What users are saying about
7 Ratings
4 Ratings
7 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.9 out of 100
4 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 9.1 out of 100

Feature Set Ratings

  • WorkOtter PPM ranks higher in 1 feature set: Project Management

Project Management

8.3

Celoxis

83%
9.9

WorkOtter PPM

99%
WorkOtter PPM ranks higher in 9/14 features

Task Management

9.3
93%
4 Ratings
10.0
100%
1 Rating

Resource Management

7.7
77%
4 Ratings
10.0
100%
2 Ratings

Gantt Charts

7.7
77%
4 Ratings
10.0
100%
2 Ratings

Scheduling

8.5
85%
3 Ratings
10.0
100%
2 Ratings

Workflow Automation

7.5
75%
3 Ratings
10.0
100%
1 Rating

Team Collaboration

7.3
73%
4 Ratings
9.0
90%
1 Rating

Support for Agile Methodology

9.0
90%
1 Rating
10.0
100%
1 Rating

Support for Waterfall Methodology

10.0
100%
1 Rating
N/A
0 Ratings

Document Management

8.0
80%
2 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings

Email integration

9.0
90%
2 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings

Mobile Access

6.0
60%
1 Rating
N/A
0 Ratings

Timesheet Tracking

8.5
85%
3 Ratings
10.0
100%
1 Rating

Change request and Case Management

9.0
90%
2 Ratings
10.0
100%
1 Rating

Budget and Expense Management

8.0
80%
3 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings

Professional Services Automation

8.3

Celoxis

83%

WorkOtter PPM

Feature Set Not Supported
N/A
Celoxis ranks higher in 4/4 features

Quotes/estimates

8.5
85%
3 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings

Invoicing

7.0
70%
2 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings

Project & financial reporting

7.5
75%
3 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings

Integration with accounting software

10.0
100%
1 Rating
N/A
0 Ratings

Attribute Ratings

  • WorkOtter PPM is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend

Likelihood to Recommend

8.7

Celoxis

87%
4 Ratings
10.0

WorkOtter PPM

100%
2 Ratings

Likelihood to Recommend

Celoxis

Celoxis is a great option if you are looking for an affordable, easy to use, easy to integrate project manegement solution. It is very powerful for waterfall project management. I evaluated more than 15 platforms and could not find any with a close evaluation in terms of cost-benefit to Celoxis. Of course there are more powerfull tools, for 10 times the price. So far, for project management, there hasn't been a requirement I haven't been able to solve with some work.It really lacks features for Agile methodologies, even if it provides a Kanban view, so far it doesn't provide and additional agile artifacts. If an organization has already reached a very mature project management practice and needs to improve on program and portfolio management, Celoxis won't provide any useful feature. If the organization has the resources (skills and time mostly) to develop some workflows and customization, it might work but with a limit. Hopefully Celoxis addresses these features in the near future.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

WorkOtter PPM

I know it works well for IT but not sure how it would work for construction. I think construction has a different set of needs.
Adam Gordon | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pros

Celoxis

  • Project planning
  • Time log
  • Efforts analysis vs plan
Hanan Weisman | TrustRadius Reviewer

WorkOtter PPM

  • Users find it easy to use which is important if you have a large number of users who don't have time for a lot of training or when new hires come on-board.
  • WorkOtter has a lot of advanced features that we don't use but when we do need one, it is nice to know the feature is waiting for us. We have used several of these features for special projects.
  • It does a good job with resource management.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Cons

Celoxis

  • Support is at times slow to respond.
  • Not new user-friendly.
  • Not able to pull in closer or zoom the interface.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

WorkOtter PPM

  • Nothing significant. Maybe could be faster at times but I'm not sure if that is our own internet connection.
Adam Gordon | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pricing Details

Celoxis

General

Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Starting Price

$25 per user, per month

Celoxis Editions & Modules

On-premise Edition
On-Premise$4501
  1. per user, one time
SaaS Edition
SaaS$251
  1. per user, per month
Additional Pricing Details
Duration and Volume discounts (For SaaS) Volume discounts (For On-Premise) Free Support for 1st year (For On-Premise) Low TCO with multi-OS, database support (For On-Premise) Free Client-logins and "email-only" users One hour complimentary Celoxis Administrator course

WorkOtter PPM

General

Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Starting Price

$10 per user per month

WorkOtter PPM Editions & Modules

Edition
Time/Status$101
Team$202
Manager$352
  1. per user per month
  2. per user, per month
Additional Pricing Details
Time/Status Tier is BEST FOR: Contractors, Consultants, Limited Team Members FUNCTIONALITY AVAILABLE:Timesheets, Adjust Estimate To Complete, Create Notes for PM and Team Members Team Tier is BEST FOR: Customers, Suppliers, Contractors, Consultants, Team Members FUNCTIONALITY INCLUDES TIME/STATUS PLUS: My Home Dashboards, Support Log Updates, Issue Updates, Changes, Timesheet & Expenses, Risks, Action Items Limited, Reporting, E-Mail Updates, Chat & Collaboration Manager Tier is BEST FOR: Project Managers, Program Managers, Executives, PMO Department Managers, Administrators FUNCTIONALITY INCLUDES TEAM PLUS: Project Management, Microsoft Project -Way Sync, Dashboard Reporting, Program Management, Resource Management, Portfolio Management, Workflow Management, Estimating and Templates

Alternatives Considered

Celoxis

I used an evalaution matrix built with input of several stakeholders in the company. In the end the matrix included 100 features (non of them was price related). The matrix was heavily focused on waterfall project management, agile related features were only 5 out of 100 features. Features were labeled as mandatory, required or optional. Products which lacked a mandatory feature (like providing technical support) were disqualified. Then a price vs features evaluation was made and only the products with the best combination were seleced to continue: Celoxis, ITM Platform and Mission Control. A final technical evaluation was made comparing the full evaluation but also the evaluation of only the 40 required features. Overall, Celoxis was the better evaluated (76% vs 65% of the second place), for the 40 required features, Celoxis got 91% against 78% of number 2. In the end we chose Celoxis even when it had higher licensing cost.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

WorkOtter PPM

No answers on this topic

Return on Investment

Celoxis

  • Positive in most cases
Hanan Weisman | TrustRadius Reviewer

WorkOtter PPM

  • I think it has really helped us make sure we are using resources effectively but I think it is hard to prove. Although we don't have hard ROI numbers, I believe the general feeling is that you really need a good PPM tool or will waste a lot of time and money.
  • It helps with communication since we have a standard process.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Screenshots

Add comparison