49 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.6 out of 100
39 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.4 out of 100

Feature Set Ratings

    Endpoint Security

    7.9

    Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

    79%

    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR (Traps)

    Feature Set Not Supported
    N/A
    Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP) ranks higher in 7/7 features

    Anti-Exploit Technology

    8.0
    80%
    17 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

    7.9
    79%
    17 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Centralized Management

    8.7
    87%
    17 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Hybrid Deployment Support

    7.2
    72%
    6 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Infection Remediation

    7.6
    76%
    17 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Vulnerability Management

    7.1
    71%
    17 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Malware Detection

    8.7
    87%
    17 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Attribute Ratings

    • Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP) is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend
    • Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR (Traps) is rated higher in 1 area: Support Rating

    Likelihood to Recommend

    8.2

    Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

    82%
    17 Ratings
    7.9

    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR (Traps)

    79%
    12 Ratings

    Usability

    8.1

    Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

    81%
    12 Ratings

    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR (Traps)

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Support Rating

    8.0

    Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

    80%
    20 Ratings
    10.0

    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR (Traps)

    100%
    5 Ratings

    Likelihood to Recommend

    Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

    Cisco Secure Endpoint is a very good endpoint protection solution. It would be particularly good for someone with the time and ability to really work with it to get the most out of it. This would include the other Cisco product integrations and systems that it works well with.
    Jeff Collins | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR (Traps)

    Malware that doesn’t leave files behind has become widely available. Anyone who can afford to reverse this trend should purchase technology. Application whitelisting isn’t for everyone, and Palo Alto Networks Traps can help. Enterprises looking for a low-affected, next-generation solution with high protection should consider it. PAN Traps is a great product at a reasonable price, and I highly recommend it.
    Mst Rahima Khatun | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Pros

    Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

    • Identifies malware, malicious processes/services and other events well
    • Great automated actions features such as host isolation
    • Detailed threat visibility such as file trajectory
    • Integration with other Cisco suite of security products
    • Great value
    • Low false positive rate
    • Lightweight agent
    • Variety of reporting
    • Stable agent
    Randy Zuehlke | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR (Traps)

    • Direct Access to devices via Live Terminal which provides operations with scripting, triage, and preservation of artifacts.
    • Behavioral Indicators of Compromise which provides alerts on events regarding groups of hosts and their signatures.
    • Querying complex data sets involving a variety of devices for network connections, hashes, DNS, etc.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Cons

    Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

    • Event search function. The searching is very limited and allows for poor filtering choices.
    • Slowness. The web GUI is far slower than most Cisco products.
    • Sync issues. When attempting to move a device from one group to another or start isolation on a device, there is a sizable delay in communication with the device that can cause operations to fail.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR (Traps)

    • Traps doesn't seem to function as a traditional A/V very well, so it's better as another layer to your endpoint protection
    • Traps can cause issues with some legacy or custom programs, so exceptions may have to be made
    • Traps falsely identifies things as malicious at times, this is not often though
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Pricing Details

    Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

    General

    Free Trial
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    Entry-level set up fee?
    No

    Starting Price

    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR (Traps)

    General

    Free Trial
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    Entry-level set up fee?
    No

    Starting Price

    Usability

    Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

    Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP) 8.1
    Based on 12 answers
    AMP is very difficult to use compared to other products we've seen. It's hard to understand why there are so many different logins for the various products that supposedly integrate with AMP. We had weekly phone calls for months to implement the product yet none of the IT department really enjoys using this product or feels comfortable with the accuracy of detections. The number of false positives is high.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR (Traps)

    No score
    No answers yet
    No answers on this topic

    Support Rating

    Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

    Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP) 8.0
    Based on 20 answers
    Like most Cisco products, Cisco Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) for Endpoints has a great knowledge base on Cisco's community portal, but unfortunately the Cisco support team cannot always clearly describe the solution for your issue, especially if it is related to the demo period. Nevertheless, Cisco goes to great efforts to improve your current situation with Cisco Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) for Endpoints support.
    Oleksandr Tsapenko | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR (Traps)

    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR (Traps) 10.0
    Based on 5 answers
    The support we receive from Palo Alto is one of the best aspects of Traps. It is very easy to recommend their support. It seems much easier to connect directly with someone with a deep understanding of the product rather than other companies where you basically have to make an airtight case that it is some kind of non-standard issue that can't be solved with existing documentation. Palo Alto digs deep and helps with advanced troubleshooting to get things working.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Alternatives Considered

    Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

    Being all products of a similar nature, Cisco Advance Malware Protection stands out for its simplicity, low resource consumption, reporting, work dashboards and integration with the rest of the already installed suit.
    Those are the most notable aspects, although the rest of the solutions were very good, all the capabilities added together make this product surpassing.
    Sebastián Sarasate | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR (Traps)

    Traps is the slickest interface, easy to use and intuitive rule making, and the rest just didn't quite stack up to the performance level of Traps. McAfee and Kaspersky just hog processor and RAM power. I didn't like the interface and functionality of SentinelOne as much as Traps. Palo Alto really put a lot of time into the development of this software, and had some of the founding fathers of IT Security heading the development process. Can't beat that.
    DeForge, Peter | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Return on Investment

    Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)

    • AMP has been able to catch some serious infections and stop them from doing huge damage in our environment.
    • The overall cost of AMP vs the cost of not having this protection and getting hit with malware, or other nefarious damage to your environment is well worth the money.
    Nicole McMillian | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR (Traps)

    • After putting Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR on a user's system, users came back with a positive response that there are no performance issues now.
    • We are able to track and control granular suspicious and malicious activities.
    • Web controls are missing, which if they would have been there would have been very helpful.
    Darshil Sanghvi | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Add comparison