Contentful is a cloud based CMS solution that provides the ability to manage content across multiple platforms.The editing interface allows for managing content interactively and provides developers the ability to deliver the content with the programming language and template framework of their choice.
$0
Pantheon
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Pantheon is a WebOps platform where marketers and developers collaborate to drive results. The vendor states that with Pantheon, site owners maximize their capacity to update website design and functionality, responding to market trends, catering to consumer behavior, and adding real value to the business's bottom line. Today, companies compete on the basis of digital experiences, and the best results emerge from an agile build-test-learn process. Whether it's publishing content,…
$29
per month
Pricing
Contentful
Pantheon
Editions & Modules
Lite
$300
per month
Community
Free
Enterprise
Custom
Basic
$29
per month
Performance
$114
per month
Elite
Contact for quote
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Contentful
Pantheon
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
Optional
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Contentful
Pantheon
Features
Contentful
Pantheon
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Contentful
8.5
10 Ratings
3% above category average
Pantheon
-
Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.510 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Contentful
9.5
12 Ratings
21% above category average
Pantheon
-
Ratings
API
9.311 Ratings
00 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language
9.79 Ratings
00 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Contentful
7.8
13 Ratings
0% above category average
Pantheon
-
Ratings
WYSIWYG editor
7.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness
9.58 Ratings
00 Ratings
Admin section
9.311 Ratings
00 Ratings
Page templates
7.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Library of website themes
7.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design
4.57 Ratings
00 Ratings
Publishing workflow
9.312 Ratings
00 Ratings
Form generator
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Contentful
9.4
12 Ratings
23% above category average
Pantheon
-
Ratings
Content taxonomy
10.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
SEO support
10.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bulk management
9.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions
9.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Community / comment management
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Contentful
Pantheon
Small Businesses
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
It's a great all rounder for content projects. It's easy in the basics and powerful in the complex, data heavy scenarios. Extending the platform is straightforward and the SDK gives you everything you need. If you have many many varying content types , it gets expensive and perhaps not the best choice .
Pantheon is excellent for medium-large websites that require high availability and a managed workflow. It would be inappropriate for small websites because of the cost or for situations where more control of the environment is appropriate. We find it useful because we rarely do anything outside of the Drupal application.
Contentful uses "references" to allow you to build very modular content. If I have a "slider" content type, I can create a "slide" content type which references a "button" content type, and so forth. This works well, but I occasionally wish there was a better solution for one-off content, like a settings page. Currently, this is done for creating an entire content type called "settings" with a single entry. Not a big deal, but not ideal, either.
There are a few quirks with GatsbyJS integration, etc, but these issues are being fixed and improved upon very quickly.
A minor gripe, but Contentful does not have a way to organize fields within an entry. Entries with many fields are somewhat tiresome to scroll through.
It is a very easy to use and configure application. I find that it is on the user to manage the content after the models have been created, yet I still do not encounter issues finding or creating new components for our site. It is easy to set up and easy to navigate.
Pantheon is an easy system, especially to the users with previous experience with other similar platform and the interface is clear enough to easily understand how things operates. On the Cloud deployment everything also works effectively and the technical team from Pantheon community are very helpful on providing the necessary assistant to their customers.
Even tier 1 Pantheon chat and ticket support are knowledgeable, competent, and useful. They routinely understand and promptly resolve urgent, complex, and/or unusual issues that other hosts need to escalate to tier 2 or tier 3 support personnel. I honestly can't think of a truly negative or disappointing support experience in the years I've used Pantheon hosting for client websites.
Easy to use and much more organized as a single platform versus multi. The layout is clean and easy to read and we don’t have to worry about certain users safe guarding data or content then losing it when they leave the company. It’s a one stop shop for imagery
Although it may seem a good fit for a company that needs extra control over the deployment process and development process, for a firm that is mainly concentrating on SEO, it would be an overkill. Pantheon provides that sweet automation that allows us to shed some weight on development and focus on our business activities.
Contentful has saved us valuable development time that was previously spent doing deploys for minor content updates.
Contentful has helped us maintain consistent documentation, reducing time needed to review for consistency.
Can't say we've really experienced any negative ROI impacts from using Contentful, but we've run into some limitations in adding too many content models and the next pricing tier is substantially more expensive.