codeBeamer ALM vs. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

codeBeamer ALM

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
codeBeamer ALM	Score 6.6 out of 10	N/A	Intland Software's codeBeamer ALM is a scalable Agile Application Lifecycle Management platform that focuses on traceability and compliance. codeBeamer ALM supports both Agile and Waterfall, and offers a scalable solution for both small and large organisations to develop better products faster. The vendor says their customers think about the benefits of codeBeamer ALM in terms of higher efficiency and effectiveness along the lifecycle, with the goal of cutting development time and…	N/A
Forcepoint DLP	Score 8.2 out of 10	N/A	Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) protects sensitive data everywhere it resides and moves, across endpoints, cloud apps, web, email, and on-premises environments. It delivers unified policy management and centralized control from a single console.	N/A

Pricing

codeBeamer ALM

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
codeBeamer ALM	Forcepoint DLP
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

Optional

No setup fee

Additional Details

Perpetual and rented licenses available. Named users & floating license types can be combined.

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	codeBeamer ALM	Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
Considered Both Products	codeBeamer ALM Robert Jurjevic Software Engineer Chose codeBeamer ALM codeBeamer is by far better. Incentivized Helpful?	Forcepoint DLP Verified User Anonymous Chose Forcepoint DLP Nobody can compete with Forcepoint DLP. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Forcepoint DLP I think Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention pales in comparison to the feature set you get with M365 (which is likely included in most corporations existing licensing!). We moved on from Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention to implement Microsoft's solution instead. Incentivized Helpful? Piyush Mittal Senior Manager Chose Forcepoint DLP Zscaler Internet Access Incentivized Helpful? Olivia Jayy Operations Manager Chose Forcepoint DLP User friendly solution that makes it easy to deploy and manage. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention very effective to protecting our valuable data on endpoints and where data lives like in the Cloud, server and on-premises disk drives and its valuable to just set policies once and … Incentivized Helpful? DS Darshil Sanghvi Presales Chose Forcepoint DLP We tested and evaluated Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and this solution suited the best for our requirement. We optimized it to suit our requirement of 250 to 300 users in our head office. We will be adding a few more users under this solution which are having Windows and MAC … Incentivized Helpful? Brandon Smith Business Consultant Chose Forcepoint DLP I find Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention to be a superior product compared to the other two alternatives mentioned. It is improving, though, at a slower pace but I have seen it upgrading to its best level. There is more value associated with this tool than the other two. … Incentivized Helpful? Tribett Requena Gerente de Proyectos Chose Forcepoint DLP Because it allows the creation of reports and statistics, risk assessment, real-time monitoring, fingerprints, machine learning, [and] a dictionary function--so good and useful. Incentivized Helpful? Bhuwan Chandra Business Development Manager Chose Forcepoint DLP I have evaluated CoSoSys but the reporting part did not hit the mark. Also, a high number of false positives was a concern for me. I need a predefined report which needs to be compatible with my compliance requirement, which was missing in CoSoSys. However CoSoSys is good for … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Forcepoint DLP We have not done a ton of testing with alternatives at this point. Incentivized Helpful? HL Henry Luk Senior Information Security Analyst Chose Forcepoint DLP The products listed are currently being evaluated. Incentivized Helpful? John Keenan Director of Information Security Chose Forcepoint DLP Netskope, Digital Guardian. We've stuck with Forcepoint to limit the number of major architectural changes in a given year. If we achieved diminishing marginal returns on its ROI, then we'd change because the prevention is good, but the headache has to be less than the … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Forcepoint DLP We have tried out Office 365 and Trend Micro DLP but those solutions have not worked out as we hoped. That said, when we looked at Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, there were only minor issues we came across that did not have any negative impact and overall, the solution was … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Forcepoint DLP Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but Proofpoint has proven to be a superior product. In our experience Proofpoint has fewer false positives and more out-of-the-box pattern detections requiring less customization. However, there is still a value in having more than one DLP … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Forcepoint DLP Haven't used other product. Incentivized Helpful? Ted Jan VP Technical Services Chose Forcepoint DLP We didn't evaluate any other solutions at the time of purchase. Forcepoint was the leader on the Gartner report and we went with their recommendation. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Forcepoint DLP We selected Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention because it meets the size of our organization's needs and the ease of implementation compared to other solutions. Incentivized Helpful? MH Mark Horste Director Information Services Chose Forcepoint DLP We selected Forcepoint DLP as we already were using their Web and Email filtering products. The integration among their products is very strong and we did not want to introduce too many additional products into our environment. We have limited security resources so a high level … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Forcepoint DLP Easier to user and cheaper Incentivized Helpful? PC Philip Clerico Network Security Engineer Chose Forcepoint DLP It is a lot easier to use than Symantec. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Forcepoint DLP We are currently in the evaluation phase to compare overall cost and functionality. Blue Coat runs in a very similar way that Forcepoint does. Check Point runs at the same gateway layer that the firewall does so its policy can be run on the same hardware of existing environments. Incentivized Helpful? David Stanfield Systems/Network Administrator Chose Forcepoint DLP Forcepoint stacks up pretty well against its competitors. It has more functionality then Cisco and is comparable to McAfee. McAfee is one of the few I would feel at ease with replacing our currently solution with. Incentivized Helpful? Alan Matson, CCNA:S, MCP Senior Network Security Engineer Chose Forcepoint DLP Overall it was the best we had, SSL decryption worked better than Bluecoat and Cisco traffic had a lot of certificate issues. Websense was the quickest to get up and running and their sales engineering team is superb. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Forcepoint DLP Websense has similar features to other DLP solutions. We selected Websense based upon other organizations' experiences. I cannot compare the negatives to Websense as we did not deploy any other vendor DLP solutions in the same scale. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Forcepoint DLP Websense, at the time, was the only content filtering solution to offer a hybrid option of on-prem and cloud services. We are up for renewal soon and will likely compare them to other vendors. Incentivized Helpful? Bill Rieger Network Engineer Chose Forcepoint DLP Websense gave us the best flexibility for our enterprise configuration and setup. It all does not take up anything on our computers when we use Websense one armed off our firewalls and routers. We found this very easy to set up and transparent to our users and network. The … Incentivized Helpful?

