CoderPad vs. EYardstick

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CoderPad
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
CoderPad is a technical interview platform from the company of the same name in San Francisco, ideally used by development teams to enable a quick, accurate read on a candidate's skills through the hiring process. According to the vendor, CoderPad works like an IDE to help candidates share their skills and ensure the interviewer understands how the candidate works. The platform supports collaborative coding sessions and take-home assignments.
$50
per month
EYardstick
Score 9.8 out of 10
N/A
EYardstick’s Pre-Employment Tests Enable Hiring Teams With Detailed Insights On Candidate’s Knowledge, Skill And Disposition Measured By Online Video Interviews To Take A Justified Decision In Screening Out Misfits, Saving A Lot Of Time And Effort. Be it Coding, Sales Aptitude, Customer Support, Entry Level or any other Role; EYardstick evaluates the skill for almost any role.N/A
Pricing
CoderPadEYardstick
Editions & Modules
Personal
$50
per month (5 interviews)
Team
$250
per month (30 interviews)
Business
$750
per month (90 interviews)
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CoderPadEYardstick
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee$100
Additional Details$15/interview for overages
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CoderPadEYardstick
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons
Best Alternatives
CoderPadEYardstick
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Renaissance Star Assessments
Renaissance Star Assessments
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

WileyPLUS
WileyPLUS
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

WileyPLUS
WileyPLUS
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CoderPadEYardstick
Likelihood to Recommend
7.8
(3 ratings)
9.8
(5 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.8
(5 ratings)
User Testimonials
CoderPadEYardstick
Likelihood to Recommend
CoderPad
- To conduct a preliminary assessment round when there are multiple candidates to choose from. Helps you to filter out candidates on the basis of requirements. - The questions that are assigned for each test are different, so the probability of any two candidates getting the exact same questions is very less. -However, the questions are based on the same concepts so as to provide an equal ground to all the candidates.- However, if you have to choose from less number of candidates you are better off conducting normal interviews, as these tests are time-consuming for both interviewers and employers.
Read full review
EYardstick
EYardstick is a neat tool. It's not complicated to use and if your requirement is to do a pre-employment assessment for a wide variety of roles with minimal support then this is the right one for your team.
Read full review
Pros
CoderPad
  • Large range of supported languages
  • Code runs quickly
  • Allows for intractability between interviewer and interviewee
Read full review
EYardstick
  • It's very easy to learn and use.
  • Very helpful with selecting the right individual for the position needed.
  • Ready-to-use test saves lots of time.
Read full review
Cons
CoderPad
  • Code editor should be more responsive for auto suggestions
  • Practice environment should be located in such a way that it should be found easily
  • A transparent and publicly available pricing
Read full review
EYardstick
  • Wish to have AI-based shortlisting feature.
  • Analytics can be more advanced.
  • Though tool has a lot of reports but to derive the value out of it is time consuming. Hope they improve in this aspect.
Read full review
Usability
CoderPad
CoderPad is incredibly easy to use, not much to note.
Read full review
EYardstick
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
CoderPad
No answers on this topic
EYardstick
There are many ways to reach the support team, and they went beyond their routine to support us in both adding technical features and content for tests.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
CoderPad
We did use other option other than CoderPad. Before CoderPad we were using references for hiring but then again the whole process of assessment was not easy. It takes time. CoderPad came to our lives through a reference and since then it has somewhat changed the way we see hiring.
Read full review
EYardstick
HirePro was more service oriented than product oriented. EYardstick had a lot of self help and very easy for a novice to pick and start using it. Most of the features are self explanatory. Also our demand was to cater to a wide variety of job roles. EYardstick helped us in assessments for BPO hiring to typing tests to core IT exams with 360 degree proctoring solution.
Read full review
Return on Investment
CoderPad
  • 10 working hours saved weekly which used to be spent on interviews
  • Approximately 3 employees worth of manpower is saved
  • The benefit of allowing assessment in multiple languages allowed the interviewee to concentrate on evaluation on the basis of underlying concepts
Read full review
EYardstick
  • Saved man-hours spent in interviews.
  • Saved time in coordination and scheduling of telephonic interviews.
  • Employment Pre-Assessment tests cost approximately $3 per test.
Read full review
ScreenShots

EYardstick Screenshots

Screenshot of Video Interviews
Video interviews are much faster than traditional telephonic interviews in which; up to 80% of the candidates get rejected. EYardstick does the job of finding the right fit for you so you can only talk to the right candidates in subsequent interview rounds.
1. Know your candidate before he knows you
2. Spend more time with the right candidate – No more wasted phone interviews
3. Create an Engaging Candidate Experience that showcases your brand
4. Make your recruitment team’s life easier
5. Justify the resume of a candidate sent to the Hiring Manager with detailed analysis on various assessed parameters set for the roleScreenshot of Writing Ability Test ?

EYardstick goes a step ahead by adding Artificial Intelligence (AI) element to the evaluation process which automatically evaluates the Writings/Long Answers against 5 proven set criteria. 1. Style 2. Mechanics 3. Grammar 4. Orientation and 5.Usage, which gives an objective score by considering the length of the Writings/Long Answer within the given time, versus the above criteria.Screenshot of EYardstick Coding Tab
EYardstick is all about innovative ways of improving the candidate selection process, we go a step deep into making questions for the online coding test depending on their need, be it the Algorithm Based questions or Data Structures or Fix the Error kind of questions or case-wise built problem statement questions.