Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco CloudLock
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
CloudLock is a cloud security option acquired by Cisco in August 2016.N/A
Progress ShareFile
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
ShareFile is a cloud-based file sharing and storage service built for business. The product was acquired by Citrix Systems in 2011, and is now offered by Progress Software.
$52.80
per month 3 users (minimum)
Pricing
Cisco CloudLockProgress ShareFile
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Advanced
$17.60
per month per user (minimum 3 users)
Premium
$27.50
per month per user (minimum 3 users)
Industry Advantage
$45.83
per month per user (minimum 3 users)
Virtual Data Room
$75.00
per month per user (minimum 5 users)
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco CloudLockProgress ShareFile
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco CloudLockProgress ShareFile
Features
Cisco CloudLockProgress ShareFile
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Cisco CloudLock
-
Ratings
Progress ShareFile
7.6
90 Ratings
9% below category average
Versioning00 Ratings7.672 Ratings
Video files00 Ratings6.354 Ratings
Audio files00 Ratings5.749 Ratings
Document collaboration00 Ratings7.877 Ratings
Access control00 Ratings8.884 Ratings
File search00 Ratings8.085 Ratings
Device sync00 Ratings9.070 Ratings
Cloud Storage Security & Administration
Comparison of Cloud Storage Security & Administration features of Product A and Product B
Cisco CloudLock
-
Ratings
Progress ShareFile
8.9
85 Ratings
3% above category average
User and role management00 Ratings9.079 Ratings
File organization00 Ratings9.185 Ratings
Device management00 Ratings8.567 Ratings
Cloud Storage Platform
Comparison of Cloud Storage Platform features of Product A and Product B
Cisco CloudLock
-
Ratings
Progress ShareFile
8.4
86 Ratings
3% below category average
Performance00 Ratings8.182 Ratings
Reliability00 Ratings8.785 Ratings
Storage Reports00 Ratings8.568 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cisco CloudLockProgress ShareFile
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

SugarSync
SugarSync
Score 4.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Avanan
Avanan
Score 9.8 out of 10
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Avanan
Avanan
Score 9.8 out of 10
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco CloudLockProgress ShareFile
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(5 ratings)
8.2
(113 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(8 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
6.5
(26 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(14 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
1.0
(14 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(3 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
6.6
(2 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco CloudLockProgress ShareFile
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
Cisco Cloudlock is a good fit for my organization consisting of 150 end users. While we have a small office product that can expand to cover any size organization, I would assume the overhead to monitor would increase. While my organization's business is in real estate, I would highly recommend this for all businesses that handle sensitive and private data. Being able to monitor our cloud infrastructure has allowed our security team to be more flexible in allowing approved users access as well.
Read full review
Progress ShareFile
When we have a particularly large ad or job printing file that would "clog up" the email process, using ShareFile is very helpful. It's also useful for particular photographers we work with to upload a batch of photos all at once. Where it doesn't work as well for us is when trying to get clients to make use of a login to access folders. We find them reluctant to take on the learning curve. It works best for us when we just send them a clickable download link, and at most just require a tracking name and email address.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • Cisco CloudLock offers a remote access options, very efficient and standard.
  • Robust data security and monitoring of the sensitive database.
  • Has an excellent self service, which is an option for quick operational progress.
Read full review
Progress ShareFile
  • Secure File Storage and Sharing.
  • Workflows to get customer/affiliate responses to comments on documents.
  • I used to have the signature feature initially, but it was removed from the original plan, so I could only use it if I chose to select the higher plan price.
  • I love the upload notifications and reports on user activity.
  • The document storage versions are fantastic. I am the only user with Delete privileges, and I love that I can make those selections.
  • Integrations with Microsoft 365 - FANTASTIC - thank you.
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • Although alert mechanism is good but it delays a bit.
  • For implementation of DLP we had to hire a expert it took a lot of time to set up.
  • Support [in my experience] is not good.
Read full review
Progress ShareFile
  • The web console is not the most user friendly site to use to get to, and send my files.
  • We have had users that have not liked the change in workflow to get files from Progress ShareFile when they were used to just clicking on files on an email.
  • That management of the tools are not the most user friendly. There have been some improvements but keeping up with certs and setting up new users can be more work than expected.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Progress ShareFile
It's a highly effective and secure storage system, has robust workarounds for serving the various equipment limits of our users, meets high security requirements of HIPAA standards, significantly reduces our needs for producing paper trails.
Read full review
Usability
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Progress ShareFile
ShareFile is so easy to use I was able to download all of my projects files and have them set up to sync before my supervisor could even come over to explain the process to me. It is a neatly organized and intuitive software that allows even the less tech-savvy to become power users.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Progress ShareFile
The software has never been down when I needed to use it.
Read full review
Performance
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Progress ShareFile
Easy to use, easy to integrate with Outlook. I only gave it a 9 because I have found that sometimes it does not play nicely with Outlook and can slow it down. But, when that happens (not frequent), I restart Outlook and all is well again
Read full review
Support Rating
Cisco
They are very quick to respond and go the extra mile to help address our issues. That said, we've only needed them at the early stages of implementation for support help and occasionally when we want to do a full re-scan of our site. They are very flexible in working with us on the timing of such scans.
Read full review
Progress ShareFile
Citrix was generally responsive and helpful in solving technical issues. Like any cloud based SaaS product there is a danger that it may go down. This was a rare occurrence over my three years of using the product. The more common issue we encountered was clients forgetting their login which was easily managed through a forgot password functionality.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Progress ShareFile
Good documentation for the API. With a little help from RS tech staff, any competent programmer should be able to integrate RightSignature with an existing system in a week or three. That help is easy to get as well
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
Amazon Macie is limited to an AWS environment and fulfills some of the same functions that CloudLock does in SaaS products. Both are very valuable tools, so the decision is not really which to use, but whether to use both for their respective environments. In general I feel CloudLock is a more powerful tool because it connects to Microsoft 365, which is more business critical for our organization, but that really is a personal call.
Read full review
Progress ShareFile
ShareFile is easier and does what you need. I have moved a few organizations from SharePoint to ShareFile. Just easier. You can setup different areas for different departments, setup their permissions and it is easy enough for them to do what they want in their zones. The mobile app works great as well. So you can all the features you really use from SP, but just easier to setup and use.
Read full review
Scalability
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Progress ShareFile
I am a one person office. I have no idea how this software would scale to a larger office.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • Allowed data to be accessed.
  • Secured data.
  • Meet client security requirements.
Read full review
Progress ShareFile
  • All of our clients and consulting engineers find ShareFile easy to use, thus complementing our business.
  • Our staff also find ShareFile intuitive, accessible, and easy to use, making it an ideal, everyday indispensable desktop tool for everyone in our company.
  • ShareFile can be linked to our firm's primary website as a placed for private use. We haven't found need for this yet, but might in the future.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Progress ShareFile Screenshots

Screenshot of the ShareFile dashboardScreenshot of ShareFile's Outlook PluginScreenshot of the Projects interfaceScreenshot of ShareFile's link sharing optionsScreenshot of ShareFile's e-signature