Overall Satisfaction with Malwarebytes Endpoint Protection
We use Malwarebytes Endpoint Protection on end user machines that are used by users who have broader permissions in business applications and also used by users who are more susceptible to clicking on malicious links, malicious attachments, etc. We only use it on a select number of end user machines.
- Ease of administration
- Visibility
- Ease of implementation
- Detection and removal of threats
- Malwarebytes blocks access to malicious URL's, but the access isn't always user generated. It would be nice if Malwarebytes could help identify the source better.
- Once in a great while, an endpoint that uses Malwarebytes disconnects from the Nebula console. This has only happened twice in the last 4 years, but it is inconvenient and not realized until a manual audit is done.
- It would be nice if Malwarebytes would integrate with our RMM solution.
- Detection and removal of threats
- Ease of administration
- Ease of implementation
- Visibility
- Customization of policies on endpoints
- Solution works on Windows and MacOS
- I believe it has a positive impact. I do not have ROI numbers, but Malwarebytes has provided better protection over our other antimalware solution, which means less labor time has been needed to address the infections that were occurring.
- Also, Malwarebytes has detected and stopped more attempts to reach malicious URL's than our other solution, which we did not know was happening before.
- Webroot Antivirus + Internet Security Complete (SecureAnywhere)
I think Malwarebytes Endpoint Protection is hands down better from any point of view other than price. Malwarebytes is a little bit more costly than Webroot. However, Malwarebytes detects more threats, protects against more malicious URL's, allows more in customization of policies, has better administration GUI, and has better means of implementation.
Do you think ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes's feature set?
Yes
Did ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes again?
Yes
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes Feature Ratings
Using Malwarebytes Endpoint Protection
17 - These people represent many departments, which include IT, facilities service management, student services, faculty, HR, financial aid, online program management, student development, and sales. We primarily use Malwarebytes on end user machines where we believe the end users are more susceptible or gullible on malicious emails, malicious attachments, etc. and where we know certain end users have more access to business data compared to other employees.
1 - Given the ease of administration and implementation, a person with average tech skill can get Malwarebytes Endpoint Protection rolled out and deployed in a production environment. It is really easy to use and customize policies. A person with higher cybersecurity skill would be needed if big breach occurred, such as a large outbreak of ransomware.
- Need for more security
- Added protection for susceptible end users
- Ease of administration
- Ease of implementation
- Malwarebytes has recently added some modules that can be added on, such as patch management for Windows machines and vulnerability assessments. We are considering adding on these modules.