Cohesity vs. (EOL) Cisco CloudCenter

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cohesity
Score 8.5 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Cohesity is a leader in AI-powered data security and management. Cohesity protects the world’s most critical data workloads across on-prem, cloud-native, and SaaS with backup and recovery, threat intelligence, cyber vaulting, files and objects, and recovery orchestration.N/A
(EOL) Cisco CloudCenter
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Cisco CloudCenter (formerly CliQr CloudCenter) was an application-defined cloud management platform for deploying and administration of applications across datacenters, private, and public cloud resources. It has been discontinued by Cisco, and is no longer available for sale.N/A
Pricing
Cohesity(EOL) Cisco CloudCenter
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cohesity(EOL) Cisco CloudCenter
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
Cohesity(EOL) Cisco CloudCenter
Data Center Backup
Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Product A and Product B
Cohesity
9.2
55 Ratings
8% above category average
(EOL) Cisco CloudCenter
-
Ratings
Universal recovery8.050 Ratings00 Ratings
Instant recovery9.052 Ratings00 Ratings
Recovery verification8.948 Ratings00 Ratings
Business application protection8.948 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple backup destinations9.051 Ratings00 Ratings
Incremental backup identification9.053 Ratings00 Ratings
Backup to the cloud9.542 Ratings00 Ratings
Deduplication and file compression8.954 Ratings00 Ratings
Snapshots9.551 Ratings00 Ratings
Flexible deployment9.552 Ratings00 Ratings
Management dashboard9.954 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform support9.555 Ratings00 Ratings
Retention options10.055 Ratings00 Ratings
Encryption9.051 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise Backup
Comparison of Enterprise Backup features of Product A and Product B
Cohesity
8.8
7 Ratings
8% above category average
(EOL) Cisco CloudCenter
-
Ratings
Continuous data protection9.15 Ratings00 Ratings
Replication9.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Operational reporting and analytics8.47 Ratings00 Ratings
Malware protection8.77 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-location capabilities9.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Ransomware Recovery8.84 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cohesity(EOL) Cisco CloudCenter
Small Businesses
Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage
Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage
Score 9.7 out of 10
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.7 out of 10
Rubrik
Rubrik
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.7 out of 10
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cohesity(EOL) Cisco CloudCenter
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(65 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.6
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.9
(27 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Professional Services
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cohesity(EOL) Cisco CloudCenter
Likelihood to Recommend
Cohesity
Cohesity has been awesome. The performance (speed) that it has been able to provide has actually given me back time every month. I have to test my backups monthly, and the Cloning process that Cohesity has available from it's backup has given me days back each month. It just a few minutes I can have VMs restored for testing and documentation. This took a couple days with the previous vendor.
Read full review
Cisco
It is well suited for large corporate entities, whether they are in manufacturing, sales, engineering, healthcare, supply or shipping. It is easy to understand and operate once it has been initially configured. Expansion of the system is likewise easy to do once expertise has been acquired. The only difficulty with this or any cloud scenario is ensuring where the data is located and managing that securely.
Read full review
Pros
Cohesity
  • Easy to use and setup new backup and restore jobs.
  • Extremely fast recovery time, can spin a VMware backup VM up in well under a minute.
  • Granular recovery search options, easy to find specific files or systems to recover (or SQL DB).
Read full review
Cisco
  • We are able to automate deployment which has been a strength to the geographical distribution of the enterprise.
  • We have been able to work with a wider variety of developer tools and haven't had to customize to fit CloudCenter.
  • It is easier for us to allocate space and allow users to take advantage of the system directly with a minimum of overhead.
Read full review
Cons
Cohesity
  • Reporting could always be better- executive-style reports have to be generated from data at multiple points.
  • Some tasks that could be brought to the UI that today we have to call support on (for example when an NFS mount is still active but we cannot see it from the UI)
Read full review
Cisco
  • The software and systems don't present a problem to us but the continued interaction with mid-level support teams and vendors can slow down implementation or correction of difficulties we experience.
  • The continued overhead associated with peripheral training on systems we have purchased can cause delays.
  • Language barriers sometimes show up but this, again, is due to remote middle agents that are themselves contractors of or sales agents of the main agency. It slows down communication and can introduce business difficulties.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cohesity
We have been very pleased with this backup solution. It is fast and reliable, and supports our VMware infrastructure. The company's support has been great, including proactively replacing our nodes when the flash memory was reporting high wear. Support is offered on-shore as well. We plan on continuing to use this product for the foreseeable future.
Read full review
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Usability
Cohesity
Cohesity Helios is very easy to use and the web up is simple to navigate and the main dashboard presents a very good and clear overview summary of protection status, capacity and other vital metrics. If you have multiple clusters you can get a single pane view of overall status which is awesome.
Read full review
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Cohesity
Support is quick to respond but lacks that ongoing responsiveness if the issue is not simple. There will be large gaps in replies if they need to resort to escalation and when there are timezone differences between yourself and the person who picked up the ticket.
Read full review
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cohesity
We looked at Veeam and although it's a great product when we priced out the licensing of both primary and disaster datacenters it became much too expensive. Rubrik is a great product and very similar to Cohesity. In the end, Cohesity had a secondary storage play as well as a better UI and better compatibility with lower tier cloud storage. We also like the way Cohesity did protection jobs vs Rubrik's virtual machine centric backup. CommVault is a product we still use today due to its massive features and the ability for bare metal backups. Cohesity does a much better job in the area of UI simplicity, virtual backup ease, and ease of management.
Read full review
Cisco
We found that the cost advantages were greater by going with Cisco because of our present contracts and the materials and equipment we already had on hand. The reliability of the system, for us, outweighed any cost advantages we might have been realized by going with another provider. Certainly the service and support for the entire system is much better when handled by a single vendor with a good track record.
Read full review
Professional Services
Cohesity
Overall Cohesity professional services like the rest of Cohesity are brilliant. We had some poor advice around how to carve up our Netapp protection jobs which has set us back but it has been acknowledged that a mistake was made by Cohesity and they promise for future engagements with new customers the lessons learnt with us will be integrated into their planning workshop for NAS onboarding.
Read full review
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Cohesity
  • Several hours a week of admin time no longer needed to deal with tapes.
  • Many hours a year saved in that the admin no longer has to deal with LTO drives, LTO drive firmware, tape libraries, tape library firmware, a physical server connected to tape library, etc. Retired old legacy NAS devices that in some instances no longer had firmware updates. One system to administer and maintain.
  • Piece of mind. We replicate from our onsite cluster to an offsite cluster in the event of a DR event at HQ.
Read full review
Cisco
  • We have had a positive return on investment by adopting Cisco CloudCenter as the system is more mature than competitors. We have saved a lot by working with them rather than continuing to act as a defacto test location for other systems.
  • We have been able to reduce the number of staff necessary to operate the system and turn them over to more profitable work.
  • One negative impact we have seen is that it is difficult to map where the data is located at any specific instance.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Cohesity Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of