Cisco Intersight vs. OpenText Hybrid Cloud Management X

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Intersight
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Intersight is an operations platform that helps IT operations teams control and automate Cisco UCS, converged, and hyperconverged infrastructure. Intersight consolidates and automates infrastructure lifecycle management from data centers to the edge in one solution delivered as-a-service.N/A
OpenText HCMX
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText™ HCMX delivers visibility and operational consistency across clouds, enabling users to optimize cloud spend based on actionable insights, enable self-service that includes compliance guardrails, and orchestrate lifecycle management actions.N/A
Pricing
Cisco IntersightOpenText Hybrid Cloud Management X
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco IntersightOpenText HCMX
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco IntersightOpenText Hybrid Cloud Management X
Features
Cisco IntersightOpenText Hybrid Cloud Management X
Cloud Management
Comparison of Cloud Management features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Intersight
-
Ratings
OpenText Hybrid Cloud Management X
9.0
2 Ratings
3% above category average
Cloud Management Security00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Automation and Orchestration00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Cost Management00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Cloud Management Performance Monitoring00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Governance and Compliance00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Systems Integration00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cisco IntersightOpenText Hybrid Cloud Management X
Small Businesses
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 8.5 out of 10
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic
Score 9.0 out of 10
IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 8.5 out of 10
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco IntersightOpenText Hybrid Cloud Management X
Likelihood to Recommend
9.4
(35 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.6
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.7
(8 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.9
(35 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
8.3
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
6.4
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Professional Services
8.4
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco IntersightOpenText Hybrid Cloud Management X
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
It is highly suited for an organisation pushing for a standardised and centralised configuration of settings using policies, profiles and templates. It is highly suited for customers used to legacy UMM that need to refresh their environment, but instead of deploying them in UMM (which is still possible), to take the time and effort to learn Cisco Intersight Infrastructure Service and IMM as well as familiarise themselves with the differences between UMM and IMM, and the issues in UMM which IMM addresses and improves upon. We deployed in UMM initially then transitioned to IMM with the transition too. I cannot think of a scenario where Cisco Intersight Infrastructure Service would not be suited. Even for small-scale deployments, it provides significant benefits. Maybe if you come from another server vendor management environment, the learning curve may feel steep (e.g. many new concepts and constructs that one has to master).
Read full review
OpenText
The best solution for the data processing and other Cloud operations acceleration software which allows data import from other various tools and the production of different operations reports using this Micros Focus platform is amazing. Data analytics which the solution offers are the best and quickly generated and the best cost management product.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • Standardising the environment by enforcing use of updating templates.
  • Show the difference on a profile between what has changed and what setting was last deployed.
  • Perform bulk deploy operation on profiles (like server profiles).
  • Policies underpin all settings (e.g. no more defining individual VLANs before being able to use them, or having to clean them up manually when they are no longer in use. You deploy a Domain VLAN policy that states which VLANs are configured on a domain (either standalone) or a domain profile template (if domains profiles are bound to an updating domain profile template).
Read full review
OpenText
  • The excellent file organizing.
  • Reports are the best and profitable.
  • Storage system management is effective.
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • It is difficult to spot an added or removed VLAN in an Ethernet Network Group Policy or VLAN Policy. The comparison widget will show you that something has changed, but if you have 100s of VLANs, the difference does not stand out. Workaround: we copy the data out and compare it in a text editor.
  • If you are transitioning from UMM to IMM, you lose some functionality like vNIC redundancy pairs.
  • It is not easy to map the UMM version 4.x server firmware version to the equivalent IMM version 5.x firmware version.
  • It is not possible to configure out-of-band management IP addresses on a per-domain basis. You have to configure these ranges via an IMC Access policy (which contains the IP address range/pool) on the server profile. This leads to "server profile template sprawl" where we have to maintain multiple server profile templates since our domains sit on different ranges, even though the servers are for the most part configured identically.
  • UCS domains in IMM only support one Ethernet Network Group Policy (VLAN group) per vNIC template.
Read full review
OpenText
  • Only to those getting started it can take time.
  • Configurations of the system functionalities.
  • The technical team response.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cisco
Been using Cisco Software as a service (SaaS) platform in a production environment for a large medical and health professionals that has critical healthcare and patients care dependency.
Support team is very helpful getting system updated as needed, and vendor support is fantastic. Also get a dedicated Cisco networking engine to review and advise system health and recommendations.
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Usability
Cisco
Usability of Cisco Intersight is highly dependent on the licensing purchased. The default (free) license level provides a lot of value for the minimal amount of effort to implement. The paid license levels provide additional features (detailed inventory, configuration management and deployment, etc.)
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Cisco
I have had servers TAC cases open for issues with Cisco Intersight. Some have yet to be resolved. One case that is still open is where the HCL status ( Hardware Compatibility List ) shows not validated when It should be. We have several servers that have the exact same hardware, OS, and the same firmware. One server will show the HCL is not validated but all others will
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Cisco
You really need a lab to get hands on but it was useful
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Cisco
Very smooth process and we did it for 2 data centers
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
I personally think that Cisco Intersight Infrastructure Service is at the top of its class when it comes to managing data center hardware. The cloud-connected design feels very modern and easy to use. The mobile app is something I wouldn't expect to get in a server management tool. The way it can update, monitor, and manage our servers is very nice. Overall, we are very happy with it.
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • The negative thing is that we prefer to use the UCS Manager in our company because this bare metal is integrated into the FI and no extra appliance is required. SaaS is generally not viewed favorably in Germany.
  • Telling the user that they have to buy Intersight licenses even if they use UCS Manager annoys our customers.
Read full review
OpenText
  • It has been easy creating reliable and productive reports.
  • We can move a large amount of multiple data formats.
  • Secure data storage and secure data management platform.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Cisco Intersight Screenshots

Screenshot of the Intersight dashboard, which provides out-of-the box summaries of real-time health and performance data across data center and edge infrastructure. Users can customize the dashboard with a library of widgets to quickly see information that's most important to them.Screenshot of the security advisories and field notices that alert users about endpoint devices in their environment that are impacted along with recommended resolution.Screenshot of the Topology Views that let users quickly identify any UCS domain connectivity issues thorugh a visual representation.Screenshot of an example of the automated workflows that users can create, using Intersight's drag-and-drop workflow designer and library of tasks and workflows.Screenshot of an example of the aggregated and visualized metrics that are collected for fabric interconnects, chassis, and servers to monitor devices, optimize performance, identify bottlenecks, and proactively address any potential issues.