Checkmk vs. N-able N-central
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Checkmk | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | Checkmk is a solution for IT Monitoring of servers, applications, networks, cloud infrastructures (public, private, hybrid), containers, storage, databases and environment sensors. It can be deployed under all major Linux distributions or users can run it as Docker container or virtual appliance on other operating systems including Windows. The tool is available as a Raw Edition, which is open-source, and as an Enterprise Edition with a many additional enterprise features. The… | $0 up to 10 systems |
N-able N-central | Score9.2 out of 10 | N/A | MSPs and IT professionals use N-able™ N-central® to monitor and manage devices and complex networks remotely. N-central provides visibility and efficiency as the user's needs scale. N-central can help users: 1. Proactively monitor everything on a customer network—not just servers and workstations—and troubleshoot. 2. Stay on top of threats with features like MFA, antivirus, integrated endpoint detection and response, data backup, disk encryption, email protection,… | N/A |
| Checkmk | N-able N-central | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | $600 for up to 3,000 Services / around 100 hosts | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Checkmk | N-able N-central | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 73% Would buy again 11 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 79% Delivers good value for the price 11 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 80% Happy with the feature set 12 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 60% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 6 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 77% Implementation went as expected 10 Answers | |
| Checkmk | N-able N-central | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monitoring Tasks |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Management Tasks |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Reporting |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Security |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Checkmk | N-able N-central | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Amazon CloudWatch Score7.8 out of 10 | Avast CloudCare Score10 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | LogicMonitor Score8.9 out of 10 | Action1 Score9.4 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ManageEngine Site24x7 Score10 out of 10 | ManageEngine Endpoint Central Score9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Checkmk | N-able N-central | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 | 8.7 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.0 | 9.1 |
| Usability | 9.0 | 7.3 |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | 1.0 |
| Implementation Rating | 9.0 | 8.4 |
| Checkmk | N-able N-central | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
|
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | N-able N-central Screenshots |




