Atlassian Crucible (discontinued) vs. Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Atlassian Crucible (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Atlasssian Crucible is a peer review tool for finding bugs and defects in version control tools Subversion, Git, Mercurial, CVS, and Perforce. In 2025, Atlassian discontinued new sales of Crucible. The product is being sunsetted.N/A
Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
Redgate's SQL Toolbelt Essentials includes industry-standard tools for SQL Server development & deployment, enabling users to include SQL Server databases in agile processes and enabilng developers to embed robust and scalable development practices.N/A
Pricing
Atlassian Crucible (discontinued)Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Atlassian Crucible (discontinued)Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Atlassian Crucible (discontinued)Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Considered Both Products
Atlassian Crucible (discontinued)
Chose Atlassian Crucible (discontinued)
Not exactly an apples to apples comparison. Back when we were using SVN, Crucible was the go-to solution for code review. As we started moving to use Git and using pull requests (via Bitbucket), code review is now performed by using pull requests exclusively.
Chose Atlassian Crucible (discontinued)
Crucible has a better look and feel for developers because it is web compatible and works well with IE or Chrome.
Being that it is a web browser friendly, using Crucible is seamless and user-friendly.
Github is an external tool on a different environment that requires more …
Chose Atlassian Crucible (discontinued)
Crucible was first on the market and the price is inexpensive. Crucible integrates with Jira Software and Atlassian Fisheye, providing the ability to track defects efficiently. Sonarqube compares code to 'best standards' but not 'internal standards' and does not integrate to …
Chose Atlassian Crucible (discontinued)
I think Crucible isn't quite as clean as Stash/Bitbucket, but it does some things better, like seeing individual commits easier. I also like how stash groups all comments on the overview of the Pull Request.
Chose Atlassian Crucible (discontinued)
Gitlab and Github are very comparable to Crucible, and would probably be my first choice if those were the tools used for versioning as they are directly linked to git. Crucible was chosen by a current client and I had no choice in its selection. I would probably have chosen …
Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Chose Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Honestly, due to prior experience, we just have stuck with Redgate. Great tool and no reason to look anywhere else.
Chose Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
I've used Visual Studio Database Projects for this type of work in the past with some success, but Redgate SQL Compare is faster, more transparent, and simply easier to use.
Faster is self explanatory.
More transparent, means that it's much easier to set up your desired options …
Chose Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
We did not consider other products before choosing Redgate.
Chose Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Redgate SQL is better.
Chose Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
I've been using Redgate SQL Compare for 15+ years and have no desire or need to look for anything to replace it.
Chose Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
We only looked at Redgate SQL Compare if I recall correctly.
Chose Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
I haven't felt the need to try many different products like Redgate.
Chose Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
I was familiar with the quality of Redgate's products at the time of making the purchase decision. I checked out a trial version to make sure I could achieve what I wanted from the application, but I never made comparisons with other vendors tools on this occasion. …
Chose Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
We haven't compared SQL Compare with other tools in a VERY long time because they are honestly THE BEST.
Chose Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Honestly, I have never been interested in the usable alternatives. I have always been good to use it. The license cost after all has always been sustainable. I never had the idea of \ u200b \ u200bchanging it nor the need to look at other software. Also (always a redgate …
Chose Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
We have used Symantecs Database Agents for Backup Exec and Veeam's Database Backup products. Symantec does not stack up well as compared to Redgate. Veeam is a considerable contender with their SQL Server Explorer. In some scenarios I would prefer to use VEEAM over Redgate, …
Chose Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Frankly, I came into a RedGate equipped database shop and never considered looking for anything else. I didn't find RedGate, it found me. When I leave one company, to go to a new company I immediately make sure there are licenses to Toolbelt Essentials. It's that important to …
Best Alternatives
Atlassian Crucible (discontinued)Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Small Businesses
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.2 out of 10
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.6 out of 10
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.4 out of 10
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Atlassian Crucible (discontinued)Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Likelihood to Recommend
7.4
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.6
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Atlassian Crucible (discontinued)Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Likelihood to Recommend
Depends on the version control and devops process your development teams adopt. Git (via Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, etc...) has become the new industry norm, and using pull requests can often provide the same code review features Crucible is used for. However, if you require code review beyond change/diff based (i.e. via pull request), then Crucible allows you to review code with more granular control, such as on per file basis.
Read full review
We use SQL Compare to troubleshoot performance problems quite a bit since our data model is more like a template and not everything is 100% in sync and customization occurs between different client databases. We continually get pulled into performance issues and the developers will say Client A is performing different than Client B, why? Using SQL Compare, we usually find that one client was tuned and had indexes altered or added that weren't deployed to all clients or other objects weren't deployed correctly during the release. On the other hand, since our data model practices allow client databases to drift I tried to create a new golden image by trying to compare multiple databases based on the same data model and found it to be a very difficult process to complete using SQL Compare. SQL Compare gave me too much information and doesn't allow enough filtering to eliminate a lot of the noise.
Read full review
Pros
  • Easily add comments, identify defects, gather peer input.
  • 24/7 input from peers eases developer schedules and location independence.
  • Email notifications filtered by group or individuals provide control of who gets notifications, and who can submit comments.
Read full review
  • Simple and easy comparison of database schemas and data. Differences can be copied or synced from one database to another with a click of a button.
  • You can save "projects" so that you can easily rerun a previous comparison whenever you need to.
  • It has a very simple, easy to learn interface. I've never needed to read any documentation or watch any tutorials in order to figure out how to do something.
Read full review
Cons
  • It can sometimes be a bit slow to load. A server reboot for us tends to solve that issue. I'm not sure if it is a server issue, or maybe Crucible may have some caching issues.
  • I wish that you could easily stop the review creation process, rather than abandoning it.
Read full review
  • Pricing.... I wish there was an inexpensive developer version I could buy for myself.
  • Portability.... I would like to use it from a flash drive so I can use it where ever I am asked to work.
  • Unbundled.... This may be available already but I dont' recall I can buy it cheaply as a stand-alone product. Its only part of the bundle - cost effectively.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
It's a good tool to have, but becomes expensive to buy a user license for each developer.
Read full review
Support Rating
Good support overall being an Atlassian product, with options including free/paid official support and community provided help.
Read full review
They have a great community website where you can search for answers but are also very responsive when it comes to direct support.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Gitlab and GitHub are very comparable to Crucible, and would probably be my first choice if those were the tools used for versioning as they are directly linked to git. Crucible was chosen by a current client and I had no choice in its selection. I would probably have chosen GitHub if given a say.
Read full review
I've used Visual Studio Database Projects for this type of work in the past with some success, but Redgate SQL Compare is faster, more transparent, and simply easier to use. Faster is self explanatory. More transparent, means that it's much easier to set up your desired options for schema change deployment scripts. Easier to use, It's really dead simple. Start a project, connect your source, connect destination, click compare.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • I am not involved in the acquisition of Crucible so I cannot comment on the financial investment but I believe it is a necessary tool to have in any software shop, small or big.
  • As a developer, having Crucible as the code review process is a great asset and will save time and reduce risks which I believe is a positive return of investment.
Read full review
  • Makes deployment fairly simple. Cutting our deployment time down.
  • With the SDK, we can customize our deployment process very quickly and easily.
  • History is not great, it does create scripts you can go back and see but it would be nice to have a quicker version view by object to save time.
Read full review
ScreenShots