Cisco and its Hotspots never disappoint.
Updated October 14, 2022
Cisco and its Hotspots never disappoint.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Aironet and Catalyst Access Points
We used Cisco Aironet and Catalyst Access Points in every legislative office. The focus was to provide coverage, individually, for each councilor in their room. Ensuring network quality, for web browsing and online meetings and events. We control access in a segmented way, with each room having a unique SSID, with access restricted to only the employees who worked there.
Pros
- Stable connection
- Definition of QoS, ensuring quality for online meetings
- Ease of installation
Cons
- Cost of access points
- Support and licensing cost
- 33 councilors satisfied with the quality of their wireless signal.
- Agility in communication and interaction between sectors.
The usage scenario was different. I don't see this as a benefit versus harm comparison, necessarily. What happened was that, at a certain point, the implementation of the cisco solution was the winner of our public bidding process and with that, we implemented it and have used it ever since.
Do you think Cisco Aironet 3800 Series Access Points (discontinued) delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Cisco Aironet 3800 Series Access Points (discontinued)'s feature set?
Yes
Did Cisco Aironet 3800 Series Access Points (discontinued) live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Cisco Aironet 3800 Series Access Points (discontinued) go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Cisco Aironet 3800 Series Access Points (discontinued) again?
Yes
Cisco Hybrid Work
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation