The CompTIA Information Sharing and Analysis Organization (ISAO) helps technology companies defend against threats that are increasingly targeted and malicious, with the potential to seriously harm the industry’s credibility, by tailoring proactive threat intelligence and actionable analysis to meet the needs of technology vendors, managed services providers (MSPs), solution providers, integrators, distributors, business technology consultants, and their customers.
N/A
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
Score5 out of 10
N/A
The PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform is a talent management platform designed for Higher Education and Government organizations, now from PowerSchool (acquired August, 2018). Modules include analytics, applicant tracking, position management, onboarding, records management, and performance management.
N/A
Pricing
CompTIA ISAO
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CompTIA ISAO
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Contact vendor for pricing information.
—
More Pricing Information
Features
CompTIA ISAO
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of CompTIA ISAO and PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
Feature
CompTIA ISAO
-
Ratings
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
7.7
8 Ratings
6% above category average
New hire portal
00 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
00 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
00 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of CompTIA ISAO and PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
Feature
CompTIA ISAO
-
Ratings
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
5.8
3 Ratings
23% below category average
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Individual goal setting
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
00 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Performance tracking
00 Ratings
2.03 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of CompTIA ISAO and PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
Feature
CompTIA ISAO
-
Ratings
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
2.7
3 Ratings
87% below category average
Performance plans
00 Ratings
4.02 Ratings
Plan weighting
00 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
00 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
Review status tracking
00 Ratings
4.03 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
00 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
Review reminders
00 Ratings
4.02 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
00 Ratings
1.02 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
00 Ratings
4.02 Ratings
Reporting
00 Ratings
1.03 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of CompTIA ISAO and PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
Feature
CompTIA ISAO
-
Ratings
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
7.3
4 Ratings
7% above category average
Create succession plans/pools
00 Ratings
6.33 Ratings
Candidate ranking
00 Ratings
7.04 Ratings
Candidate search
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Candidate development
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of CompTIA ISAO and PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
CompTIA is well suited for both new and experiences IT professionals to study and gain certifications that will help them in their professional lives. The functionality is great for client service as you can access the platform at any time and study on your own time. It may be less appropriate for someone who prefers live learning.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Organizations who have very few applications and/or very few positions posted are probably less likely to benefit as high from PeopleAdmin. Large organizations who have several positions and/or several applications/applicants can definitely benefit from this product. This product is not as well suited for performance management as I had hoped because there is not a lot of freedom to creating and designing different evaluations for different position types in the system when you have an organization that has thousands of different employees and types.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Applicant tracking was a good use of this tool for our department. I think it could use a few more customization features but overall it was a good tool to weed out applicants who were not qualified for the position.
The system has some canned reporting tools that also worked well for our department and management needs.
It was a great place to house our position descriptions and provided a readily accessible source for hiring managers to make requested updates and changes and for employees to see and have access to their position descriptions.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
PeopleAdmin's internal report writer needs work. Currently, in version 7, reporting can only be done requisition number by requisition number. The report writer needs to be modified so it can create reports enterprise-wide.
PeopleAdmin's Data Mart product needs substantial modification. In version 5.8, on a monthly basis, PeopleAdmin provided us with an Microsoft Access database containing our historical data up to that period end. In version 7, the "Data Mart" contains our historical data. The Data Mart consists of over 300 files. These files are not database table downloads nor is it parts of a database data dump. Rather, the files appear to be scrapes from html pages. They contain html codes and other character data that needs to be cleaned before they can be uploaded. The files are not in a table-by-table format. Any one file can contain data from two or more tables. The format of the Data Mart makes it difficult to load the data into a database and format it in a table structure that is comparable to the Access database provided with version 5.8.
We are evaluating our options as it relates to PeopleAdmin. We are likely to renew as we can not find another product that gives us the functionality we have with PeopleAdmin 5.8 in the area of Position Description. Outside of that, we would likely be close to finding another product solution.
CompTIA was selected due to the numerous certifications that they offer and the ability for professionals to stack the certificates and gain additional knowledge all on one platform. The other platforms we have used have been very limited in the number and topics of certifications that were offered where CompTIA thrives in this area.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I've used both Target Recruit and HR Smart. When working with Target Recruit it quickly became apparent it was not the right solution for us. Another solution we examined prior to selection PeopleAdmin was iCIMS. iCIMS is a very social system but was not as familiar with the Higher Education recruitment processes as was PeopleAdmin.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info