31 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.5 out of 100
28 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.4 out of 100

Likelihood to Recommend

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

Specific tool for specific need. If you have a gap in your security infrastructure (protection from malware) you might think to use Cisco Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) for Endpoints to make sure your company's devices are safe. But also you can go beyond and enforce your SOC with Cisco AnyConnect where Cisco Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) for Endpoints is used as one of modules.
Oleksandr Tsapenko | TrustRadius Reviewer

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)

It would be well suited in an environment where most all your endpoints are Windows-based computers, as Windows Defender is already built into the operating system, so there is no client to have to worry about installing. It also will make the management of endpoints easier on the server side, if most all machines are Windows-based.It might be less of ideal solution if a company/organization were looking for something more robust, or had a lot more features/configuration settings. It also might be less ideal for a company/organization that was looking for a product that didn't have a high detection rate of false positives
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Feature Rating Comparison

Endpoint Security

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)
8.0
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)
8.2
Anti-Exploit Technology
Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)
7.9
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)
8.0
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)
8.4
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)
8.4
Centralized Management
Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)
9.0
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)
8.9
Hybrid Deployment Support
Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)
7.1
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)
6.8
Infection Remediation
Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)
7.4
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)
8.0
Vulnerability Management
Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)
7.6
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)
8.6
Malware Detection
Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)
8.7
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)
8.5

Pros

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

  • lightweight connector
  • great integration with other security products
  • highly effective
  • will also alert for vulnerable software being used on your systems
Wouter Hindriks | TrustRadius Reviewer

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)

  • Low impact on computer performance.
  • Easy-to-use interface.
  • Several settings that help you customize the software.
Danilo Soares Peres | TrustRadius Reviewer

Cons

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

  • Sometimes during whitelisting, other files from security tools get isolated even if it's not user intended.
  • Re-syncing policies also take some time, albeit in a straightforward process.
  • As with all security software, false-positives are still detected.
  • Hoping that once the library is expanded further, the false positives will be fewer.
Ericson Aragoza | TrustRadius Reviewer

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)

  • Deployment: We've had some issues deploying, especially outside of the Windows environment.
  • Offboarding: There is currently no way to delete a computer. They disappear over time. We even renamed a computer, and it kept both the old and new name in there. Eventually, the older machines do go away, but there is no manual way to do this at the moment.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Usability

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP) 8.5
Based on 4 answers
I give it a very good score due to its simplicity in deployment, actually being able to do everything remotely is very good. Also noteworthy is the low consumption of resources compared to other competitive products.
Cisco support is really very remarkable and the tool has a good integration with other products, a very good work dashboard and very useful reporting.
Sebastián Sarasate | TrustRadius Reviewer

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Support Rating

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP) 8.1
Based on 12 answers
We have needed very little support, but anytime we need to reach out for assistance they have always been helpful and knowledgeable about the product and helped us resolve any issues or needs we may have
Nicole McMillian | TrustRadius Reviewer

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP) 8.0
Based on 8 answers
I gave it a 7 out of 10 as I feel that there is still a lot of room for improvement. I remember how back in the day the software was looked down upon because of it being an unreliable and inefficient antivirus. But, Microsoft has really put in the hard work and made it worthy for it to be comparable to all the other security services out there.
Tanish Pruthi | TrustRadius Reviewer

Alternatives Considered

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

AMP is far superior to Symantec in my opinion. It is much more robust and customizable. It is much easier to manage systems and to spot trouble areas. Deploying and upgrading clients is much simpler. It is a much more lightweight client on the desktop. Overall a much better product in my opinion.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)

MS ATP is lower on system resources and enables us to stretch out our endpoint hardware for an additional year. Also, MS ATP being an MS product fits in very nicely into MS remote management software and MS operating system. We have had little to no issues when hotfixes and roll updates are deployed, unlike 3rd party AV providers that we had experience with in the past.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Return on Investment

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

  • HAMP has allowed the team to focus on value added activities instead of constant cleanup of workstations and servers.
  • AMP is probably not the most cost effective solution, but is very good at protecting your systems.
Scott Shipley | TrustRadius Reviewer

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)

  • A positive impact has been to increase productivity for IT staff, as it saves them time from having to install/configure clients on every endpoint.
  • Another positive impact has been on the user/client side, as it helps the user to increase their productivity with working on their computer, as the Windows Defender client uses little resources to run on the system, and has a tendecy to not slowdown systems
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pricing Details

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP) Editions & Modules

Additional Pricing Details

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP) Editions & Modules

Edition
Standalone5.201
Academic2.501
  1. per user/per month
Additional Pricing Details

Rating Summary

Likelihood to Recommend

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)
8.1
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)
8.3

Usability

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)
8.5
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)

Support Rating

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)
8.1
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)
8.0

Add comparison