ChatForCharities vs. IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition vs. Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ChatForCharities
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$39
per month
IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
WebSphere Hybrid Edition from IBM is a collection of WebSphere application runtimes and modernization tools that provides support for on-premise and major public cloud deployments, in virtual machines, containers and Kubernetes. The user can choose any WebSphere edition and deploy Liberty and application modernization tools to help move to a cloud-native architecture, modernize existing applications and support an existing WebSphere estate.
$88.50
per month
Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Application Server is an expanded server role in the Windows Server® 2008 operating system. It provided an integrated environment for deploying and running custom, server-based business applications. These applications respond to requests that arrive over the network from remote client computers or from other applications. Application Server is deprecated.N/A
Pricing
ChatForCharitiesIBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionMicrosoft Application Server (deprecated)
Editions & Modules
Basic
$39
per month
Application Server
$88.50
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ChatForCharitiesIBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionMicrosoft Application Server (deprecated)
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ChatForCharitiesIBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionMicrosoft Application Server (deprecated)
Considered Multiple Products
ChatForCharities

No answer on this topic

IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
Websphere Liberty has a cloud ready runtime, embebed with a Developlment standards like spring, ee standards

IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition has a native connections to IBM products, so when you have a IBM Environtment it the best way to get all IBM Beneffits
Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
Apache Tomcat, WildFly and Oracle WebLogic Server
Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
Plesk provides assistance via its community forums, knowledge base, and premium support plans. Additionally, I had trouble integrating a new website onto the hosting, which was a bit of a frantic operation because it uses more server resources than other control panels. The …
Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
IBM Websphere was better suited for our needs as we are a primarily Java shop, and it provided better customization and potential ROI. It also requires less downtime, and support is easier than Weblogic. Also, Websphere is better suited for a hybrid environment.
Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition was more responsive to our needs, offered better customization options, and we projected better ROI.
Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
Cleo Integration Clould has many bells and whistles; however, when we added more maps and trading partners, it really slowed down. We found that the Cleo support was very slow to respond and there was a language barrier. IBM Websphere had better customer support and its …
Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
IBM and weblogic are equally robust and support JVM's very well but where IBM is better is its out of the box integration with active directory that makes it easier to manage access control and security posture. In addition, the licensing model for IBM is lot more flexible for …
Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
I like the well built hybrid edition that is very favourable for our cloud apps and real-time monitoring of our applications deployment and development. I like it support real-time visibility a complete and clear view of our applications development and application awareness. I …
Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
Both Apache Tomcat and Hybris have been in use, and we have provided support for both tomcat and IIS-based systems. Companies with a substantial investment in IBM technology will find this application particularly useful. Support and licensing fees might be prohibitive, …
Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
Magento and Hybris are both also being used, we have also supported tomcat and IIS solutions
Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
WebSphere Application Server admin console is very detailed and there are a huge number of configurations available to maintain and configure. JBoss is complex where stand vs full configuration is confusing sometimes. Modularity proved complex there, so I love WebSphere …
Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
Websphere Application Server provides better Security, high availability, easy troubleshooting, and good 24/7 support. Websphere Application Server has an easy to use interface.
Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
WAS is an IBM product and gels with IBM database product. So, we have decided to go with IBM WAS. WAS supports more data sources than Oracle web logic. So, ideally it can be used with multiple databases.
Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
WebSphere Application can complement with an IBM UrbanCode Deploy to do faster deployments in a Devops model for accelerated application delivery.
Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
IBM support is better than Oracle, from past experience. Weblogic and WebSphere Application Server are somewhat similar versus the open source JBOSS. For many applications we had selected WAS to have a supported platform and used some of the competitors in other various use …
Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
JBoss, Tomcat, Glassfish are some of the alternatives. I did not select it, it was my team's decision.
Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
I have worked on JBOSS and WEBLOGIC Application servers apart from Websphere application servers. WebSphere Application Server has a more user friendly admin console GUI. I believe WAS administration and maintenance activities are more easy and effective as compared to other …
Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
Websphere Application Server supports enterprise Java open standards, streamlines deployment, has very flexible management capabilities and better reliability and availability.
Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
I recommended WebSphere because of my expertise on it and the great IBM support.
Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
I did not choose IBM WAS, it was a coporate decision. We are glad that we have been using this for a number of years and are quite happy as a corporation. However, it does take more time to learn WAS because of its complexity in terms of installation, various features and …
Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
Chose Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
We did choose because of its dependability, speed, complex environment support, and ease of use. Microsoft Application Server is cheaper than IBM WebSphere Application Server and faster than WebSphere. Microsoft Application Server is a close competitor in terms of features, but …
Chose Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
Microsoft Application Server has stood out to me because it has been so easy to use and utilize for our organization. I was not involved in the integration but being a user I can say that it has made a huge impact to how we access and utilize our databases. I have found that …
Chose Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
Microsoft Application Server was cheaper then what IBM Websphere Application Server would have cost us. Also, our legacy applications run much faster on MS Application Server.
Chose Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
We chose MS Application Server since it's fast and reliable and support complex environments and it's simple to set up and get running.
