Commanders Act offers Enterprise Tag Manager, a product designed to handle website tags - and also SDKs in a single SDK container - through a management interface without the need for technical expertise.
N/A
Vero Cloud
Score8 out of 10
N/A
Vero Workflows is an email marketing solution built to make customer engagement simpler with features such as in-app behavior tracking, audience segmentation, and workflow automation.
$54
per month
Pricing
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager
Vero Cloud
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Starter
$54
per month
Pro
$219
per month
Growth
$549
per month
Enterprise
$1,429
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager
Vero Cloud
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
—
15% discount applied with an annual subscription, paid upfront.
More Pricing Information
Features
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager
Vero Cloud
Security
Comparison of Security features of Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager and Vero Cloud
Feature
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager
7.0
1 Ratings
19% below category average
Vero Cloud
-
Ratings
Role-based user permissions
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Tag Management
Comparison of Tag Management features of Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager and Vero Cloud
Feature
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager
7.0
1 Ratings
14% below category average
Vero Cloud
-
Ratings
Tag library
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Tag variable mapping
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ease of writing custom tags
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Rules-driven tag execution
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Tag performance monitoring
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Management & Integrity
Comparison of Data Management & Integrity features of Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager and Vero Cloud
Feature
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager
6.0
1 Ratings
30% below category average
Vero Cloud
-
Ratings
Event tracking
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Universal data layer
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated error checking
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager and Vero Cloud
Feature
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager
-
Ratings
Vero Cloud
8.1
2 Ratings
1% above category average
WYSIWYG email editor
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Dynamic content
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Mobile optimization
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
List management
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager and Vero Cloud
If you need a single place where you can handle all the third party pixels, this is a well-suited platform. As well as if you want to keep the deployment independent from all other (and more complex) deployments driven by IT. If you need a pixel to be fired not just when the page loads, but based on user actions, you should use the events and that's pretty complex to handle.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Vero tends to play nice with companies that have their websites as the primary source of truth. This allows them to send as many events as they need and develop more complex workflows that introduce conditionality into Vero emails. However, for those that rely more on Salesforce, it might have more limited applications. The product is fairly easy to use, so it's easy for multiple people on the team to pick it up and do what they need for their respective groups. On the other hand, creating email templates will require some knowledge of HTML/CSS, unless those are copied from another source. That would require another product of course that provides more robust layout editing features and templates.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reports. Tag Commander lacks in term of reports of what's happening. There is an additional module called Attribution Management System that gives you a lot of insights, but more basic reports to understand what has been fired will be useful.
Support. Tag Commander support is very low responsive. It took several days to have the first feedback and generally, it takes a lot of emails to get what you need.
Deduplication engine flexibility. The engine is there and it works pretty well, until you have a slightly different need. In that case you need to implement something custom in terms of implementation, reports, etc. A more flexible approach would be useful.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
While Vero offers some WYSIWYG editing, it's on the limited side, as it mostly allows you to edit copy, but not necessarily the layout.
The UI/UX has improved dramatically over the course of the last few years, but it can still lag from time to time and experience sluggishness.
While reliability is really good, it does have lapses from time to time that will introduce delays into emails being sent out. Once or twice, the system went completely down for a period of time.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Vero's price tag is far more attractive but for what you will find to be clear and obvious reasons. Vero has no CRM unlike HubSpot and Infusionsoft. Vero also has limited tracking unlike the seemingly endless possibilities offered from HubSpot which as we all know comes with at a significant cost, often not feasible by a small startup company.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It let us deploy new pixels/fixes to pixels independently from the IT deployment process.
It let us easily turn on/off and sort the pixel execution based on partners' priority, assuring better data tracking for more important partners.
It provides out of the box pixel implementation for tons of partners, but really often we need to rewrite the pixel from scratch as they're not up to date.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The overall costs of using Vero have been much lower than using two comparable products that handle transactional emails and newsletters, respectively. MailChimp has relatively recently integrated their Mandrill product for transactional emails, so that's worth looking at as well.
Using a single product for many things lowers the learning curve, as team members only have to learn one product well, rather than several.
While infrequent, Vero's outages have impacted our operations at times. If absolute reliability is crucial to your business, then you may have to find a larger provider with a more robust infrastructure. As mentioned, though, it hasn't been a big problem for us.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info