TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cisco Meraki SD-WAN

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/ACisco Meraki SD-WAN is a cloud-managed solution that simplifies and secures wide area networking across branch, campus, and remote locations. Built on Meraki’s dashboard, it delivers centralized visibility, automation, and traffic optimization without the complexity of traditional WAN deployments. The solution improves application performance by dynamically routing traffic based on real-time conditions, integrating advanced security, and providing seamless multicloud connectivity. With support…N/A
    Pricing
    Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
    Free Trial
    No
    Free/Freemium Version
    No
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    No
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
    Considered Both Products
    Cisco
    Chose Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
    We have used Silver Peak in the past but it was incredibly expensive and cumbersome to deploy. It required travel to the remote site by IT staff and was built on a platform that wasn't friendly to remote access. The cost of Meraki SD-WAN was easily a tenth of the cost of …
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
    I mean, I’ve used a couple of other products, like there’s a Meraki competitor called Ubiquiti. I’ve used their product as well. The biggest difference between Ubiquiti and Meraki is that Meraki has out-of-the-box cloud support, whereas Ubiquiti requires you to configure it to …
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
    They fit different scenarios, while Meraki is really easy to use and to deploy It lacks some feature that in some scenarios you really require specific features like nat combined with vpn or fine tuning with BGP or third party site to site integrations.That increases the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
    Better overall performance and ease of access.
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
    We used CheckPoint Hub and Spoke Technology, but it's not ethical. That is the one or better CheckPoint, I think.
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
    nice
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
    For certain environments, Meraki SD-WAN fits the purpose and easier than other solutions to deploy and support.
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
    It adds an end to end solution
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
    Cisco Meraki SD-WAN is the market leader.
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
    Cloud Native, dashboard being single pane of glass.
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
    User interface is much simpler and management features are more mature.
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
    Cisco Meraki SD-WAN is by far the most end user friendly solution.
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
    The facility for the management
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
    The Sonicwall zero touch model is in its infancy compared to Cisco Meraki SD-WAN.
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
    Cisco Meraki SD-WAN is way more easy to configure as they do not use a command line interface, but a graphical user interface. Cisco Meraki SD-WAN also has configuration templates, which allows for multiple devices configuration with much less effort than conventional command …
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
    I like the ease of use of Cisco Meraki SD-WAN better.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    95%
    Would buy again
    78 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    99%
    Delivers good value for the price
    78 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    94%
    Happy with the feature set
    77 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    96%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    68 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    77 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
    Score8.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.7
    (87 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.1
    (2 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    8.1
    (85 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Cisco
    I believe it is well suited for "pop-up" offices of a small number of people. 5 to 10 is ideal. It can be setup with a minimum of involvement from the IT infrastructure group. It is a very simple way to connect a remote site securely and quickly with the confidence that the connection will be stable. I believe it is less suited for a large organization requiring complex routing and routing protocols. It only works with Meraki endpoints and so there must be Meraki firewalls at both ends. It cannot be used with IPSEC tunnels
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Cisco
    • I really like the firewalls and the access points, like the wireless ones. From a wireless access point perspective, we recently moved to the new MR57s, multi-gig bandwidth as well as Wi-Fi 6, which helps users connect wirelessly regardless of where they sit in the office. The experience they get doesn’t matter wherever they move—it’s fantastic. So we’ve moved from the previous iteration of Meraki Access Points to the new iteration, like two weeks ago, and we’ve seen a major shift in the user experience.
    Read full review
    Cons
    Cisco
    • I personally think that this particular place is on the logging side. I have seen where the event log is that what they call in terms of capturing all the log events is the area which I personally feel can actually be improved. Even this could be similar, like how I said about packet capture where you could have a flexibility of having a high level information or deep level regardless you should have that kind of option where you could also see the logging site as granular as per the requirement. So that's the area which I think is a bit little behind compared to other vendors.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Cisco
    Because so far the solution showed great stability during the time, easy to use and deploy. There is still room for improvements like adding a smarter way to manage the policies to apply to the tunneled traffic, today the way to configure and manage them is quite old style, It would be better an "object" oriented way to create them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Cisco
    Its usable very well
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Cisco
    Fast and efficient. The only issue currently is that the support is only overseas support and not in South Africa, which causes delays in resolution for some cases. Escalating issues is quite simple and the opening of new cases from the dashboard is easy. I have never had a support issue that could not be resolved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Cisco
    We did a very stringent valuation a few years ago. And we evaluated probably about a dozen suppliers on paper that we evaluate just by capabilities. And, we of some other business criteria, and we whittled that down to a list of five. And out of those five, we brought four of those into our lab environment where we ran approximately 350 different test cases on, we really beat on it pretty heavily. And some of those other suppliers would've been companies like Fortinet Versa Networks Silver Peak, which is now owned by Hewlett Packard.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Cisco
    With the implementation of Cisco Meraki SD-WAN on our new site, this has enabled us to optimize the bandwidth of our 3 links. Thanks to this, updates pushed by Microsoft Intune, such as Microsoft CRM operations, are running smoothly. The same applies to SAP and our Teams meetings. And I almost forgot our Cisco telephone system.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Cisco
    • Cisco Meraki SD-WAN gave us a new perspective on SDN, ZTP and other automation tools we didn't have before
    • The sizing of Meraki MX series cannot compete very large and robust networks, only if we use virtual appliances. In this case, I would recommend on other vendors like Fortinet
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots