CyberCPR vs. Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull

[We use CyberCPR] for investigations on IT that are totally compromised. Using the cloud solution, you can be up and running in minutes with the advantage of being able to access the tool from anywhere on the internet. New users are onboarded quickly and can pick it up fast. It scales well from 3 users to 500 and the server load looks low.

If your email admins spend time manually pulling malicious emails, this tool will save them countless hours of work and will do it for them 24 x 7. So if a user receives a malicious email after-hours, TRAP will auto pull it from the affected user's mailbox and potentially save you from an IT disaster.

Incentivized

• Clean UI
• Easy to use
• Fast user onboarding
• Managed communications well

• Auto pull works great, even with our hybrid situation with 2 on premise exchange organizations.
• Reporting is good, nice graphs of all the actions.

Incentivized

• API development has been a long time coming

• Learning curve is steep.
• Interface can be clunky.
• Some interface items seem counter-intuitive.

Incentivized

It's easy to use and requires very little administrator hands on.

Incentivized

They are quick to respond and have talented support personnel.

Incentivized

It's simpler to use, doesn't cost vast sums (it's about 1/10 of the others looked at). Users like the cleaner UI and it's not complicated

I have never evaluated TRAP against another product.

Incentivized

• It's low cost means the ROI is higher
• The security means when needed, its there and ready to be used.
• The deployment options mean you can choose one to match budget.

• Chances of phishing attacks has decreased.
• Your employees don't have to do anything, so no impact on productivity.

Incentivized