TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    CodeIgniter

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/ACodeIgniter is a free and open source PHP framework, developed originally by EllisLab.N/A

    Contentful

    Score7.6 out of 10
    N/AContentful is a cloud based CMS solution that provides the ability to manage content across multiple platforms.The editing interface allows for managing content interactively and provides developers the ability to deliver the content with the programming language and template framework of their choice.

    $0

    Pricing
    CodeIgniterContentful
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Lite
    $300
    per month
    Community
    Free
    Enterprise
    Custom
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CodeIgniterContentful
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    CodeIgniterContentful
    Considered Both Products
    Open Source
    No answer on this topic
    Contentful
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    7 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    7 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    6 Answers
    Features
    CodeIgniterContentful
    Security
    Comparison of Security features of CodeIgniter and Contentful
    Feature
    CodeIgniter
    -
    Ratings
    Contentful
    8.5
    10 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Role-based user permissions00 Ratings8.510 Ratings
    Platform & Infrastructure
    Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of CodeIgniter and Contentful
    Feature
    CodeIgniter
    -
    Ratings
    Contentful
    9.5
    12 Ratings
    20% above category average
    API00 Ratings9.311 Ratings
    Internationalization / multi-language00 Ratings9.79 Ratings
    Web Content Creation
    Comparison of Web Content Creation features of CodeIgniter and Contentful
    Feature
    CodeIgniter
    -
    Ratings
    Contentful
    7.8
    13 Ratings
    1% below category average
    WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings7.34 Ratings
    Code quality / cleanliness00 Ratings9.58 Ratings
    Admin section00 Ratings9.311 Ratings
    Page templates00 Ratings7.64 Ratings
    Library of website themes00 Ratings7.52 Ratings
    Mobile optimization / responsive design00 Ratings4.57 Ratings
    Publishing workflow00 Ratings9.312 Ratings
    Form generator00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Web Content Management
    Comparison of Web Content Management features of CodeIgniter and Contentful
    Feature
    CodeIgniter
    -
    Ratings
    Contentful
    9.4
    12 Ratings
    22% above category average
    Content taxonomy00 Ratings10.011 Ratings
    SEO support00 Ratings10.09 Ratings
    Bulk management00 Ratings9.08 Ratings
    Availability / breadth of extensions00 Ratings9.08 Ratings
    Community / comment management00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    CodeIgniterContentful
    Small Businesses
    Laravel PHP Framework
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Umbraco CMS
    Score7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Laravel PHP Framework
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Square Online
    Score7.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    RWS Tridion Sites
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    CodeIgniterContentful
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (14 ratings)
    8.3
    (13 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CodeIgniterContentful
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Open Source
    The input class makes it easy to provide server-side validation and scrubbing of user input. Setting Error messages. It doesn't require constant command-line access, It's great because it has a strong community and excellent documentation, but the problem is that it tries to retain backward compatibility with PHP 4 and therefore lacks a lot of "standard" features modern frameworks have such as auto-loading.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contentful
    It's a great all rounder for content projects. It's easy in the basics and powerful in the complex, data heavy scenarios. Extending the platform is straightforward and the SDK gives you everything you need. If you have many many varying content types , it gets expensive and perhaps not the best choice .
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Open Source
    • CodeIgniter is an excellent tool when a simple database API is needed. Postgres, MySQL, and SQLite are all abstracted into a simple-to-use
    • CodeIgniter's simplicity is truly its best feature, because you are able to create controllers and methods based on the http://www.example//, and immediately being developing the application.
    • Flexibility is also another developer-friendly feature, because developers are able to design their application in any way - controllers, models, libraries, and helpers can be located anywhere or not used at all.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contentful
    • Flexible. This CMS can be easily extended and provide access to dynamic content
    • Simple. The WYSWG is very easy to work with and identifying pages and content in the system is fairly easy
    • Clean Interface. The interface is clean and uncluttered keeping focus on the content and not other factors.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Open Source
    • Faced some issue of session management, so that's why we used the Core Session library for that. It would be great if we could improve it a little bit.
    • Frameworks provide the option to setup all getters/setters, so having this option in it is a great idea.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contentful
    • Contentful uses "references" to allow you to build very modular content. If I have a "slider" content type, I can create a "slide" content type which references a "button" content type, and so forth. This works well, but I occasionally wish there was a better solution for one-off content, like a settings page. Currently, this is done for creating an entire content type called "settings" with a single entry. Not a big deal, but not ideal, either.
    • There are a few quirks with GatsbyJS integration, etc, but these issues are being fixed and improved upon very quickly.
    • A minor gripe, but Contentful does not have a way to organize fields within an entry. Entries with many fields are somewhat tiresome to scroll through.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Contentful
    It is a very easy to use and configure application. I find that it is on the user to manage the content after the models have been created, yet I still do not encounter issues finding or creating new components for our site. It is easy to set up and easy to navigate.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Open Source
    CodeIgniter has a very small footprint. The source code is very small sized. Setting up a project is very easy. Follows MVC pattern. Consumes low memory and CPU. Well documented. Has a built-in forum for users to discuss and get the solution for issues. Periodically updates versions and patch fixes etc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contentful
    Easy to use and much more organized as a single platform versus multi. The layout is clean and easy to read and we don’t have to worry about certain users safe guarding data or content then losing it when they leave the company. It’s a one stop shop for imagery
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Open Source
    • Because of quick turnaround on portals/intranets, it was easy to offer this as an option to clients.
    • As there is no cost associated with this framework, it was great not having to worry about purchasing or licensing. (MIT License).
    • Community support helps in that there are no ongoing support contracts or costs.
    • No direct representative for one-on-one support, if needed. This can cut into time used on projects.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contentful
    • Contentful has saved us valuable development time that was previously spent doing deploys for minor content updates.
    • Contentful has helped us maintain consistent documentation, reducing time needed to review for consistency.
    • Can't say we've really experienced any negative ROI impacts from using Contentful, but we've run into some limitations in adding too many content models and the next pricing tier is substantially more expensive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Contentful Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot