CheckPoint vs. TicketLeap

CheckPoint performs well as an internal firewall between network zones, providing policy control and deep inspection of internal traffic. It works well for a multi network setup like ours across multiple sites. It is however not a fast changing interface and time needs to be taken to perform changes. It's not a quick as other vendors

Incentivized

Ideally suited for non-profits or small organizations that want to retain as much of their ticket revenues as possible, AND reduce the impact of fees on their patrons. You would also need to be EXTRA careful when setting up, it's hard to correct mistakes after the fact. e.g. not being able to change the order tickets are displayed, I literally had to delete tickets and re-enter them as new tickets to get them in the desired order

• Threat Prevention better than Fortinet
• Granularity of security policy can be customized to the maximum
• hardware performance is really good
• Bugs are less as compared to other vendors
• support is excellent
• modules work as expected
• Features can achieve out of box requirements

Incentivized

• Their fee structure is very competitive, particularly for tickets that are $5 or less
• Provides some flexibility with registration questions and specific ticket types

• In my experience, notifications are completely broken and non-functional
• In my opinion, confusing UX for the cloud portal
• Don't try and import 100's of endpoints when onboarding because it will create a mess
• When installing the CP client you have to remove Microsoft Defender and if that fails, CheckPoint technical support goes, "Not my problem, sucks to be you!"

Incentivized

• I think prtintable tickets when needed are currently not good, full page per ticket, ouch

Every dollar to CheckPoint is a wasted dollar.

Incentivized

the solution offer the most improvement about the usability by management more firewall in the same context or multicontext instead. The shared database allow to use one object for more than a package target of a cluster or more of gateways firewall. The management remain isolated from traffic pass through the firewall so the disruption is limited at minimum.

Incentivized

The CheckPoint Firewall and Cisco ISR router serve different purposes. Our organisation uses both devices, but in different areas of the topology. The Cisco ISR is a remote device and its function is to relay information to our edge firewall, which then passes to our internal firewall (CheckPoint) to securely control traffic requests.

Incentivized

Since Eventbrite changed their plans and how they charge for using their platform, it would have cost us a lot more to keep using it for a small number of events each year. Ticketleap was great because their fee assessments are lower than any other platform we could find, and with the ability to pass those on to the patron...we lowered the financial impact on those buyers as well.

• Smart console with lower operational overhead
• Compliance with Hipaa, PCISSS and saving on compliance plenties
• Less compatibility issues
• licensing model is costlier at the beginning
• Some modules require special training
• False positives may occur

Incentivized

• Increase profitability
• Reduced efficiencies