Cofense Triage vs. Cybereason Defense Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cofense Triage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Cofense Triage accelerates phishing qualification, investigation, and response by automating standard responses to suspicious emails to make analysts more efficient and driving out actionable intelligence, and providing incident response playbook.N/A
Cybereason Defense Platform
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Cybereason EDR consolidates intelligence about each attack into a Malop (malicious operation), a contextualized view of the full narrative of an attack. Each Malop organizes the relevant attack data into an easy-to-read, interactive graphical interface, providing a complete timeline, the flow of the attack in the network, and any malicious communications. Remediation actions can be automated or accomplished remotely with a click. The Cybereason Defense Platform empowers analysts of all…N/A
Pricing
Cofense TriageCybereason Defense Platform
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cofense TriageCybereason Defense Platform
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cofense TriageCybereason Defense Platform
Considered Both Products
Cofense Triage
Chose Cofense Triage
Cofense Triage is the product that has been used in the organization for almost 3 years now the overall performance triage shows is always good and never disappointing with every new release of the version they come up with the features which customers tell them as feedback or …
Cybereason Defense Platform

No answer on this topic

Features
Cofense TriageCybereason Defense Platform
Incident Response Platforms
Comparison of Incident Response Platforms features of Product A and Product B
Cofense Triage
6.4
35 Ratings
33% below category average
Cybereason Defense Platform
-
Ratings
Integration with Other Security Systems5.034 Ratings00 Ratings
Attack Chain Visualization6.127 Ratings00 Ratings
Centralized Dashboard7.735 Ratings00 Ratings
Live Response for Rapid Remediation6.731 Ratings00 Ratings
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Cofense Triage
-
Ratings
Cybereason Defense Platform
9.1
2 Ratings
7% above category average
Anti-Exploit Technology00 Ratings8.32 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)00 Ratings9.62 Ratings
Centralized Management00 Ratings9.62 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Infection Remediation00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Vulnerability Management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Malware Detection00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cofense TriageCybereason Defense Platform
Small Businesses
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Score 8.7 out of 10
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cofense TriageCybereason Defense Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
7.5
(38 ratings)
8.7
(2 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cofense TriageCybereason Defense Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
Cofense
The tool is very helpful in improving Phishing detection capabilities as it streamlines the process of analyzing user reports a lot. Besides it has a built-in mechanism of rating reporters(end-users) based on their historical performance. Downside - tool requires continuous resource investment to deliver best result. Tool is not helping too much in improving user-education, because automated response process is not immediate and is prone to errors
Read full review
Cybereason
I'd recommend Cybereason due to it's efficacy, low TCO, low false/positive rate. The product was easy to implement and maintain. One of the major advantages of using Cybereason is that it requires minimal training for level 1 users to use the tool.
Read full review
Pros
Cofense
  • Separating links and attachments contained in the email, and checking to see if they are known malicious.
  • Clustering like emails to save time when responding.
  • Providing risks scores with each cluster to give an estimate on which clusters should be addressed first.
Read full review
Cybereason
  • EDR
  • Forensics
  • Mitigation
  • Response
Read full review
Cons
Cofense
  • There are too many interdependent pieces which you have to acquire separately.
  • I think Cofense has a lot of capabilities and usefulness, but I think it's too a la carte.
  • We own Cofense and PhishMe currently and there are some gaping holes that require additional licensing to close.
Read full review
Cybereason
  • Slow support
  • Bugs on their interface
  • Log extraction
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cofense
Cofense is stable and provides easy to use solution to aid the investigation of emails as well as managing simulated phishing campaigns.
Read full review
Cybereason
No answers on this topic
Usability
Cofense
The interface is easy and intuitive.
Read full review
Cybereason
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Cofense
We've experienced zero downtime.
Read full review
Cybereason
No answers on this topic
Performance
Cofense
No slowness seen.
Read full review
Cybereason
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
Cofense
Training was through, relevant and easy to follow.
Read full review
Cybereason
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cofense
The other product had a lot of fails on the auto-processing and did not integrate well with our current environment. One issue had to do with the way it sends the submissions to its processing engine—our email gateway configuration would have blocked this traffic. I also did not like the user interface.
Read full review
Cybereason
Cybereason provides superior protection than either Microsoft or CrowdStrike and a better TCO. We receive less false positives than with Microsoft Defender and Cybereason is easier for level 1 users to use.
Read full review
Scalability
Cofense
We've experienced zero downtime
Read full review
Cybereason
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Cofense
  • Due to the integration potential, large amounts of time are saved on a daily basis.
  • Incident response time has dropped due to the increased information available by having access to phishing emails directly.
  • Staff are able to effectively learn how multiple tools in our environment are used by mastering Triage. This has decreased training time greatly and increased the effectiveness of each associate.
Read full review
Cybereason
  • Helps on threat hunting
  • MalOps is very good
  • When we face a bug, it takes too much time for them to respond
Read full review
ScreenShots

Cofense Triage Screenshots

Screenshot of Triage DashboardScreenshot of Triage Dashboard Cluster DetailsScreenshot of Triage Cluster DetailsScreenshot of Triage Cluster Malicious AttachmentScreenshot of Triage Cluster HeadersScreenshot of Triage Reporter Details