Cisco Aironet 3800 Series Access Points vs D-Link Wireless

Likelihood to Recommend

As any Cisco Aironet Access Points, the 3800 model is more for power users than beginners. It is for sure very more complex to maintain and trouble shoot than solutions like Cisco Meraki APs.

By the way, there are a lot of settings that can be customized and it is really interesting for difficult environments like industrial factories.

The 3800 model is also robust so it should stay durable and reliable.

But if you want to use the mesh mode or make a wireless bridge, this model is not appropriate as it is not supported for now.

Read full review

Verified User

Engineer in Engineering

Computer Networking Company, 10,001+ employees

View all 29 answers on this topic

Best in small networks & appropriate in industrial areas. AP works fine in any temperature & location (in remote locations office or remote location). Open area wireless connectivity is good with good range. Simple VLAN management and management are good. Backup and restoration is very good. Small home offices using wireless network work awesome.

Read full review

Irfan Ahmed

Deputy Manager

Pak Suzuki MotorsAutomotive, 1001-5000 employees

View all 1 answers on this topic

Pros

Cisco APs are managed very easily from a Cisco WLC controller.
Cisco APs provide lots of enterprise-grade options such as rogue detection and automatic power configuration.
Cisco APs have many different mounting options, which makes them very versatile in a healthcare environment.

Read full review

Verified User

Technician in Information Technology

Hospital & Health Care Company, 1001-5000 employees

View all 29 answers on this topic

Due to multiple switches in a single network environment, communication issues are common; therefore, productivity is effected. After installing D-Link Wireless, we resolved these kind of issues in our network.
One windows solution make management easy via D-Link Wireless.
Logs and troubleshooting is now easily handled. Pictorial form help in configuration and users management.

Read full review

Irfan Ahmed

Deputy Manager

Pak Suzuki MotorsAutomotive, 1001-5000 employees

View all 1 answers on this topic

Cons

Outdoor capabilities. We have actually blown up a few outdoor units. Water got inside the outdoor units and had visible rust
Costs compared to other AP’s in the market. Ruckus and EnGenius work out a bit cheaper
Mounting options are limited

Read full review

Ashveen Nandan

Manager Information & Communications Technolofy

Fiji AirportsAirlines/Aviation, 501-1000 employees

View all 29 answers on this topic

Hanging issues are common in large scale networks. Even wireless controller is hanged in peak hours.
Issues in VLAN configuration and port configurations.
Cost is high in front of other brands.

Read full review

Irfan Ahmed

Deputy Manager

Pak Suzuki MotorsAutomotive, 1001-5000 employees

View all 1 answers on this topic

Pricing Details

General

Free Trial

—

Free/Freemium Version

—

Premium Consulting/Integration Services

—

Entry-level set up fee?

No

Starting Price

—

General

Free Trial

—

Free/Freemium Version

—

Premium Consulting/Integration Services

—

Entry-level set up fee?

No

Starting Price

—

Likelihood to Renew

Cisco Aironet 3800 Series Access Points 7.9

Based on 3 answers

We are all happy with Aironet and Prime.

Read full review

Montasir Azad

Sr. Information Security Lead

Choice Hotels InternationalHospitality, 1001-5000 employees

View all 3 answers on this topic

No score

No answers yet

No answers on this topic

Performance

Cisco Aironet 3800 Series Access Points 9.4

Based on 2 answers

The Cisco 3802 product performance is excellent. Not only for the speed and range of the wireless it provides, but also for the fact that - when deployed in a large scale environment - the performance does not fail. It provides the same network connectivity for users ranging from 1 to 30-plus concurrent connections.

Read full review

Verified User

Project Manager in Information Technology

Oil & Energy Company, 1001-5000 employees

View all 2 answers on this topic

No score

No answers yet

No answers on this topic

Alternatives Considered

Our selection of Cisco Aironet Access Points versus the Meraki Access Points was entirely on a political basis with our vendor. In the future, we are actually looking to migrate towards the Meraki system. Even though the Meraki feature-set is lacking, we really only require those features, and our cost would be largely cut by this migration. It would be a solid win, but maybe not recommendable to everyone.

Read full review

Verified User

Engineer in Information Technology

Government Administration Company, 1001-5000 employees

View all 29 answers on this topic

We studied and selected D-Link due to usage in a limited area, and it is a very cost effective solution; therefore, D-Link Wireless AP and D-Link Wireless Controller [were] selected for our organization.We also [researched] Cisco, but Cisco was an expensive product and not appropriate in our required area or task; therefore, we selected D-Link.

Read full review

Irfan Ahmed

Deputy Manager

Pak Suzuki MotorsAutomotive, 1001-5000 employees

View all 1 answers on this topic

Scalability

Cisco Aironet 3800 Series Access Points 8.2

Based on 2 answers

Contrary to a solution like the Cisco Meraki access points, the Aironet access points like the 3800 are linked to the Controler. And depending on the version of the controller, it will support only some models of access points.

For big sites, it may be difficult to upgrade the controler to support new ap models like 3800 because we still have old access points.

And it is also the same between new access points and old client devices so it is always a bit tricky.

After that, if the access point model is supported by the controller, it is really simple to install a new one

Read full review

Verified User

Engineer in Engineering

Computer Networking Company, 10,001+ employees

View all 2 answers on this topic

No score

No answers yet

No answers on this topic

Return on Investment

Users are able to carry on with their work while moving, changing seats, rooms or having an ad-hoc Skype meeting on the way to lunch. It is always hard to justify the value of connectivity but be assured, when it is not working the business impact is immediate.

Read full review

Verified User

Consultant in Customer Service

Information Technology and Services Company, 10,001+ employees

View all 29 answers on this topic

Organizational needs are fulfilled [which] means return on investment.
Smooth connectivity increases productivity. Yes, we are satisfied in this area.
Management and troubleshooting are core features & very quick in production area.

Read full review

Irfan Ahmed

Deputy Manager

Pak Suzuki MotorsAutomotive, 1001-5000 employees

View all 1 answers on this topic

Cisco Aironet 3800 Series Access Points vs D-Link Wireless