Cisco Secure Workload vs. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisco Secure Workload | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | The Cisco Secure Workload (formerly Tetration) platform offers holistic workload protection for multicloud data centers by enabling a zero-trust model using segmentation. This approach allows users to identify security incidents faster, contain lateral movement, and reduce the attack surface. Tetration's infrastructure-agnostic approach supports both on-premises and public cloud workloads. | N/A |
Forcepoint DLP | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) protects sensitive data everywhere it resides and moves, across endpoints, cloud apps, web, email, and on-premises environments. It delivers unified policy management and centralized control from a single console. | N/A |
| Cisco Secure Workload | Forcepoint DLP | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Cisco Secure Workload software is licensed based on the number of workload equivalents or devices (endpoints) depending on the agent or sensor type being used. Telemetry data can be collected using agents, supported by other supported sensors or collectors, in any combination. Policy enforcement is enabled through agents with enforcement capability with infrastructure enforcement delivered through Cisco Secure Firewall Integration, Application Delivery Controllers (ADCs), and Security Groups in public cloud infrastructure or orchestrated via streamed Kafka policy. Workload is defined as a virtual machine, bare-metal server, or container host and includes server and desktop operating systems. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Cisco Secure Workload | Forcepoint DLP | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 87% Would buy again 20 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 87% Delivers good value for the price 20 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 91% Happy with the feature set 21 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 12 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 85% Implementation went as expected 17 Answers | |
| Cisco Secure Workload | Forcepoint DLP | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data Preparation |
| |||||||
| Cisco Secure Workload | Forcepoint DLP | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic | Symantec Data Loss Prevention Score7.3 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | Symantec Data Loss Prevention Score7.3 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Cisco Secure Workload | Forcepoint DLP | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.3 | 7.7 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 7.6 |
| Usability | - | 7.7 |
| Support Rating | - | 5.3 |
| Cisco Secure Workload | Forcepoint DLP | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | Cisco Secure Workload Screenshots |






