N-Able N-Central - A Worthwhile Investment.
Overall Satisfaction with N-able N-central
All our customers have the N-central client installed, so we can connect remotely and perform consistent monitoring for workstations and servers. The majority also have the 'pro' features enabled, allowing us to patch and perform additional tasks easily. The majority also use EDR, which is built into the interface and allows us to see if there are any problems in a single pane of glass - very helpful when you are managing a large IT estate.
Pros
- Remote Connection.
- Patching
- EDR
- Scripts/Automations.
- Monitoring
- Critical Event Alerting.
Cons
- Configuration of profiles and linking to customers.
- Standardisation and compliance levels.
- Speed of execution when running tasks and reporting back to inform where it's at, if it's stopped running, etc.
- Without N-Central, we wouldn't be able to manage the amount of customers we have.
- It allows us to grow and onboard additional customers easily.
- The licencing is reasonable and easy to cover within subscription costs.
Most advanced, and other technicians in the business already used it before. NinjaOne was a close competitor, but lacked some features that we ideally need. ITarian was too basic but was MUCH cheaper. For a startup MSP, it would be much more attractive. Splashtop was just for remote connections, which we used for some time before realizing full RMMs were a better fit for our requirements.
Do you think N-able N-central delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with N-able N-central's feature set?
Yes
Did N-able N-central live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of N-able N-central go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy N-able N-central again?
Yes

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation