Crucible vs. Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Crucible
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Atlasssian Crucible is a peer review tool for finding bugs and defects in version control tools Subversion, Git, Mercurial, CVS, and Perforce.N/A
Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Redgate's SQL Toolbelt Essentials includes industry-standard tools for SQL Server development & deployment, enabling users to include SQL Server databases in agile processes and enabilng developers to embed robust and scalable development practices.
$1,209
per year per user (1-4 users)
Pricing
CrucibleRedgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CrucibleRedgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CrucibleRedgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
CrucibleRedgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Small Businesses
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.0 out of 10
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.0 out of 10
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce Helix Core
Perforce Helix Core
Score 6.3 out of 10
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CrucibleRedgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Likelihood to Recommend
7.4
(5 ratings)
8.6
(13 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
9.6
(2 ratings)
8.6
(5 ratings)
User Testimonials
CrucibleRedgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Likelihood to Recommend
Atlassian
Crucible is well suited for situations where development teams follow a branch-based merge process, where new features or automation stories are introduced. It allows more seasoned team members to check newer team members' code to ensure standards are followed. It is probably less appropriate for smaller development teams or smaller projects, where code reviews can be less formal.
Read full review
Redgate
We use SQL Compare to troubleshoot performance problems quite a bit since our data model is more like a template and not everything is 100% in sync and customization occurs between different client databases. We continually get pulled into performance issues and the developers will say Client A is performing different than Client B, why? Using SQL Compare, we usually find that one client was tuned and had indexes altered or added that weren't deployed to all clients or other objects weren't deployed correctly during the release. On the other hand, since our data model practices allow client databases to drift I tried to create a new golden image by trying to compare multiple databases based on the same data model and found it to be a very difficult process to complete using SQL Compare. SQL Compare gave me too much information and doesn't allow enough filtering to eliminate a lot of the noise.
Read full review
Pros
Atlassian
  • Supports all major source control systems such as SVN and Git.
  • Integration with Jira, Bamboo, Bitbucket, to have a complete end to end development experience.
  • Easy to use UI/UX for reviewing code changes amongst different team members.
Read full review
Redgate
  • Simple and easy comparison of database schemas and data. Differences can be copied or synced from one database to another with a click of a button.
  • You can save "projects" so that you can easily rerun a previous comparison whenever you need to.
  • It has a very simple, easy to learn interface. I've never needed to read any documentation or watch any tutorials in order to figure out how to do something.
Read full review
Cons
Atlassian
  • Crucible notifications of changes or updates to the code review are delayed as well as loading more source code is slow.
  • Crucible is formatting could use improvements for viewing customization features. For instance, allowing the user to create a new tab per file to be reviewed would be nice to have.
Read full review
Redgate
  • Pricing.... I wish there was an inexpensive developer version I could buy for myself.
  • Portability.... I would like to use it from a flash drive so I can use it where ever I am asked to work.
  • Unbundled.... This may be available already but I dont' recall I can buy it cheaply as a stand-alone product. Its only part of the bundle - cost effectively.
Read full review
Usability
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
Redgate
It's a good tool to have, but becomes expensive to buy a user license for each developer.
Read full review
Support Rating
Atlassian
Good support overall being an Atlassian product, with options including free/paid official support and community provided help.
Read full review
Redgate
They have a great community website where you can search for answers but are also very responsive when it comes to direct support.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Atlassian
Crucible was first on the market and the price is inexpensive. Crucible integrates with Jira Software and Atlassian Fisheye, providing the ability to track defects efficiently. SonarQube compares code to 'best standards' but not 'internal standards' and does not integrate to issue tracking. GitHub offers effective peer review, and has some integration with GitHub issues but costs more.
Read full review
Redgate
I've used Visual Studio Database Projects for this type of work in the past with some success, but Redgate SQL Compare is faster, more transparent, and simply easier to use. Faster is self explanatory. More transparent, means that it's much easier to set up your desired options for schema change deployment scripts. Easier to use, It's really dead simple. Start a project, connect your source, connect destination, click compare.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Atlassian
  • It has had a large ROI for our team, as it has helped us find issues sooner than we would have had we not reviewed things properly.
Read full review
Redgate
  • Makes deployment fairly simple. Cutting our deployment time down.
  • With the SDK, we can customize our deployment process very quickly and easily.
  • History is not great, it does create scripts you can go back and see but it would be nice to have a quicker version view by object to save time.
Read full review
ScreenShots