Features

codeBeamer ALM

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Data Preparation

Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
	codeBeamer ALM - Ratings	Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention 5.8 Ratings 31% below category average
Data Encryption	00 Ratings	5.80 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	codeBeamer ALM	Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
Small Businesses	Polarion ALM Score 9.9 out of 10	Paubox Email Suite Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Polarion ALM Score 9.9 out of 10	Druva Security Cloud Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises	Polarion ALM Score 9.9 out of 10	Druva Security Cloud Score 9.4 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	codeBeamer ALM	Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
Likelihood to Recommend	9.1 (0 ratings)	7.1 (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	- (0 ratings)	7.6 (0 ratings)
Usability	6.4 (0 ratings)	7.1 (0 ratings)
Support Rating	9.1 (0 ratings)	5.3 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	codeBeamer ALM	Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
Likelihood to Recommend	In my opinion codeBeamer is well suited for any activity where detailed tracking is needed with teams involved. It can be less suited for small projects which do not last long, or are not continuous, etc Robert Jurjevic Software Engineer Read full review	-Where companies need to secure their attachment, which goes outside, means from their company to outside -Where companies need to ensure their client's personal information -Where companies need DLP. They need to look for Forcepoint only, as they have the upper hand over the rest of their competitors. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Tracing of requirements. Tracking of development. Tracking of QA. Tracking of bugs. Tracking of releases. Wiki. Users and teams. Works for teams scattered across the globe. Testing and coverage for releases. Integration with SVN. Robert Jurjevic Software Engineer Read full review	The Forcepoint Endpoint Data Loss Prevention Endpoint module is applied to secure data being used at endpoints, like from Microsoft Excel and other Microsoft capabilities, also other functions like email and FTP, Active Sync, etc. It secures the data in use at the endpoint. The Forcepoint Endpoint Data Loss Prevention Network Module is applied for the traffic being used in network capabilities like email, FTP, and web. It also secures the data on the move in the network. Forcepoint Data Discover--the capability to discover the data which is sensitive for the organization and lies across the network; with the discovery tool, we can define the data, which is important based on regulatory and compliance risk. OCR (optical character recognition) capabilities also come with the Data Discover Module, by which we can see the embedded text inside the image and that helps to prevent sensitive data theft. Incentivized Bhuwan Chandra Business Development Manager Read full review
Cons	Search. Metric calculation. Would be nice that cB is a source of truth, i.e., that say SVN commit is done only from cB; know this is difficult to achieve. Robert Jurjevic Software Engineer Read full review	Remote filtering is not as advanced as we would like. Support time is not as quick as needed in most cases. Upgrades of appliances and software is not as easy as other solutions. HTTPS inspection needs to hand a valid cert and doesnt work correctly with all vendors. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	No answers on this topic	We have been fairly happy with the product and how it has worked. We have looked at other vendors for url filter and such and have not found one that meets our needs or does what we have been doing with Websense. The product has been fairly stable and we have only had a few issues in the past. We have all seen that it was one of the highest leaders from the Gartner Group Magic Quadrant for Web Gateways. Incentivized Bill Rieger Network Engineer Read full review
Usability	Sometimes info in codeBeamer can be lost, in principle, if not well organized by the user, info can never be found, or can be forgotten about, etc Robert Jurjevic Software Engineer Read full review	For us, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention was difficult to administer, did not work well when it did work, was incredibly expensive for the feature set you get, and was difficult to uninstall when we moved on from the software. Once it was fully set up, it worked occasionally for us. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Support Rating	Excellent support professionally. Also, thanks for giving me for free access to SaaS cB for my hobbyist project. Robert Jurjevic Software Engineer Read full review	Support from Forcepoint has been lacking. When calling in with a high priority issue we rarely are able to work with a technician immediately. The queue waits are very long and when you get through there are no support engineers available and we need to wait for a call back for hours it seems. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	codeBeamer is by far better. Robert Jurjevic Software Engineer Read full review	User friendly solution that makes it easy to deploy and manage. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention very effective to protecting our valuable data on endpoints and where data lives like in the Cloud, server and on-premises disk drives and its valuable to just set policies once and start utilizing Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention solution. Incentivized Olivia Jayy Operations Manager Read full review
Return on Investment	Customer tracking. Process tracking. Workflow framework. Can be overhead. Robert Jurjevic Software Engineer Read full review	The capability of this tool to update in real time has saved a lot of time and even saved a lot of energy for researching. The exchange of financial information related to customers builds up an extreme risk of data loss, which can be damaging to the customer. Incentivized Brandon Smith Business Consultant Read full review
ScreenShots	codeBeamer ALM Screenshots