CoderPad vs. Criteria

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CoderPad
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
CoderPad is a technical interview platform from the company of the same name in San Francisco, ideally used by development teams to enable a quick, accurate read on a candidate's skills through the hiring process. According to the vendor, CoderPad works like an IDE to help candidates share their skills and ensure the interviewer understands how the candidate works. The platform supports collaborative coding sessions and take-home assignments.
$50
per month
Criteria
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
Criteria is an assessment company dedicated to helping organizations make better talent decisions using objective, multidimensional data. By combining data science with validation backed by I/O psychologists, they aim to provide precise assessments. Their assessments cover aptitude, personality, emotional intelligence, and skills to provide the most robust picture of talent. Since launching in 2006, the vendor states their assessments have been administered more than 25 million times through our…N/A
Pricing
CoderPadCriteria
Editions & Modules
Personal
$50
per month (5 interviews)
Team
$250
per month (30 interviews)
Business
$750
per month (90 interviews)
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CoderPadCriteria
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details$15/interview for overages
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CoderPadCriteria
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons
Best Alternatives
CoderPadCriteria
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Renaissance Star Assessments
Renaissance Star Assessments
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

Renaissance Star Assessments
Renaissance Star Assessments
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

WileyPLUS
WileyPLUS
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CoderPadCriteria
Likelihood to Recommend
7.8
(3 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CoderPadCriteria
Likelihood to Recommend
CoderPad
- To conduct a preliminary assessment round when there are multiple candidates to choose from. Helps you to filter out candidates on the basis of requirements. - The questions that are assigned for each test are different, so the probability of any two candidates getting the exact same questions is very less. -However, the questions are based on the same concepts so as to provide an equal ground to all the candidates.- However, if you have to choose from less number of candidates you are better off conducting normal interviews, as these tests are time-consuming for both interviewers and employers.
Read full review
Criteria Corp.
Best for small to mid-sized companies where you do not have a robust applicant tracking system. It served a dual purpose for my company and made my job easier. If you are large, the applicant tracking system is not beneficial to you while the assessments might be. If it can integrate directly with your system, use it!
Read full review
Pros
CoderPad
  • Large range of supported languages
  • Code runs quickly
  • Allows for intractability between interviewer and interviewee
Read full review
Criteria Corp.
  • Customer Support
  • Training
  • Easy to use interface
  • Ability to customize
Read full review
Cons
CoderPad
  • Code editor should be more responsive for auto suggestions
  • Practice environment should be located in such a way that it should be found easily
  • A transparent and publicly available pricing
Read full review
Criteria Corp.
  • Integration with more HRIS platforms
  • More job descriptions for professional roles
  • Computer based testing that is more specialized
Read full review
Usability
CoderPad
CoderPad is incredibly easy to use, not much to note.
Read full review
Criteria Corp.
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
CoderPad
We did use other option other than CoderPad. Before CoderPad we were using references for hiring but then again the whole process of assessment was not easy. It takes time. CoderPad came to our lives through a reference and since then it has somewhat changed the way we see hiring.
Read full review
Criteria Corp.
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
CoderPad
  • 10 working hours saved weekly which used to be spent on interviews
  • Approximately 3 employees worth of manpower is saved
  • The benefit of allowing assessment in multiple languages allowed the interviewee to concentrate on evaluation on the basis of underlying concepts
Read full review
Criteria Corp.
  • Efficiency for a one person HR team
  • Better recruiting practices
  • Higher retention
Read full review
ScreenShots