Clio Draft vs. Google Forms
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Clio Draft | Score10 out of 10 | N/A | Clio Draft (formerly Lawyaw) is a legal document automation solution, offering access to cloud-based fillable court forms, and the ability to turn Microsoft Word documents into fillable templates. | $70 per month per user |
Google Forms | Score8.4 out of 10 | N/A | Google Forms is an app for creating forms and surveys, and is part of Google Apps for Work. The product focuses on ease of use; the interface is similar to a document editor, with drop down lists of options and drag and drop question re-ordering. Users can embed images and video into surveys. Users can also program the question flow with custom logic. Google sends users basic summaries of the survey results automatically, or users can export the raw survey results data and analyze it via… | N/A |
| Clio Draft | Google Forms | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | $30/mo for each additional user. Discounted annual pricing is available. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Clio Draft | Google Forms | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 98% Would buy again 64 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 65 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Happy with the feature set 60 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 42 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Implementation went as expected 48 Answers | |
| Clio Draft | Google Forms | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Survey Format & Appearance |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Survey Content |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Survey Logic |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Survey Reporting & Analytics |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Survey Administration & Security |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Survey Distribution |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Clio Draft | Google Forms | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Jotform Score8.5 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic | ![]() Qualaroo Score7 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | QuestionPro Score9.2 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Clio Draft | Google Forms | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 | 9.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 7.0 |
| Usability | - | 8.6 |
| Availability | - | 10.0 |
| Performance | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 9.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.0 |
| Configurability | - | 4.0 |
| Ease of integration | - | 7.0 |
| Product Scalability | - | 9.0 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 10.0 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 10.0 |
| Clio Draft | Google Forms | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | Incentivized |
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Clio Draft Screenshots |









