CodinGame for Work vs. Indeed Assessments

If you are a tech recruiting, you might need to use an automation tool such as this. It will be more suitable for junior profile sourcing. Less appropriate for senior or architect-level openings. Great for technology-specific assessments, less appropriate for a full-stack technical assessment which will take 2 hours of the candidate's time.

Incentivized

I would like it better if we could have the option to customize the questions in Indeed Assessments. It does save us time in screening, but I think it would be much better if we could have the option to customize and better construct the questions for candidates.

Incentivized

• Create ad-hoc technical assessments within minutes.
• Email bulk invites.
• Candidates get instant feedback.

Incentivized

• Saves time
• Efficient
• Easy to Use

Incentivized

• Adding cutting-edge technologies in a faster way.
• adding a "register link" so you can use a public link instead of personalized invitations.
• Additional reporting and analyzing capabilities.

Incentivized

• Customization
• Limited Options for some positions

Incentivized

Overall, support is good. It helps our operation to get better candidates, saves time and effort. It provides an extra step to help screen better candidates without putting in too much effort.

Incentivized

Indeed has more options when it comes to the competition. I have not seen specific questions for each job while using Glassdoor or ZipRecruiter. You can manually create questions on those websites to screen candidates manually but Indeed does the screening for you. It is more robust and easy to use for employers and candidates.

Incentivized

• Saved us team-wide 30+ working hours a week.
• Help us compare internal from external talent.
• Better candidate experience.

Incentivized

• Saves Time
• More Efficient

Incentivized