Claris FileMaker vs. WompMobile

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Claris FileMaker
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Claris' FileMaker is presented as a Workplace Innovation Platform, and is used to create a custom app. Manual processes can be automated with Claris FileMaker Pro, and apps can be created to manage contacts, track inventory, organize projects, etc.
$21
per month per user
WompMobile
Score 9.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
WompMobile enables any website to be converted to a mobile-friendly format without the need to redesign or change the desktop site. It is a turn-key mobile development solution, meaning no IT involvement is required. This solution uses a proprietary JavaScript-adaptive platform. The vendor says their customers see an increase in mobile traffic and page performance, and an average conversion rate increase of 156%. This solution offers…N/A
Pricing
Claris FileMakerWompMobile
Editions & Modules
Platform Subscription
$21
per month per user
Individual desktop license
$594
one-time fee
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Claris FileMakerWompMobile
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional DetailsMobile website development consists of a one-time development fee and an ongoing monthly service fee. Prices vary depending on the size and scope of the project, website, technology, traffic and other factors.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Claris FileMakerWompMobile
Considered Both Products
Claris FileMaker
Chose Claris FileMaker
The Claris FileMaker "toolbox" is more robust and comprehensive than any competitive product. The free or low-cost web apps often lead to a "dead-end" that is never the case with Claris FileMaker.
Chose Claris FileMaker
Claris FileMaker looks more legit and not as likely to mess up formulas and such.
Chose Claris FileMaker
Access is very complex leading to longer deployment, more user training, and therefore higher costs. Caspio is decent but quite limited in its native ability.
Chose Claris FileMaker
I've used Microsoft Access, and it doesn't compare to Filemaker. The Filemaker software system is robust and had the ability to expand and work with other programs. I have a small business, and I can say that for a small to medium sized business, I do not think there is a …
Chose Claris FileMaker
Easy to get started and Includes starter solutions for every situation by Anyone with access can edit the program by using many plugins available to extend functionality such as Changing field/database/script names after the fact is free specially For the most part, drag and …
Chose Claris FileMaker
SmartSheets
Google Suite
Mendix
Chose Claris FileMaker
Claris just takes everything to the next level - there's nothing we've thrown at it that it can't do
Chose Claris FileMaker
FileMaker Pro is the chaotic, cumbersome and non-integratable little sibling of MS Access. And even MS Access can't be taken serious in a medium sized company. FileMaker Pro can not even be compared to serious products like OutSystems and Sitecore. It's also not free... whereas …
Chose Claris FileMaker
20 years ago we had to choose between Microsoft Access and Claris FileMaker Pro. We chose FileMaker Pro because it was easier to use. As our systems have evolved around FileMaker Pro we haven't looked at any competitors as we're too far along to start over again with a new …
Chose Claris FileMaker
The only other program I have used that has any type of similar functionality is ADP Workforce Now. I would prefer ADP Workforce Now overall because it is more user-friendly and can also accept tons of data, run reports, and more. However, FileMaker Pro has functionalities …
Chose Claris FileMaker
Quick Base is internet-based and easily programmable by the end-user. Because of that, it is not as customizable as FileMaker. We had very specific purposes that were more easily accomplished in FileMaker (eg. Auto-calculating fields were more fool proof-ly accomplished in …
Chose Claris FileMaker
We previously had deployed QuickBase. However, we realized that QuickBase would not allow us to construct our app the way we worked. That is where FMP came in. Its ability to adapt to the way we work made transitioning very easy.
Chose Claris FileMaker
I haven't used another product like FileMaker Pro. Previously (at other jobs), I would email my needs to our maintenance and catering staff.
Chose Claris FileMaker
We've been working with Filemaker Pro since I started here so I didn't have much a choice, but based on my past experience dealing with custom databases, it's the easiest, most user-friendly program I've ever worked on. It provides exactly what you need, when you need it, in …
Chose Claris FileMaker
Unlike traditional databases, you get an all inclusive solution which allows end-user screens and workflows which can be developed via scripting. With the exception of SQL Server, Filemaker also allows you to setup scheduled scripts which can run on a recurring basis. In …
Chose Claris FileMaker
Zoho Sales, CRM etc as well as Salesforce.
Chose Claris FileMaker
Since we had implemented FileMaker Pro early on with the company, I have not used any other database software on a regular basis. Some others have used Zoho Creator with success, but since the cross-platform and program functionality of FileMaker is well established we have …
Chose Claris FileMaker
I am now using WorkEtc for my CRM, and there are more benefits to me and my business using this software than using FileMaker Pro.
WORK Etc Benefits: CloudBase, App, Email Response Update Project Automatically, Invoicing, Reports, Tags, Some quick add features
Work Etc. Cons: …
Chose Claris FileMaker
I chose FileMaker over a custom DB with Azure and SQL Server because of the low code nature of FileMaker. And we needed ease of access with Apple products so we didn't use Microsoft Access.
Chose Claris FileMaker
Some developers really like Visual FoxPro - but it has been discontinued by Microsoft and is no longer supported.

