Conga Sign vs. Leap

It is well-suited for most of the clients which have trust in digital signatures and want to reduce the turnaround, but there are still some clients which do not prefer digital signatures and prefer printed agreements with wet signatures. Conga uses the latest digital signing legal regulations so this is a customer-to-customer issue.

Incentivized

Leap (formerly JobProgress) helped us automate and simply our processes. We chose it over competitors because we were able to customize it to the different service offerings we provided - other platforms seem to be designed for one type of service or another making them problematic. We were able to reduce the number of software providers we use and integrate others that we were using separately. It is designed well to track [potential] jobs, but it does not work well for tracking business development opportunities.

Incentivized

• Salesforce Integration
• E-signatures
• Document Tracking

Incentivized

• Customizable
• Integrations
• Cost
• Implementation
• Automation

Incentivized

• Guiding Signers to Completion
• More user-friendly coding
• Resend links reminders, not new documents for signature
• Automatic cancellations

Incentivized

• Reporting
• Deadlines on updates
• Lists populate differently (e.g., alphabetical vs. order they were created)

Incentivized

We're a relatively high-skilled team and we all find Conga Sign's user-friendliness very low for all user types. It should not take a highly skilled tech person to complete documents. Documents need to be user friendly for all user types.

Incentivized

Conga's success team was excellent and very responsive.

Incentivized

We prefer Conga as it integrates well with our other Conga products such as Conga CPQ, Conga CLM, and Salesforce. Integration is very easy and documents get triggered for signature with just a click and the signing process is also very easy for the end user which makes the quoting cycle relatively quicker.

Incentivized

We evaluated close to ten other platforms including Dataforma, Job Nimbus, AccuLynx, Propeller, FCS, etc., but chose Leap (formerly JobProgress) because of the flexibility it offered - customize our service offerings and how jobs flow through our process, automation through the process, integration with other vendors, and ease of use for the office and field.

Incentivized

• Quicker sales
• ROI
• Appreciated by customers
• Paperless contracts

Incentivized

• Reduced cost - moved from 3 software providers to 1
• Gave field technicians greater capabilities and moved to paperless processes
• Automation and simplification of processes

Incentivized