codeBeamer ALM vs. Mitratech PolicyHub

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
codeBeamer ALM
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Intland Software's codeBeamer ALM is a scalable Agile Application Lifecycle Management platform that focuses on traceability and compliance. codeBeamer ALM supports both Agile and Waterfall, and offers a scalable solution for both small and large organisations to develop better products faster. The vendor says their customers think about the benefits of codeBeamer ALM in terms of higher efficiency and effectiveness along the lifecycle, with the goal of cutting development time and…N/A
Mitratech PolicyHub
Score 5.8 out of 10
N/A
Mitratech PolicyHub is a policy management solution designed to create, update, approve and communicate policies to automated knowledge assessments, audit and reporting.N/A
Pricing
codeBeamer ALMMitratech PolicyHub
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
codeBeamer ALMMitratech PolicyHub
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPerpetual and rented licenses available. Named users & floating license types can be combined.—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
codeBeamer ALMMitratech PolicyHub
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons
Best Alternatives
codeBeamer ALMMitratech PolicyHub
Small Businesses
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.3 out of 10
PowerDMS by NEOGOV
PowerDMS by NEOGOV
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.3 out of 10
PowerDMS by NEOGOV
PowerDMS by NEOGOV
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.3 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
codeBeamer ALMMitratech PolicyHub
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(1 ratings)
5.6
(5 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
6.2
(5 ratings)
Usability
6.4
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.1
(4 ratings)
User Testimonials
codeBeamer ALMMitratech PolicyHub
Likelihood to Recommend
Intland Software
In my opinion codeBeamer is well suited for any activity where detailed tracking is needed with teams involved. It can be less suited for small projects which do not last long, or are not continuous, etc
Read full review
Mitratech
If you need a centralized location for policies and procedures, this system is great for the cost and effectiveness. While other systems had more bells and whistles, PolicyHub had everything one needs to maintain their P&Ps without costing a small fortune.
Read full review
Pros
Intland Software
  • Tracing of requirements.
  • Tracking of development.
  • Tracking of QA.
  • Tracking of bugs.
  • Tracking of releases.
  • Wiki.
  • Users and teams.
  • Works for teams scattered across the globe.
  • Testing and coverage for releases.
  • Integration with SVN.
Read full review
Mitratech
  • Reminders of policies needing updating
  • Simple inbox for end-user
  • Online Access
Read full review
Cons
Intland Software
  • Search.
  • Metric calculation.
  • Would be nice that cB is a source of truth, i.e., that say SVN commit is done only from cB; know this is difficult to achieve.
Read full review
Mitratech
  • Document retraction can be confusing. Document in the library will still show as published even though it has been retracted.
  • Reporting is lacking in some areas. We have had issues meeting compliance requirements for document review status dates.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Intland Software
No answers on this topic
Mitratech
It helps us do what we need it to do.
Read full review
Usability
Intland Software
Sometimes info in codeBeamer can be lost, in principle, if not well organized by the user, info can never be found, or can be forgotten about, etc
Read full review
Mitratech
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Intland Software
Excellent support professionally. Also, thanks for giving me for free access to SaaS cB for my hobbyist project.
Read full review
Mitratech
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Intland Software
No answers on this topic
Mitratech
There were a number of calls and fixes that had to take place. we have a number of patches in places and bugs that needed fixing. we identified issues as we went along and became the company trying to test the system with no real benefit to us.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Intland Software
codeBeamer is by far better.
Read full review
Mitratech
We did not evaluate any other product.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Intland Software
  • Customer tracking.
  • Process tracking.
  • Workflow framework.
  • Can be overhead.
Read full review
Mitratech
  • It has enabled us to maintain a central database of P&P to ensure everyone is on the same page. We were completely paper/manual before so some things didn't get updated appropriately. This enables us to review and comply with requirements we have as a federally-qualified health center. It also makes it easier for us to pull policies when we need them.
Read full review
ScreenShots

codeBeamer ALM Screenshots

Screenshot of Baselined tracker management with suspected linksScreenshot of Versioned test management for automated and manual testing (with parametrized test cases)Screenshot of Easily exportable & automated dashboards and reports for management and audit supportScreenshot of Gapless traceability throughout the development lifecycle