TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Claris FileMaker vs. Microsoft Build of OpenJDK vs. Oracle Java SE Subscription

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Claris FileMaker

    Score6.7 out of 10
    N/AClaris' FileMaker is presented as a Workplace Innovation Platform, and is used to create a custom app. Manual processes can be automated with Claris FileMaker Pro, and apps can be created to manage contacts, track inventory, organize projects, etc.

    $21

    per month per user

    Microsoft Build of OpenJDK

    Score7.8 out of 10
    N/AThe Microsoft Build of OpenJDK is a no-cost distribution of OpenJDK that's open source and available for free for anyone to deploy anywhere. It includes Long-Term Support (LTS) binaries for Java 11 and Java 17 on x64 server and desktop environments on macOS, Linux, and Windows, AArch64/ARM64 on Linux and Windows, binaries for macOS on Apple Silicon (AArch64/M1), and musl libc compiled binaries for Alpine Linux on x64.

    $0

    Oracle Java SE Subscription

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/AOracle Java SE Subscription combines license and support into a subscription to enable users to manage Java SE installations, updates and upgrades across the enterprise. The former Java SE Advanced, Java SE Advanced Desktop, and Java SE Suite products have transitioned to a Java SE Subscriptions. Beyond the unlicensed version, purchasers of Oracle Java SE Subscription receive all-hours access to My Oracle Support, enterprise monitoring, management, and deployment features, and early access to…

    $2.50

    per named user per month

    Pricing
    Claris FileMakerMicrosoft Build of OpenJDKOracle Java SE Subscription
    Editions & Modules
    Platform Subscription
    $21
    per month per user
    Individual desktop license
    $594
    one-time fee
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle Java SE Desktop Subscription
    $2.50
    per named user per month
    Oracle Java SE Subscription
    $25
    per core per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Claris FileMakerMicrosoft Build of OpenJDKOracle Java SE Subscription
    Free Trial
    NoNoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsVolume discounts also available.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Claris FileMakerMicrosoft Build of OpenJDKOracle Java SE Subscription
    Considered Multiple Products
    Claris
    No answer on this topic
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Oracle
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    93%
    Would buy again
    13 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    93%
    Would buy again
    63 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    83%
    Delivers good value for the price
    10 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    92%
    Delivers good value for the price
    60 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    86%
    Happy with the feature set
    12 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    94%
    Happy with the feature set
    64 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    89%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    42 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    11 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Implementation went as expected
    61 Answers
    Features
    Claris FileMakerMicrosoft Build of OpenJDKOracle Java SE Subscription
    Low-Code Development
    Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Claris FileMaker and Microsoft Build of OpenJDK and Oracle Java SE Subscription
    Feature
    Claris FileMaker
    7.9
    4 Ratings
    6% below category average
    Microsoft Build of OpenJDK
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle Java SE Subscription
    -
    Ratings
    Visual Modeling8.44 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Drag-and-drop Interfaces3.73 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform Security9.83 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform User Management7.64 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reusability8.64 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform Scalability9.64 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Claris FileMakerMicrosoft Build of OpenJDKOracle Java SE Subscription
    Small Businesses
    Zoho Creator
    Score7.7 out of 10
    GraalVM
    Score9.1 out of 10
    GraalVM
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    AppSheet
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Oracle Java SE
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Oracle Java SE
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Oracle APEX
    Score9.1 out of 10
    GraalVM
    Score9.1 out of 10
    GraalVM
    Score9.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Claris FileMakerMicrosoft Build of OpenJDKOracle Java SE Subscription
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (51 ratings)
    7.5
    (2 ratings)
    8.6
    (68 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    5.0
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    8.8
    (8 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    1.0
    (6 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.4
    (57 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    5.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Claris FileMakerMicrosoft Build of OpenJDKOracle Java SE Subscription
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Claris
    If your company is really small, I can understand the need for a product like this. However, I would go for MS Access... FileMaker Pro can not be integrated with other systems (like MS Access can at least be handled by C# for instance, and can be integrated with MS Excel or even SQL server). I'm really not sure in what scenario one would choose for FileMaker Pro. If your application or company grows bigger, you're going to have a problem to move to another environment. Also, the fact that only one person can work with the backend at any given time is a problem in a somewhat larger company.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    I think of a few areas when looking at Microsoft Build of OpenJDK. The first is what is your cost to run for your intended product or project, if you are strapped and fall within the supported areas of Microsoft Build of OpenJDK then it's a no brainer, Microsoft Build of OpenJDK is for you! Lastly, I think of support in the respect to running into a wall and needing a fix. It can take a while for open source tools to produce fixes that the community warrants, so again if you aren't strapped for time and haven't run into a wall and could afford to wait for fixes or relevant patches then again Microsoft Build of OpenJDK is for you. Not everyone has this luxury, but these are a few areas to think about.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    The Oracle Java SE Subscription is a useful service that can support larger organizations that need to implement quick feature development and need to do so with maximum support with minimal fuss. Performance can vary due to the nature of Javas JVM having to boot upon every start and there can be some compatibility issues with a few third-party systems. Smaller organizations would be better off utilizing Java SDK or OpenJDK as these are free but don't have the benefit of direct support from Oracle. If a larger organization has a long history of using Java and has legacy systems running on older versions of Java, then the extra support needed will more than justify the cost If you are heavily invested in Java and need to support applications running on older versions such as Java 8, or you want to use OracleJDK, then you would want to consider getting the subscription for its support and patches.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Claris
    • The relational database management system makes the program highly customizable to fit the needs of any product. You can add a ton of information to each record and update your inventory on a regular basis with an Excel import or manually inside of the record. It has the capability to incorporate barcoding, which can manage your available inventory with ease.
    • The scripting language allows FileMaker to automatically calculate complex algorithms automatically or generate report outs with the click of a button. This allows for greater UI, especially with active users who are not familiar with writing code. Almost all of our internal data is linked to the FileMaker database
    • The server license allows many users to update the database in real time, which is handy if your inventory is constantly changing. We have users with Macs, PCs, iPhones and handheld tablets linked to our FileMaker database and they are updating the information constantly throughout the day.
    • If you invest some time into formatting and scripting the database, there is a high ease of use for users without knowledge of any programming or FileMaker itself.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Support for the Java libraries that are common use today
    • Support for various architecture environments - Mac, Windows, Linux, etc...
    • Provides a low cost or rather no cost alternative
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Collect in an inventory all versions of Java that have been used in different applications.
    • Determine the status of old versions of Java and update or apply essential security patches.
    • Oracle Support is the best to be able to solve problems in an agile and safe way.
    • Fast update cycles to make new features available.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Claris
    • Developer features need to be beefed up - namely adding the ability to search code for a phrase or keyword and the ability to do the same in the "relationship graph" in the database.
    • Add ability for users to edit the same table record at the same time by version control.
    • Allow Filemaker Server to use more than 1 core; currently multi-processing is not supported and it can be tricky to find just the right server to support the application you've built to the fullest capacity.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Since it's open source, enterprise support is less than as if you are running paid like an Oracle JDK.
    • Performance is improving and is I would say on par with paid solutions, this could improve to help with growth.
    • Stability will happen over time with more contributions and fixes
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • AMC Usage details hard to Decipher and Categorize
    • AMC JRE Upgrades have very limited Scheduling of Deployments, should be more like SCCM. Where you know exactly when deployments are going out. Not just when the Agent decides to check in.
    • Cost is WAY too high
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Claris
    It it not really up to me but my opinion does have some weight in the decision and the reason I would renew my use FileMaker Pro 8.5 is because I am finally getting used to it! Now that I have been working with the program, tasks have become quicker and projects are getting done faster. File Maker Pro 8.5 really is a versatile tool and I think we are just scratching the surface with it's abilities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    It provides an affordable way to protect your investment.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Claris
    It's almost what it should be after so may years and with Apple's longevity and strength behind it. For people who earn their living based on efficiency I think there are too many developer obstacles that waste time and therefore money.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Reliability and Availability
    Claris
    mostly never issues and if there are they are resolved fast
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Claris
    for the most part but lots of error messages if you type something h correctly
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Claris
    The forums are great with lots of helpful experts and the staff monitor them to provide help where needed. There have been a couple of unique technical issues I've had to deal with that I haven't been able to get resolved so I chose to score this a 9 instead of a 10.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    As I mentioned before, quality of support from Oracle Java SE Subscription is extraordinary. The speed of resolution and the expertise of the staff is really appreciated. We raised a high priority support incident which blocked our process [and] Oracle Java SE support did a quick analysis and provided a solution which took less time than we expected. They also help us in installing patches and updates whenever required.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Claris
    easy to follow along and was able to jump in right away
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Claris
    Suggest you use an iterative R.A.D. or AGILE development approach. (i.e. rather than writing a gigantic spec for a system, then building it). FileMaker facilitates quick prototypes. Developing an example, then allowing users to "try it out" is a snap.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Claris
    FileMaker is still the quickest way to go from zero to having a minimum viable working solution. Simple solutions can be built in as little as a afternoon of development. It is the only tool I am aware of which allows tech savy end users with domain knowledge to build bespoke apps for their businesses without undertaking professional software development training.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Build of OpenJDK stacks up against Oracle JDK (paid) very well. From both a performance, implementation, library support, and collaboration aspect.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    It is more suitable and effective to opt for Oracle Java SE Subscription to receive enhanced support for your Java SE Applications. The support team is highly qualified and technically sound to manage your Java SE Applications properly. Also they are available 24*7 to make sure applications are up-to-date.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Claris
    it's most definitely does as we are a unique business to use this for scholarship awarding
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Claris
    • We are a more agile company because of FileMaker. A few of us who are tech-savvy enough to manage the database (but are not professional developers) can make needed adjustments to our database without having to employ an in-house developer or contract with a 3rd party. As our business processes evolve and change, it's easy to update the database to accommodate those changes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • No cost alternative to paid JDK platforms
    • Performance is that of paid JDK platforms in my opinion
    • Community contribution is a bonus for contributed code and open collaboration
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Code portability allowed us to run the same code on all platforms
    • Security is always a key issue especially in the world of increasing cybersecurity laws. It only makes sense to invest in a secure development environment
    • Developers appreciate rich community support for java se platform
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots