and understand so many different industries and types of environments out there, it is very impressive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Celoxis
    No answers on this topic
    Upland Software
    The main thing with implementation is to make sure you have taken full advantage of the "sandbox testing" site that Tenrox provides to you during development. Try out every scenario you can think of, have other people enter information if needed, so that you can make sure you have not missed any big items. If you have the opportunity, roll out implementation to small groups of users. Depending on how your company is set up, I would choose groups that are not all in the same department so that you can address questions across all areas before adding in more users in the next wave of implementation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Celoxis
    I used an evalaution matrix built with input of several stakeholders in the company. In the end the matrix included 100 features (non of them was price related). The matrix was heavily focused on waterfall project management, agile related features were only 5 out of 100 features. Features were labeled as mandatory, required or optional. Products which lacked a mandatory feature (like providing technical support) were disqualified. Then a price vs features evaluation was made and only the products with the best combination were seleced to continue: Celoxis, ITM Platform and Mission Control. A final technical evaluation was made comparing the full evaluation but also the evaluation of only the 40 required features. Overall, Celoxis was the better evaluated (76% vs 65% of the second place), for the 40 required features, Celoxis got 91% against 78% of number 2. In the end we chose Celoxis even when it had higher licensing cost.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Upland Software
    The Tenrox software looks and feels older and is not as user friendly! Harvest, for example, is an upgraded version that is easier to track and compile. This is what I'm comparing it to and it's not even close! We only selected Tenrox because it was cheaper and we had a connection in the company with someone at Tenrox to use that platform. We are currently looking for a change.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Celoxis
    • Positive in most cases
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Upland Software
    • Tracking, tracking, tracking. It keeps the data we need and gives us the ability to look at it in countless different ways with just a few clicks, which is a big time saver. Without Tenrox, we would definitely have to increase our headcount in order to accomplish billing and payroll.
    • We recently were able to automate a huge portion of business that was still (yes, still in 2014!) being managed out of an Excel spreadsheet. We experienced a great deal of resistance to the change with our own employees, however now that we have it going we have cleaned up our invoicing and impressed the highest-financial officer for two consecutive months - our first/only two months billing directly from Tenrox for that group.
    • A newer development for our team - Some client managers in the other divisions our company have begun to look at what we are able to do with Tenrox and our other primary system and get some of their work moved over to our group. This is great and is giving us new opportunities - we will likely need to increase the headcount of our admin. team, but for a good reason (too much work coming our way!).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Celoxis Screenshots

    Screenshot of Celoxis DashboardScreenshot of Gantt chartScreenshot of WorkloadScreenshot of TimesheetScreenshot of Resource ManagementProduct screenshot