Likelihood to Recommend As a true content management system it is great for site and content creation. It does need some help when it comes to adding functionality for using modern code systems that require server side scripting. For a marketing or public company site, it is an ideal CMS. For a SAAS type site, there could be many road blocks.
Read full review Progress Software Corporation
Progress Sitefinity remains a little heavyweight for sites that require basic text content, or a limited number of pages. However, its flexibility (including the range of different content types if supports) make it a good choice for any organization requiring advanced content management capabilities at an affordable price.
Read full review Pros Easy to get going for a business that has tons of content they need to manage. Clickability offers development and design services so you don't really even need IT. No need to worry about server uptime, storage, bandwidth, etc you have all the reports at your fingers for what you are using. Simple template and content design system, easy to expand and add. Powerful CMS and settings with a design and programming guide provided. AkAMAI and Limelight CDN's can be used for powerful and fast loading in many regions. Debugging tools to see how long specific templates and content load is exceptional. One can narrow down that this specific template ran X number of times and took this look and had to be stopped at X number of time due to exceeding set limits. Having a built in Dev, Staging, Production environments for testing makes seeing new features and how they will integrate into your site seamless. Read full review Progress Software Corporation
'Low-code structured content' (dynamic content types) is one of Sitefinity's most powerful features that allows you to structure content according to business needs, while at the same time dampening editorial freedom to ensure accessibility, meta enhancement, SEO and API consumption can be achieved. Sitefinity's content provider model allows us to flexibly (by means of admin interface) easily aggregate or separate content sharing within a multi-site instance. This proofs particularly powerful in emerging situations where there suddenly is a demand for content sharing across countries or regions. Adaptability at its core. While there's never a perfect fit for everything, it allows for easy code customization and extension being a .NET application at heart. Giving it a corporate edge over other custom solutions, whether it is on the development side or deployment side (on premise, IaaS or Azure DevOps Paas). And it has enabled us to put the system to use in its core feature - which is to manage content, where on other occasions we were able to take full advantage of its features such as A/B testing and personalization. Read full review Cons Choosing ad size/placement should be easier than it is. Now, I have to re-create the whole thing. When you "save" anything a pop-up comes up that is redundant. Ad list only shows a limited number. It's not until you click on one and cancel it out, then you can see all the listings. A bit tedious and redundant. Read full review Progress Software Corporation
Diagram or illustrate more use cases for server setups, and managing of upgrades. I'd like to see the ability to synchronize from one server to multiple others at once. Implementation assistance as part of the purchase rather than farming out to 3rd party, although they did answer every question we asked in order to determine our best architecture setup. Read full review Likelihood to Renew As mentioned in the last questions we are going to use a competitor brand next year. I think the issues are trying to find and fix problems from the previous programer. The steep learning curve and lack of mobile and social sharing capabilities. Things that I like are the strength of the programing which comes with a trade off. The ease for those who don't know markup to make updates to the website. Clickability isn't the easiest and can be difficult to find the content that you are interested in. We will not be using it next year.
Read full review Progress Software Corporation
Pricing makes this a no brainer. Not the best CMS, but with work arounds and some fumbling around we are able to make it do what we want it to do
Read full review Usability My experience with Clickability has been mostly positive but there are a few areas for improvement. It's generally easy to learn and use on a daily basis. I can move fast and do my job with speed with needed. But there is some clunky functionality with targeting and page building. My rating would be higher if some improvements were made.
Read full review Progress Software Corporation
Very big fan of this CMS, as it allows scalability, performance, and everything else. The support is great whenever we need it. As a marketer, the digital/marketing side of things is very easy to use and we've seen strong results from an SEO and marketing perspective. I can't speak to the developer/creative side too much, but in talking with these teams, they do recommend the tool as well.
Read full review Reliability and Availability Progress Software Corporation
Has been solid for us on availability
Read full review Performance Progress Software Corporation
A bit sluggish sometimes as the compiler works.
Read full review Support Rating I found that some agents were better then others, usually you have an account representative and that I would consider level 1 support. To get really complex answers you need to talk with an engineer.
Read full review Progress Software Corporation
Support can be pretty good, even though, depending on the level of licensing, it can take longer to hear back from their team. They do have a phone option, which works well. Overall, they are knowledgeable, and helpful when needed. At times, support is able to access the system directly and troubleshoot critical items when needed.
Read full review Implementation Rating Overall, it was pretty seemless to switch the sites over.
Read full review Progress Software Corporation
N/A - I was not part of the implementation team. We have had this internally for over 5 years. Based on my experience, ensure that you have documentation on the initial implementation and subsequent upgrades. I would also recommend to have all the documentation on how and why the system was implemented the way it was
Read full review Alternatives Considered Many of other content management systems similar to WordPress need custom installation. The server costs and upgrades quickly add up. Clickability while expensive, eliminated the overhead of managing all the dependency needs for a CMS. Clickability also works with its clients to understand the business needs and proposes the solutions accordingly. They have a good support team.
Read full review Progress Software Corporation
It is hands down just easier for our customers to use. The interface and the page builder experience is much better than what we have used in the past and has many enterprise features even in the lower price-point
Read full review Scalability Progress Software Corporation
Seems pretty scalable.
Read full review Return on Investment I know a big positive is the fact that it is always-on. We are the leading news corporation for our state, and in many markets, nationwide. We pride ourselves on our strong ethics in the community and thus need to exude reliability to maintain the trust of these communities. Having a website fail periodically erodes that reliable perception. It has allowed different areas of the company to approach our team and work in a cohesive manner. Dave Sell Manager, Interactive Development / Software+Web+Cloud Engineer
Read full review Progress Software Corporation
Sitefinity has reduced the amount of time it takes to edit and publish content, which has enabled us to get information out more quickly. Sitefinity allowed us to establish a consistent and modern brand identity and apply it across multiple websites. Read full review ScreenShots Progress Sitefinity Screenshots