Certinia FM Cloud vs. Epicor Eclipse

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Certinia FM Cloud
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Certinia FM Cloud automates financial management on the Salesforce platform. The customer-centric software includes a general ledger, automated billing processes, and financial intelligence.N/A
Epicor Eclipse
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Epicor Eclipse is an end-to-end business system for wholesale distributors, as well as electrical, HVAC, plumbing and PVF businesses. Eclipse simplifies complex distribution processes found in today’s dynamic supply chains.N/A
Pricing
Certinia FM CloudEpicor Eclipse
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Certinia FM CloudEpicor Eclipse
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional DetailsCertinia Professional Services Cloud software follows a subscription-based pricing model that is typically structured according to the number of users and the level of features required. The software’s pricing may vary depending on the organization’s size and needs, with options to select modules or add-ons for additional functionality. Specific pricing details may require a consultation or quote from Certinia for tailored solutions.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Certinia FM CloudEpicor Eclipse
Considered Both Products
Certinia FM Cloud
Chose Certinia FM Cloud
FinancialForce Subscription & Usage Billing has more features, more useability, and manages higher numbers of customers. The systems I have used in the past are easier to navigate but couldn't handle this number of customers.
Chose Certinia FM Cloud
Infinitely better. We are much happier with FinancialForce ERP rather than Netsuite. This allows us so much more flexibility and growth potential. There is a good chance we will use other functionality of FinancialForce in the future to stay within the same ecosystem. We …
Chose Certinia FM Cloud
FFA is built on the SalesForce platform, giving us one source of data for our KPIs. Unlike Dynamics, FFA allows us to create custom reports and dashboards through which we can share financial results. We were able to better automate and streamline accounts payable using FFA. …
Chose Certinia FM Cloud
NetSuite is much better in that it can produce financial statements, has a subscription module, and is just as customizable as FinancialForce. If you have a midsized company, NetSuite may be better suited for your business needs. FinancialForce requires a lot of in-house …
Chose Certinia FM Cloud
Compared to other accounting software FinancialForce Accounting has its good and bad aspects but overall it is a good option. Reporting directly from FinancialForce Accounting can be difficult to do, but standard accounting tasks are straightforward and not time-consuming to …
Chose Certinia FM Cloud
The initial allure of FinancialForce Accounting was the fact that we were very happy with Salesforce.com and the ability to integrate FinancialForce Accounting with Salesforce.com easily (although it was time-consuming). But after analyzing its functionality it was also …
Chose Certinia FM Cloud
Outside CPA was strong proponent of Quickbooks and it was evaluated initially, but size of company, complexity of transactions, eventual move to Salesforce and need for multi-company and multicurrency ruled it out almost from the start. As the only accounting system built …
Epicor Eclipse
Chose Epicor Eclipse
I wasn't involved in this process. We don't consider changing ERPs because our user base is too large, and it would take too many resources.
Chose Epicor Eclipse
I have not finished my comparison
Chose Epicor Eclipse
NetSuite ERP and Oracle Cloud Functions
Chose Epicor Eclipse
Most of my experience has been with Epicor's Prophet 21. For most distribution verticals, Prophet 21 is the only way to go. The comparison I've drawn is this: Prophet 21 is like a ferrari. Epicor Eclipse is like a reliable donkey. Both get you from point A to point B but …
Chose Epicor Eclipse
There aren't any better industry specific ones, but I have looked at Dynamics 365, SAP, Odoo, and others to see if a more robust, configurable, ERP could be customized to suit our industry. Not yet, but the balance is tipping away from Eclipse.
Chose Epicor Eclipse
The first company that I worked for in the wholesale industry had an in house ERP. This ERP, I thought at the time was really great. When I started using e-term, I realized that my first experience of an ERP was not as strong as it could have been.
Chose Epicor Eclipse
Since we have been on Eclipse for 13 years, our only comparison to other business systems is when training new employees and ask those new users their opinions during training. In general, nearly all new users of Solar Eclipse are impressed by the ease of use, ease of …
Chose Epicor Eclipse
Been using Eclipse for almost 20 years. It would take something major to make us look elsewhere.
Chose Epicor Eclipse
Epicor Eclipse was here when I started 2 years ago. SAP and Great Plains were used at previous employers. Epicor Eclipse versus the others, I would say that Eclipse has the edge in terms of the learning curve for new employees because of how easy it is to use. However, it is …
Chose Epicor Eclipse
Eclipse is more user friendly
Features
Certinia FM CloudEpicor Eclipse
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
Ratings
12% above category average
Epicor Eclipse
7.8
Ratings
5% above category average
Pay calculation8.50 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Benefit plan administration8.00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Direct deposit files9.00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
Ratings
11% above category average
Epicor Eclipse
6.5
Ratings
15% below category average
API for custom integration8.80 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Plug-ins8.00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
Ratings
0% above category average
Epicor Eclipse
6.1
Ratings
32% below category average
Single sign-on capability8.60 Ratings5.60 Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.10 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
7.9
Ratings
6% above category average
Epicor Eclipse
5.2
Ratings
36% below category average
Dashboards8.40 Ratings5.40 Ratings
Standard reports6.50 Ratings5.40 Ratings
Custom reports8.80 Ratings4.80 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
7.9
Ratings
3% above category average
Epicor Eclipse
7.2
Ratings
7% below category average
Accounts payable8.00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Accounts receivable7.10 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Global Financial Support8.00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers7.00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations6.30 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Configurable Accounting7.40 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Standardized Processes8.70 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
10.0
Ratings
22% above category average
Epicor Eclipse
6.5
Ratings
21% below category average
Inventory tracking10.00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Automatic reordering10.00 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Location management10.00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
8.1
Ratings
2% above category average
Epicor Eclipse
7.2
Ratings
9% below category average
Pricing8.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Order entry8.00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Credit card processing8.50 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Cost of goods sold8.00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Order Orchestration00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
8.7
Ratings
14% above category average
Epicor Eclipse
7.0
Ratings
7% below category average
Travel & Expense Management10.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting7.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Billing Management00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Period Close00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
9.3
Ratings
20% above category average
Epicor Eclipse
5.7
Ratings
28% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting9.00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Project Costing9.00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Cost Capture10.00 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Capital Project Management9.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance10.00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition10.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
8.2
Ratings
14% above category average
Epicor Eclipse
6.7
Ratings
6% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling7.00 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers7.00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality8.00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools8.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
-
Ratings
Epicor Eclipse
7.5
Ratings
0% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management00 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
-
Ratings
Epicor Eclipse
6.3
Ratings
12% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Contract Authoring00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Contract Repository00 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Supplier Management00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
-
Ratings
Epicor Eclipse
5.9
Ratings
12% below category average
Risk Repository00 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Control Management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments00 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Issue Detection00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Remediation and Certification00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
-
Ratings
Epicor Eclipse
5.3
Ratings
27% below category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization00 Ratings5.30 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management00 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management00 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Fulfillment Management00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
-
Ratings
Epicor Eclipse
6.3
Ratings
17% below category average
Production Process Design00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Production Management00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Configuration Management00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Work Execution00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
-
Ratings
Epicor Eclipse
6.1
Ratings
18% below category average
Forecasting00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Inventory Planning00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring00 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
-
Ratings
Epicor Eclipse
6.7
Ratings
9% below category average
Proposal Management00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Product Master Data Management00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Certinia FM CloudEpicor Eclipse
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.2 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.3 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.3 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Certinia FM CloudEpicor Eclipse
Likelihood to Recommend
6.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
4.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
6.7
(0 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
5.5
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Online Training
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
4.5
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
4.5
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
4.5
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
4.5
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Certinia FM CloudEpicor Eclipse
Likelihood to Recommend
FFA is a good product if you want the ability to customize functionality and reporting. However, all the setup can be overwhelming if you are looking for an out-of-the-box solution. FFA is a great choice is you are already using Salesforce and want to report on KPIs directly from the source data. There are a lot of applications to help you feed data into the system or export it out in a usable format.
Read full review
The capabilities, when combined with some of the integration offerings, make for a really nice platform. Coming from another company where we had several systems for processing inbound, outbound, e-commerce, sales, etc., it is nice to have everything contained in one system. makes communication within the company easier and teaching easier.
Read full review
Pros
  • Comprehensive spreadsheets and dashboards with filtering functions.
  • Ease of file upload and conversion to and from Excel.
  • The overall spread of the homepage makes for easy access to whatever information you're looking for.
  • I believe FFA has a tremendous ability to data easy to access by all departments, but also is complex enough to retrieve specific data that is needed.
Read full review
  • Great for retail sales and it works well with ipads, scanners, credit card machines and was easy to implement.
  • Initial support, setting up Eclipse and ensuring that everything works correctly was a huge benefit. We were off running from the start.
  • Epicor has continuing education on its products and offers alternatives for things they cant do.
Read full review
Cons
  • It took a very very long time to implement and we had configuration issues after the implementation that had to be addressed.
  • Cannot run scheduled reports.
  • Difficult to run reports (training is needed to configure the reports).
Read full review
  • In my opinion, Epicor seems to want to sell add-on products constantly. They don't provide pricing at the beginning, but then rely on sticker shock and hidden costs (e.g. APIs)
  • There are times when we cannot figure out where numbers are coming from, especially costs. It would be nice if there was a way to see, in plain English, where a cost is coming from.
  • It seems unconscionable that we are unable to print financial statements to a pdf file.
  • In our experience, Support, which had been going well for a while, has become much less reliable and not very timely.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
The company has now converted its legacy, "home grown" operations system and built it on the force.com platform, and the integration between it and FinancialForce is deeply entrenched. No other application would be able to replicate this functionality, and the company will be able to scale and leverage the force.com platform as it grows.
Read full review
I use it every day and can't see a reason why I would stop unless I started a new job. If I were to leave my present position, the new job would be much more attractive if they were Eclipse users.
Read full review
Usability
Change management is always an issue, but the evidence of the application's usability is that both long-time employees (used to the legacy systems for many years) and newer employees have been able to learn the system and improve their business processes.
Read full review
Epicor Eclipse has saved our organization from financial mismanagement, which could lead to operational inefficiencies. It has streamlined purchase orders and invoice processing, reducing instances of underpayment and overpayment. It has enhanced the segmentation of financial statements by store and by day, making it easier to track profitability.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Unless the internet is completely unavailable - which has not happened yet - the application is always accessible. Since FinancialForce is built on the force.com platform, it's uptime is tied to Salesforce security and system performance standards
Read full review
I haven't experienced any outages in the two years I have been using the system. It is always available as long as the computer is up. The only time I have seen it not be available was on occasions where we lost internet, or power and then we lost access to everything, not just Epicor Eclipse.
Read full review
Performance
If Visualforce pages are enabled, they sometimes slow down the load time.
Read full review
Everything in this system moves fairly quickly, that may be in part because we are a small company with only 21 users on the system at a time, or it may just be a the way the Epicor Eclipse works for any size company with any number of users. I can only speak for what I know and say that it is fast for our purposes.
Read full review
Support Rating
The response time for FinancialForce is exemplary. Immediate acknowledgement of the support request by automatically logging a case/ticket on the provider side, then less than 24-hour follow up by a support team member with specific questions, information or resolution for the issue.
Read full review
The tier 1 support is trying, and sometimes they are successful. Sometimes they aren't. This topic isn't as black and white as the questions might suggest. Currently their Tier 1 support team is over seas, all items automatically go to Tier 1 and then when they can't help they either escalate it or tell me they need to check with someone else and they will get back to me. If they escalate me to Tier 2, then the issue comes back to the States and the support is usually at a higher knowledge/experience level and it can get resolved fairly quickly. If they don't escalate, then it might take weeks and multiple follow ups on my part before I either get a satisfactory resolution or finally get escalated.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
The training classes that I have attended have been top notch. The presenters are extremely knowledgeable on their subject matter, including real-world application of the system. They aren't just software techs training end users, they seem to be end users that have become experts in the over functionality and capabilities of the system.
Read full review
Online Training
Through its Xtra login website available to its customers, FinancialForce offers a complete set of online, video tutorials, training and documentation. Each tutorial is "bite-sized", meaning it imparts instructional, step-by-step information in 2-3 minute narrated videos. For a particular cycle or process, like invoices to payments for example, each tutorial builds on the last so that the user can get a complete picture of the steps and process in less than 10 minutes.
Read full review
The on-line training is very good, and it is taught by the same people that do the live in-person training sessions. The difficult part of it is, asking questions about your specific company's nuances or special circumstances. I don't remember if you can access the on-line training sessions after you have taken them for reminders purposes, but if so that is a great asset.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
The company decided to run parallel for three months in order to soften the impact of the change from the legacy "system" - which users had been interfacing with for over a decade - to FinancialForce. While not recommended, this did provide time for the in-house "super user" team of 2 people to become completely familiar with the application, and thus provide hands-on training and be a resource for the users who would be processing the daily accounting transactions.
Read full review
I don't really know about the implementation, it was back in 1998 and I didn't start here until 2016. By the time I started here they had been running it for a number of years and most of the people that were here when it was implemented are no longer here, and the ones that are don't really have much to say about how the implementation went either bad or good.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
FinancialForce Subscription & Usage Billing has more features, more useability, and manages higher numbers of customers. The systems I have used in the past are easier to navigate but couldn't handle this number of customers.
Read full review
Most of my experience has been with Epicor's Prophet 21. For most distribution verticals, Prophet 21 is the only way to go. The comparison I've drawn is this: Prophet 21 is like a ferrari. Epicor Eclipse is like a reliable donkey. Both get you from point A to point B but Prophet 21 is going to get you there much quicker and with the kind of insight into your business that will help you thrive.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
I don't really know about the scalability. It's the same as it was when I started, I do know that you can buy more user licenses, but I think they come in packs of 5, which can be a problem if you only need 1 and will never use the other 4. But, again I'm not sure on that.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We moved to a subscription business, and FinancialForce cannot facilitate it. After using FinancialForce for 4 years, we had to switch to NetSuite. We had a negative return on investment with all the resources we used to do in-house development in FnancialForce.
  • FinancialForce did not have a good way to match payments against invoices, and it was a very manual process. We spent a lot of human hours to get it done.
  • It was still relatively cheap, so for the 4 years that we used it, the actual cost of the product was what we could only afford at the time.
Read full review
  • Reporting features allow tracking items trending downward which can glut inventory space and dollars if not adjusted
  • GMROI reports help analyze turn ratios and adjusted dollar values and margins of product lines.
  • Suggested Purchase Order features allowed controlled inventory purchases which avoid lost sales while managing overall dollars invested in an acquired product with the lowest freight costs possible.
Read full review
ScreenShots