ConceptDraw PROJECT is a project management tool providing a set of options to plan
and implement projects successfully, and belongs to the ConceptDraw OFFICE suite. The core features of the tool are task and resource management and reporting, along with change control. The vendor says managing multiple projects is simple due to the Gantt Chart and Multi-Project Views and shared Resource Pool. Tasks that occur on a…
N/A
Taskworld
Score9.9 out of 10
N/A
Taskworld is a project management solution built around task management and collaboration capabilities.
$8
per month per user
Pricing
ConceptDraw PROJECT
Taskworld
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Free
$0
Premium
$8
per month per user
Business
$15
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ConceptDraw PROJECT
Taskworld
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Price varies for Individual, Commercial, Academic, Nonprofit and Government
Plans are billed annually.
More Pricing Information
Features
ConceptDraw PROJECT
Taskworld
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of ConceptDraw PROJECT and Taskworld
Feature
ConceptDraw PROJECT
9.0
3 Ratings
16% above category average
Taskworld
7.4
2 Ratings
4% below category average
Task Management
9.63 Ratings
8.82 Ratings
Resource Management
9.63 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Gantt Charts
9.63 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scheduling
9.53 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Email integration
10.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
7.01 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
7.93 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Team Collaboration
00 Ratings
9.22 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
00 Ratings
6.92 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Document Management
00 Ratings
5.52 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
7.52 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of ConceptDraw PROJECT and Taskworld
Getting started - using the Gantt chart to enter tasks in any order and then using those tasks to initially define a MindMap to further explore alternative dependencies. The alternative works better when initiating a project with significant unknowns.
I don't know anything about pricing, but if Taskworld were an inexpensive choice I would say it works fairly well for small to mid-sized companies with complex workflows. It's great for managing tasks that move through multiple-stage pipelines that aren't necessarily linear. However, depending on the price it's not worth the spend for all the technical difficulties it brought. Our company was relatively small (60 employees) and yet we constantly faced "server issues" and bugs and even software-wide crashes that seriously impacted our ability to do business. If you choose to go with Taskworld, be sure you have a solid disaster-management plan in place just in case, because chances are you'll experience bugs on a weekly basis
Integration with ConceptDraw Mindmap makes work breakdown very easy.
We have cross-functional teams where team members often work on different projects in parallel. The multi project management feature has been a blessing over these years.
Another import feature is the availability of many different predefined report generation templates that made it very easy to communicate different aspects of the project to different stakeholders.
Task Management - It's super easy to track progress on Taskworld. If your team keeps up with it, you'll never wonder where in the project someone is, because it's marked.
Project checklists - Having these to organize out smaller portions of the tasks makes everything so much easier and helps keep track of progress.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Taskworld crashed ALL THE TIME. It was so frustrating. You'd notice certain functions not working (like adding an additional location or reassigning a task) and then the whole thing would go down. We lost at least 3 individual business days due to Taskworld acting up.
We often requested features and bug fixes that took forever to be resolved. Taskworld staff was responsive, but issues took too long to resolve. As a small example, the GIF functionality of chat and task communication was down for weeks with no explanation.
Small glitches were frequent and obnoxious. We had to clear caches all the time in hopes that we'd be able to use Taskworld the way it was intended. There were many times employees didn't get notified of their "@ mentions" or weren't seeing notifications at all. It was a nightmare of death by a thousand cuts.
I can't say too much about the support we've gotten from Taskworld, because we haven't needed it. There haven't been any issues we've to have to reach out about because it works too well. Given the quality of the application, I'm sure the quality of the support follows.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
ConceptDraw has a much simpler licensing and pricing model. Perpetual license and ability to use in offline mode was an important criteria for us. Perfect bundle for small and medium business.
We used Basecamp very briefly before switching over to Taskworld. Basecamp wasn't nearly as dynamic as Taskworld and served more as a static archive than an active workflow software.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info