CoreIntegrator Workflow vs. Power Apps

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CoreIntegrator Workflow
Score 10.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
CoreIntegrator in Hummelstown provides AP Automation, built on the CoreIntegrator Workflow platform their solution provides organizations with made-to-order forms and workflows to meet purchasing workflow needs. Automate the Purchasing Department by streamlining Purchase Requisition, PO Matching and Journal Entry processes.N/A
Power Apps
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
PowerApps is a low code / rapid application development product from Microsoft that allows users to quickly build apps.
$20
per month per user
Pricing
CoreIntegrator WorkflowPower Apps
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Power Apps Premium
$20
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CoreIntegrator WorkflowPower Apps
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsSince the final solution is catered to the specific needs of the customer, the pricing varies from case to case.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CoreIntegrator WorkflowPower Apps
Features
CoreIntegrator WorkflowPower Apps
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
CoreIntegrator Workflow
-
Ratings
Power Apps
7.9
24 Ratings
6% below category average
Visual Modeling00 Ratings8.022 Ratings
Drag-and-drop Interfaces00 Ratings7.823 Ratings
Platform Security00 Ratings8.723 Ratings
Platform User Management00 Ratings8.123 Ratings
Reusability00 Ratings7.423 Ratings
Platform Scalability00 Ratings7.622 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CoreIntegrator WorkflowPower Apps
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Webexpenses
Webexpenses
Score 8.7 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CoreIntegrator WorkflowPower Apps
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(3 ratings)
9.3
(23 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(4 ratings)
Support Rating
7.7
(2 ratings)
9.7
(6 ratings)
User Testimonials
CoreIntegrator WorkflowPower Apps
Likelihood to Recommend
CoreIntegrator
I have found CoreIntegrator to work well for our needs as an Accounts Payable workflow solution. The system was implemented with very little internal technical assistance. It can be administered by a business user without a great deal of technical knowledge because the CI support staff is knowledgeable and helpful.
Read full review
Microsoft
Power Apps is ideal for scenarios that are neither too complex nor too large. It is easy to begin development in Power Apps, as it is one of the best tools for low-code development. Power Apps can be implemented for complex scenarios as well, provided there is strong knowledge of the tool and ample time for planning. Our applications benefit from Power Apps' cross-platform support, making it easy to use on any device, including desktops, laptops, and mobile devices.
Read full review
Pros
CoreIntegrator
  • Integration to Great Plains
  • Simple to use
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Power Apps has formats that are pre-built that don't require any coding which makes it easier to achieve your vision. This does become a challenge if your App needs don't fit into that format.
  • We deal with a ton of data so the fact that you can connect to any data source in addition to their pre-stablished data connections makes the process a breeze.
  • The online learning resources and tutorials are helpful as well for those who are tech savvy.
Read full review
Cons
CoreIntegrator
  • The system administration is somewhat difficult for someone that is not highly technical.
  • Deleted or removed items appear in search results.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Sometimes the cost of solutions is greater than the benefit. Licensing is expensive relative to the scope of some business user-created personal or team-level solutions.
  • While there is a starter-kit for Governance, it is complicated to stand up and requires dedicated resources to provide on-going governance operations. Many organizations are not going to be able to dedicate resources to governance and this causes the sprawl, solution duplication, silos, unneeded and unplanned licensing expenses, and a general "wild wild west" environment.
  • There needs to be better direction and best practices given around Power Platform Environment utilization and optimization.
  • The accessibility to the platform and ease for business partners to independantly create solutions is both a benefit and a negative. When the business outcome needed is a good fit for PowerApps it is a quick win, but when not a good fit it becomes a frustration for the business partner attempting to make the platform do something it is not well-suited for. The business partner entangles tech teams in the effort which drains resources and provides a lack-luster solution. All of this to say, it would be beneficial to have some tools that business partners could leverage to determine\understand if the type of business outcome they need is well suited to PowerApps or not.
Read full review
Usability
CoreIntegrator
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
PowerApps is a great solution and I have spent the last year familiarizing myself with the platform and building custom applications to complete a whole range of tasks such as asset management, custom invoice generation, and item restriction tracking. We as a company have barely begun to scratch the surface of what can be achieved with PowerApps.
Read full review
Support Rating
CoreIntegrator
Sometimes we receive slow responses.
Read full review
Microsoft
The community forums are extremely responsive to questions asked, there is a good body of online documentation and many community posts to draw from. Although the platform has changed, which means some of the posts are out of date and the solutions provided aren't relevant. Of relevance, I read over 400 articles plus documentation to get this first app built in SharePoint, move it to SQL and make it work exactly the way it should.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
CoreIntegrator
We didn't review another product because CoreIntegrator so perfectly met our needs.
Read full review
Microsoft
1. PowerApps functionality comes with E1 over E3 License without adding extra costs 2. For Nintex you pay (at the beginning) for each workflow, so my intention would be, to do no workflows to prevent additional costs, but I want a platform with a fair price that allows me to create workflows without thinking about the price for each workflow and we use only some workflow and relative easy workflows and forms as a medium-sized company. 3. PowerApps provides a lot of functionality without needing to invest in premium features directly.
Read full review
Return on Investment
CoreIntegrator
  • Time saving outweighs the cost.
  • Ease of use is so much better than most software solutions.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Automation of manual processes brings an ROI on labor costs.
  • Intake of data provides clean database design.
  • Connectivity to data-lake provides insights and trends into the data.
  • Able to scale operations with efficiencies provided by the app.
  • Can mature the process and workflows to do more.
Read full review
ScreenShots

CoreIntegrator Workflow Screenshots

Screenshot of Invoice processingScreenshot of Items assigned to user for review