CoderPad vs. HirePro Video Interview

- To conduct a preliminary assessment round when there are multiple candidates to choose from. Helps you to filter out candidates on the basis of requirements. - The questions that are assigned for each test are different, so the probability of any two candidates getting the exact same questions is very less. -However, the questions are based on the same concepts so as to provide an equal ground to all the candidates.- However, if you have to choose from less number of candidates you are better off conducting normal interviews, as these tests are time-consuming for both interviewers and employers.

Incentivized

I really think the HirePro Video Interviews can be used for any industry (non-profit, for profit, governmental agencies, etc.). We have seen a ton of time saved as a result of this offering and it helps read a potential candidate before having to engage. We have cut an initial 20% of candidates as a result of this software! Worth it!!

• Large range of supported languages
• Code runs quickly
• Allows for intractability between interviewer and interviewee

Incentivized

• Manages candidates
• Has AI assisted enablement
• Remote access

Incentivized

• Code editor should be more responsive for auto suggestions
• Practice environment should be located in such a way that it should be found easily
• A transparent and publicly available pricing

Incentivized

• Assessing personality more accurately in candidates.
• Some of the questions are too simple.
• Time constraints sometimes.

Incentivized

CoderPad is incredibly easy to use, not much to note.

Incentivized

We did use other option other than CoderPad. Before CoderPad we were using references for hiring but then again the whole process of assessment was not easy. It takes time. CoderPad came to our lives through a reference and since then it has somewhat changed the way we see hiring.

Incentivized

HirePro Video Interview stacks up against Recruitee because we found that HirePro catered more to small businesses rather than Recruitee. It was difficult to manage that platform compared to HirePro. We also found it easier for applicants to use HirePro Video Interview. additonally, we found that HirePro was the cheaper alternative to Recruitee which made it an easier decision to go with HirePro.

Incentivized

• 10 working hours saved weekly which used to be spent on interviews
• Approximately 3 employees worth of manpower is saved
• The benefit of allowing assessment in multiple languages allowed the interviewee to concentrate on evaluation on the basis of underlying concepts

Incentivized

• Improved the efficiency of our interviews
• Solid ROI based on cost and benefits we have realized
• Better candidates have been hired since we started using HirePro Video Interview

Incentivized