FileMaker offers improved developer productivity.
Chose Claris FileMaker
We were already using FileMaker. When we get to the point of needing to scale or rebuild, we are likely to move to AWS but keep FileMaker for prototyping.
Chose Claris FileMaker
The most direct competitor to FileMaker Pro is Microsoft Access. If you understand the way Microsoft Access works, then you can probably get more functionality and features in Microsoft Access. With that said though, FileMaker is much easier to learn and develop in. I tried …
Chose Claris FileMaker
I find now that I can't use Excel. It drives me nuts. For me it is now just a method for importing data and a method for exporting data that Excel users want to see.
WompMobile
Chose WompMobile
We had interviewed a few other vendors who offered similar services. When it comes to integrating anything with an E-commerce platform there is always potential for major problems. When we asked each of the vendors the simple question of "Can you explain how your service works …
Chose WompMobile
We reached out to a number of different mobile site providers. Some responded, some didn't. WompMobile's CEO called me directly 5 minutes after I left a voicemail.

I viewed the other mobile site builders efforts as fairly generic looking and even in the selling pitch stage it …
Chose WompMobile
We have reviewed and met with two other products prior to WompMobile. In the end, we didn't do more a extensive RFP since the low investment cost prompted us to take a leap of faith. We also talked to WompMobile's reference customer, and they were extremely happy with …
Chose WompMobile
I have no basis of comparison. I stumbled upon WompMobile from a mention by This American Life (I think), and worked it out with them. Looked no further.
Chose WompMobile
When we started the process of finding a mobile solution, all of the products we saw were not very tolerant towards us and the industry. When we reached out to WompMobile, they walked us through everything and explained everything in great depth which was of great benefit to …
Chose WompMobile
The only similar alternative I found was Mobify, but they were extremely higher priced in all aspects.
Features
Claris FileMakerWompMobile
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
Claris FileMaker
8.0
Ratings
5% below category average
WompMobile
-
Ratings
Visual Modeling8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Drag-and-drop Interfaces4.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Security9.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform User Management7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Reusability8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Scalability9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Claris FileMakerWompMobile
Small Businesses
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.3 out of 10
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.3 out of 10
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Claris FileMakerWompMobile
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Claris FileMakerWompMobile
Likelihood to Recommend
I think FileMaker [Pro] is a great solution for a small business wanting to take the next step from managing data with Excel spreadsheets to actually using a database. It is very intuitive to use and manage. A tech-savvy user can learn to use FileMaker [Pro] very easily without advanced skills as a developer.
Read full review
Overall WompMobile is a great company, and it would be a great fit for 99% of companies out there. For us, we wish WompMobile had a POP in China to provide even faster page performance for CN users. To keep the cost down, a few enterprise anemities cited ealier will cause large enterprise to have reservations.
Read full review
Pros
  • The relational database management system makes the program highly customizable to fit the needs of any product. You can add a ton of information to each record and update your inventory on a regular basis with an Excel import or manually inside of the record. It has the capability to incorporate barcoding, which can manage your available inventory with ease.
  • The scripting language allows FileMaker to automatically calculate complex algorithms automatically or generate report outs with the click of a button. This allows for greater UI, especially with active users who are not familiar with writing code. Almost all of our internal data is linked to the FileMaker database
  • The server license allows many users to update the database in real time, which is handy if your inventory is constantly changing. We have users with Macs, PCs, iPhones and handheld tablets linked to our FileMaker database and they are updating the information constantly throughout the day.
  • If you invest some time into formatting and scripting the database, there is a high ease of use for users without knowledge of any programming or FileMaker itself.
Read full review
  • Delivery. On time delivery of design and updates.
  • Access. Whenever we have a question or need something communication is immediate.
  • Best practices. Our speed and SEO scores are outstanding. When Google changes algorithms our mobile site is already prepped for it.
  • Maintenance. If assets pulled from our main site create problems on mobile we are informed right away.
  • Improvements. WompMobile regularly investigates and offers improvements to functionality as the mobile space develops.
Read full review
Cons
  • I had some big complaints about how to edit calculations and scripts, and not being able to print/export PDF from server but with the last 2 versions I can't complain any more. Those got added.
  • Syncing records between iOS and Filemaker Server still requires a developer to accomplish. Although I make money doing it for others I wish there was some "central" method of syncing that everyone can follow.
Read full review
  • Honestly, we haven't experienced anything that would need improvement. As a company we are learning what we want and need to update and they have been there to support since day one.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It it not really up to me but my opinion does have some weight in the decision and the reason I would renew my use FileMaker Pro 8.5 is because I am finally getting used to it! Now that I have been working with the program, tasks have become quicker and projects are getting done faster. File Maker Pro 8.5 really is a versatile tool and I think we are just scratching the surface with it's abilities.
Read full review
Great solution and development team
Read full review
Usability
It's almost what it should be after so may years and with Apple's longevity and strength behind it. For people who earn their living based on efficiency I think there are too many developer obstacles that waste time and therefore money.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
mostly never issues and if there are they are resolved fast
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
for the most part but lots of error messages if you type something h correctly
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
The forums are great with lots of helpful experts and the staff monitor them to provide help where needed. There have been a couple of unique technical issues I've had to deal with that I haven't been able to get resolved so I chose to score this a 9 instead of a 10.
Read full review
Great development support
Read full review
In-Person Training
easy to follow along and was able to jump in right away
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Suggest you use an iterative R.A.D. or AGILE development approach. (i.e. rather than writing a gigantic spec for a system, then building it). FileMaker facilitates quick prototypes. Developing an example, then allowing users to "try it out" is a snap.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
FileMaker Pro is the chaotic, cumbersome and non-integratable little sibling of MS Access. And even MS Access can't be taken serious in a medium sized company. FileMaker Pro can not even be compared to serious products like OutSystems and Sitecore. It's also not free... whereas at least MS Access can be used free, even if your company is (really) small.
Read full review
We had interviewed a few other vendors who offered similar services. When it comes to integrating anything with an E-commerce platform there is always potential for major problems. When we asked each of the vendors the simple question of "Can you explain how your service works and integrates" many of the vendors could not answer this question from either a high level or a technical level which left us very concerned. WompMoble was able to explain their service so everyone on the team including some very seasoned developers felt comfortable moving forward vs. moving forward with another competitor
Read full review
Scalability
it's most definitely does as we are a unique business to use this for scholarship awarding
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Positive impact for my company is that we have designed a solution that meets the needs of our very custom processes.
  • My company is in the process of expanding rapidly and with that the need for new tools are need quickly. With most languages (like Java or .Net), it could take weeks to develop the same tool it takes us 3 days to make in Filemaker.
  • The most negative impact however is that at times Filemaker will just become overwhelmed and we have no choice but to restart the server which hosts the application.
Read full review
  • Our customer base is older, and we re not as reliant on a mobile site as some stores, but I did notice that our organic traffic rose in the wake of becoming mobile friendly. The Google penalty was noticeable, but now it is not there.
Read full review
ScreenShots

WompMobile Screenshots

Screenshot of Boys & Girls Club of America's website on mobile devices before and after implementing MobileOptimizeScreenshot of National Geographic's website on mobile devices before and after implementing MobileOptimizeScreenshot of Jones Soda's website on mobile devices before and after implementing MobileOptimize