Codacy vs. ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Codacy | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request reporting back the impact of every commit or pull request, issues concerning code style, best practices, security, and many others. It monitors changes in code coverage, code duplication and code complexity. Saving developers time in code reviews thus efficiently tackling technical debt. JavaScript, Java, Ruby, Scala, PHP, Python, CoffeeScript and CSS are currently supported. Codacy is static analysis… | $0 |
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes | Score9.5 out of 10 | N/A | ThreatDown (formerly Malwarebytes for Business), combines Malwarebytes' endpoint security capabilities in four bundles. The basic Core tier includes incident response, Next-gen AV, device control, vulnerability assessments, and the ability to block unwanted application. | $345 per year 5 endpoints (minimum) |
| Codacy | ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Optional Add-Ons include server and mobile device protection. Server protection ranges from $129 to $179 per annum depending on service tier. Mobile security is $10 per device, no matter the service tier. A 10% discount is offered for choosing a two-year billing plan. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Codacy | ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 5 Answers | 93% Would buy again 13 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 5 Answers | 93% Delivers good value for the price 13 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | 86% Happy with the feature set 12 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 12 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 13 Answers | |
| Codacy | ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Security |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Codacy | ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Beyond Compare Score9.3 out of 10 | SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Beyond Compare Score9.3 out of 10 | ![]() BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Beyond Compare Score9.3 out of 10 | ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Codacy | ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.2 | 8.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 10.0 |
| Usability | - | 10.0 |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 10.0 |
| Codacy | ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Codacy Screenshots |











