Celoxis is a Enterprise online project management solution for midsize to large businesses to help them plan and manage complex and diverse project portfolios. The collective suite includes modules for resource management, budgeting, revenue forecasting, time and expense tracking, reporting and team collaboration. Celoxis includes features such as advanced scheduling, which combines real-world conditions, such as resource time off, multi-time zone, part-time resources, working weekends etc.,…
N/A
Zoho Flow
Score9.8 out of 10
N/A
Zoho Flow allows the user to integrate business apps to automate a workflow.
$29
per month (for 5k tasks per month)
Pricing
Celoxis
Zoho Flow
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Standard
starting at $29
per month starting with 5k tasks per month
Professional
starting at $49
per month starting with 10k tasks per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Celoxis
Zoho Flow
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
—
Discount available for annual pricing. Higher monthly task volume available.
More Pricing Information
Features
Celoxis
Zoho Flow
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Celoxis and Zoho Flow
Feature
Celoxis
8.3
4 Ratings
8% above category average
Zoho Flow
-
Ratings
Task Management
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resource Management
7.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Gantt Charts
7.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scheduling
8.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow Automation
7.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Team Collaboration
7.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document Management
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email integration
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile Access
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
8.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Celoxis and Zoho Flow
Feature
Celoxis
8.3
4 Ratings
8% above category average
Zoho Flow
-
Ratings
Quotes/estimates
8.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Invoicing
7.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project & financial reporting
7.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with accounting software
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Celoxis and Zoho Flow
Celoxis is a great option if you are looking for an affordable, easy to use, easy to integrate project manegement solution. It is very powerful for waterfall project management. I evaluated more than 15 platforms and could not find any with a close evaluation in terms of cost-benefit to Celoxis. Of course there are more powerfull tools, for 10 times the price. So far, for project management, there hasn't been a requirement I haven't been able to solve with some work. It really lacks features for Agile methodologies, even if it provides a Kanban view, so far it doesn't provide and additional agile artifacts. If an organization has already reached a very mature project management practice and needs to improve on program and portfolio management, Celoxis won't provide any useful feature. If the organization has the resources (skills and time mostly) to develop some workflows and customization, it might work but with a limit. Hopefully Celoxis addresses these features in the near future.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
For small—to medium-sized connections between different applications, Zoho Flow is quick and easy to set up and test. However, as a Flow becomes more complicated with multiple connections and decisions, it becomes more difficult to track errors and faults and manage changes. Some of this is due to the history not being detailed enough, and some is just the UI, where you can't zoom in and out and clearly see connecting lines for flows.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Flow can accomplish almost anything you want to do. It's imperfect, but it could be with just a few more features and better error management/visibility. For someone who's not a developer, this is a no-brainer. Having used other products in the past, like Zapier, this is as easy to use, if not even easier.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I've reached out to the support team several times with assistance requests in Zoho Flow. Each time the team has answered my questions promptly and accurately. And because we are mainly integrating other Zoho apps their teams are perfectly positioned to solve our problems.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I used an evalaution matrix built with input of several stakeholders in the company. In the end the matrix included 100 features (non of them was price related). The matrix was heavily focused on waterfall project management, agile related features were only 5 out of 100 features. Features were labeled as mandatory, required or optional. Products which lacked a mandatory feature (like providing technical support) were disqualified. Then a price vs features evaluation was made and only the products with the best combination were seleced to continue: Celoxis, ITM Platform and Mission Control. A final technical evaluation was made comparing the full evaluation but also the evaluation of only the 40 required features. Overall, Celoxis was the better evaluated (76% vs 65% of the second place), for the 40 required features, Celoxis got 91% against 78% of number 2. In the end we chose Celoxis even when it had higher licensing cost.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I've used Zapier and both programs are similar. Zapier has deeper integrations or more apps to integrate with but considering Flow's association with other Zoho apps this does it for us!
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info