CrowdStrike Falcon vs Tenable.sc (formerly SecurityCenter)

• Detects and automatically blocks dangerous behavior on endpoints that could be indicative of malicious activity, like executing programs from the deleted items folder, executing a SSH command in silent mode from different places in the OS, etc.
• Monitors endpoints continuously for known malware, evaluates dangerous behaviors and blocks execution based on risk tolerance settings, uses AI to draw correlations on multiple attack vectors, and has a human malware hunting element to detect known or newly detected attack vectors.
• Is easy to deploy across a large organization and manage centrally by as few as 1 person part time.
• This was the fastest and easiest implementation of an enterprise grade security system I have ever done. I pushed software to the endpoints on a Friday afternoon, and was complete by Noon on Monday, as each workstation came online, the installer completed, and we were protected.

Read full review

• Vulnerability management from one place
• Maximum endpoint visibility
• Easy to set up and plan the structure
• Support desk quickly responses
• Well-prepared documentation
• Broad scanning type
• Supports various compliance standards
• User groups allows coordination between teams

Read full review

• Falcon isn't continuously scanning the machine, if something is downloaded and viewed as safe it won't be re-checked later.
• More dashboards and information on vulnerabilities on the machines would be helpful.
• More reports that could be given to executives would also be beneficial. There are some now, but the options are rather limited.

Read full review

• Tenable could make it easier to report on missing reg key.
• Tenable can also make it easier to report on os level patches vs application patches.

Read full review

• A significant increase in responsiveness to data security incidents.
• The frequency and extent of data security issues have been drastically reduced.

Read full review

• ROI from Tenable suite of products has been well worth its cost.
• Their pricing model has changed and they charge higher than their competitors but for the usage we have currently it serves us well.
• Customization might not be what was expected but I believe we are using the tool to the fullest.

Read full review