49 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.6 out of 100
55 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.8 out of 100

Feature Set Ratings

  • Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP) ranks higher in 1 feature set: Endpoint Security

Endpoint Security

7.9

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

79%
9.5

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)

95%
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP) ranks higher in 7/7 features

Anti-Exploit Technology

8.0
80%
17 Ratings
9.3
93%
6 Ratings

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

7.9
79%
17 Ratings
9.6
96%
6 Ratings

Centralized Management

8.7
87%
17 Ratings
9.6
96%
6 Ratings

Hybrid Deployment Support

7.2
72%
6 Ratings
9.4
94%
5 Ratings

Infection Remediation

7.6
76%
17 Ratings
9.3
93%
6 Ratings

Vulnerability Management

7.1
71%
17 Ratings
9.6
96%
6 Ratings

Malware Detection

8.7
87%
17 Ratings
9.6
96%
6 Ratings

Attribute Ratings

  • Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP) is rated higher in 2 areas: Likelihood to Recommend, Support Rating

Likelihood to Recommend

8.2

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

82%
17 Ratings
9.0

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)

90%
8 Ratings

Usability

8.1

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

81%
12 Ratings

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)

N/A
0 Ratings

Support Rating

8.0

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

80%
20 Ratings
8.8

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)

88%
9 Ratings

Likelihood to Recommend

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

Cisco Secure Endpoint is a very good endpoint protection solution. It would be particularly good for someone with the time and ability to really work with it to get the most out of it. This would include the other Cisco product integrations and systems that it works well with.
Jeff Collins | TrustRadius Reviewer

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)

Small or large organizations will benefit from using MDE. They need to provide a way to buy MDE as a standalone add-on product not only make it a bundled feature in Microsoft 365 E5. I wish it had the ability to deploy updates to 3rd party apps when the vulnerability scanner discovers a vulnerability. Currently, I have to use a 3rd party tool to address this gap.
Joe Aldeguer | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pros

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

  • Identifies malware, malicious processes/services and other events well
  • Great automated actions features such as host isolation
  • Detailed threat visibility such as file trajectory
  • Integration with other Cisco suite of security products
  • Great value
  • Low false positive rate
  • Lightweight agent
  • Variety of reporting
  • Stable agent
Randy Zuehlke | TrustRadius Reviewer

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)

  • It is great at proactively monitoring threats across the network. It works seamlessly with the client to monitor individual user computers, and it has a good real-time scanning engine.
  • On the client side, Windows Defender doesn't require a whole lot of system resources to run, nor will it create unnessary slowdowns of a computer, even while scanning for threats
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Cons

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

  • Event search function. The searching is very limited and allows for poor filtering choices.
  • Slowness. The web GUI is far slower than most Cisco products.
  • Sync issues. When attempting to move a device from one group to another or start isolation on a device, there is a sizable delay in communication with the device that can cause operations to fail.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)

  • Virus detection rates are below competitors.
  • Too many notifications that end up bothering.
  • Do not ask every time if you should send reports to Microsoft.
Danilo Soares Peres | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pricing Details

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Starting Price

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP) Editions & Modules

Additional Pricing Details

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Starting Price

$250 per user/per month

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP) Editions & Modules

Edition
Standalone5.201
Academic2.501
  1. per user/per month
Additional Pricing Details

Usability

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP) 8.1
Based on 12 answers
AMP is very difficult to use compared to other products we've seen. It's hard to understand why there are so many different logins for the various products that supposedly integrate with AMP. We had weekly phone calls for months to implement the product yet none of the IT department really enjoys using this product or feels comfortable with the accuracy of detections. The number of false positives is high.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Support Rating

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP) 8.0
Based on 20 answers
Like most Cisco products, Cisco Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) for Endpoints has a great knowledge base on Cisco's community portal, but unfortunately the Cisco support team cannot always clearly describe the solution for your issue, especially if it is related to the demo period. Nevertheless, Cisco goes to great efforts to improve your current situation with Cisco Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) for Endpoints support.
Oleksandr Tsapenko | TrustRadius Reviewer

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP) 8.8
Based on 9 answers
Every time I've had a question or a problem, I was able to get it addressed quickly. Microsoft has a huge database for ATP support, and it has contained 90% of what I have looked for. It was a lifesaver during initial setup.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Alternatives Considered

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

Being all products of a similar nature, Cisco Advance Malware Protection stands out for its simplicity, low resource consumption, reporting, work dashboards and integration with the rest of the already installed suit.
Those are the most notable aspects, although the rest of the solutions were very good, all the capabilities added together make this product surpassing.
Sebastián Sarasate | TrustRadius Reviewer

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)

Defender works better for my org. This may depend on your ecosystem, however for me, Defender is a clear winner. I like Defender's ability to utilize multiple sensors and data points to detect possible breaches. I like the built-in EDR functionality. I do not need to purchase a separate EDR software anymore. I really like the vulnerability management. it has enabled our SOC team to view multiple security-related sensors from a single portal.
Ali Marandi | TrustRadius Reviewer

Return on Investment

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

  • AMP has been able to catch some serious infections and stop them from doing huge damage in our environment.
  • The overall cost of AMP vs the cost of not having this protection and getting hit with malware, or other nefarious damage to your environment is well worth the money.
Nicole McMillian | TrustRadius Reviewer

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)

  • There is definitely a piece of mind provided when you know that your system will not get compromised because of malware and viruses.
  • The fact that I don't have to spend money in the first place means that I can spend money on other more important things that do require it.
Tanish Pruthi | TrustRadius Reviewer

Add comparison