Chose Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
Too complex to setup and maintain. It also lacks enterprise-level SLA and support that Microsoft provides.
Chose Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
It has a similar feature to what Microsoft Application Server has but at a greater cost and also having to deal with another vendor when we could use a full Microsoft Stack for better training and support.
Chose Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
It is the only one we tested so far.
Chose Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
This server is much more efficient and easy to use. The IBM we previously had was unreliable and required a lot of maintenance time.
Features
ChatForCharitiesIBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionMicrosoft Application Server (deprecated)
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
ChatForCharities
-
Ratings
IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
7.3
Ratings
9% below category average
Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
8.0
Ratings
0% above category average
IDE support00 Ratings5.40 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Security management00 Ratings8.20 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Administration and management00 Ratings7.80 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Application server performance00 Ratings8.10 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Installation00 Ratings7.50 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance00 Ratings6.60 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ChatForCharitiesIBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionMicrosoft Application Server (deprecated)
Small Businesses
Gist
Gist
Score 9.5 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Genesys DX (discontinued)
Genesys DX (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Genesys DX (discontinued)
Genesys DX (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ChatForCharitiesIBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionMicrosoft Application Server (deprecated)
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ChatForCharitiesIBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionMicrosoft Application Server (deprecated)
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
IBM WebSphere Hybrid edition is well-suited for the development and deployment of large enterprise-level applications such as Electronic Health Records that are used in our organization. IBM WebSphere is appropriate for organizations that require strong security and compliance as it provides a high level of security and compliance features. This works well with organizations that are subject to strict regulatory requirements, such as hospitals.
Read full review
Regardless of the environment, Microsoft Application Server is used to manage internal applications. Installing legacy software on the computers of end-users is a cinch with this solution. It provides a central location for updating and managing legacy applications. It is less valuable if you're using only web-based and cloud-based apps.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • It works out of the box. Its basic functionality is all there and everything works with no adjustments.
  • The functionality is there for fine tuning, to allow applications to be easier to access and quicker with some tweaks, but again, these aren't necessary for basic running.
Read full review
  • Microsoft Application Server has been very stable. We have had very few issues with downtime except for updates.
  • We now have a central location to manage and update our legacy apps without the need to install each app on each user's system.
  • Application performance is surprisingly very good and responsive even in bandwidth restricted environments.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • In this era of cloud technology, Websphere Application Server required Integration with cloud technology.
  • Troubleshooting tools need to included in Websphere Application Server package for better troubleshooting of issues.
  • Websphere Application Server comes with some basic performance tools and these troubleshooting and performance tools need to be enhanced.
  • It's available in all operating systems like Windows AIX Unix Solaris Zos etc.
Read full review
  • Wished Microsoft would offer better support options that are cheaper.
  • Updates sometimes require restarts which cause downtime.
  • More support for 3rd part software vendors.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Mostly we will be renewing unless the strategic direction changes drastically or there are other complelling external circumstances. We've been on a multi year project to modernize our legacy applications and that effort will continue for the foreseeable future.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
No answers on this topic
WebSphere Application Server is used across our organization. Most projects use this for Java products and applications. Being robust and scalable makes it even more usable. We love using WebSphere Application Server due to its configuration management ability made simple and vast across all java related parameters. It is dependent on the features and upgrades and IBM releases some great upgrades to WebSphere Application Server.
Read full review
I have found Microsoft Application Server to be incredibly easy to use. I have used dozens of similar programs and have always struggled to navigate through all the functions. So far I have been able to adapt and learn this software with ease. I rarely run into a problem that I wasn’t easily able to move forward on with a few tips.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
Deploys fairly quick enough and like the roll-out update feature decreasing the downtime and also plays well with other integration tools as well.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
IBM was quick to respond when we had an issue with our specific infrastructure. We raised a PMR, which they picked up quickly and updated us about every step of the way. We had an appropriate fix for quite a business critical issue within a fortnight, which was impressive!
Read full review
MS Application Server has been great for our company it has enabled us to free up IT staff and lowered the maintenance costs of our internal application maintenance.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
I did not choose IBM WAS, it was a coporate decision. We are glad that we have been using this for a number of years and are quite happy as a corporation. However, it does take more time to learn WAS because of its complexity in terms of installation, various features and special deployment and packaging needs.
Read full review
Microsoft Application Server has stood out to me because it has been so easy to use and utilize for our organization. I was not involved in the integration but being a user I can say that it has made a huge impact to how we access and utilize our databases. I have found that using Microsoft Application Server has increased my productivity. I spend less time navigating and waiting for things to load.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • It has security features that has enhanced security of our enterprise and its data.
  • WebSphere Hybrid Edition has improved performance making it easier for our organization to fix any problem that might occur.
  • It has improved collaboration enhancing team work making the work efficient.
  • WebSphere Hybrid Edition can be complex to individuals who are not familiar with it.
Read full review
  • MS Application Server has been great for our ROI since it has reduced dedicating IT resources to maintaining legacy applications on end-users systems.
  • We have been able to have a central location for all our legacy and on-prem applications.
  • Our IT operations have been able to greatly improve efficiencies.
Read full review
ScreenShots