CodinGame for Work vs. Indeed Assessments

If you are a tech recruiting, you might need to use an automation tool such as this. It will be more suitable for junior profile sourcing. Less appropriate for senior or architect-level openings. Great for technology-specific assessments, less appropriate for a full-stack technical assessment which will take 2 hours of the candidate's time.

Incentivized

If you are hiring office staff, it makes it easy to see who has the ability to use office equipment, communicate effectively, and be dependable. If you are hiring for a specific trade, it makes it easy to weed out applicants who not possess the skill sets needed for the job.

Incentivized

• Create ad-hoc technical assessments within minutes.
• Email bulk invites.
• Candidates get instant feedback.

Incentivized

• Saves time
• Efficient
• Easy to Use

Incentivized

• Adding cutting-edge technologies in a faster way.
• adding a "register link" so you can use a public link instead of personalized invitations.
• Additional reporting and analyzing capabilities.

Incentivized

• Let employers contribute to the assessment questions used for particular trades.
• Add more personality questions to help determine compatibility with coworkers.

Incentivized

Overall, support is good. It helps our operation to get better candidates, saves time and effort. It provides an extra step to help screen better candidates without putting in too much effort.

Incentivized

Indeed is much more user-friendly, and we get more qualified applicants. The only downfall is the price.

Incentivized

• Saved us team-wide 30+ working hours a week.
• Help us compare internal from external talent.
• Better candidate experience.

Incentivized

• Saves Time
• More Efficient

Incentivized