Cryoserver vs. FileHold Document Management
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryoserver | Score10 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | Cryoserver is an email archiving solution delivered either on-premises or in the cloud. It stores copies of every email sent and received by an organisation in a secure archive. It then turns this data into a resource for everyday use. Cryoserver is designed to keep business-critical information contained in email or IM is safe and retrievable. Cryoserver free trials available. | $0.35 per GB per month. |
FileHold Document Management | Score7.7 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | FileHold is a document and records management software. FileHold is integrated with both Microsoft Office and Microsoft Teams and provides secure single log in to both FileHold and Office 365. FileHold can be deployed on a customers own servers or private cloud or hosted by FileHold on the Azure Cloud Standard features include; document scanning, version control, search, tagging, full user audit trail, archiving and scheduled disposition. Out of the box, users can search the FileHold… | $30 per month per seat |
| Cryoserver | FileHold Document Management | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | $150 | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | With Cryoserver Cloud the price per GB reduces as the archive grows. i.e. 120TB will be ~$0.10 per GB per month. | In all cases the price per user will decrease as more users are added to the system. FileHold has many optional and custom features that can be chosen and will change the price. For outright purchase of a license there is an optional 20% per year support and upgrade fee. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Cryoserver | FileHold Document Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Amazon S3 Glacier Score9 out of 10 | M‑Files Score8.9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Google Vault Score9.5 out of 10 | Esker Score7.4 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ![]() Microsoft Exchange Online Archiving Score8.4 out of 10 | Tungsten Capture Score9.5 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Cryoserver | FileHold Document Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 | 7.0 |
| Usability | - | 6.0 |
| Performance | - | 7.0 |
| Ease of integration | - | 6.0 |
| Cryoserver | FileHold Document Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Cryoserver Screenshots | FileHold Document Management Screenshots |









