Cybereason Defense Platform vs. Huntress

I'd recommend Cybereason due to it's efficacy, low TCO, low false/positive rate. The product was easy to implement and maintain. One of the major advantages of using Cybereason is that it requires minimal training for level 1 users to use the tool.

Incentivized

Huntress is great for a managed service provider to provide a better cybersecurity stack to their endpoints/customers. Some smaller clients cannot afford high-priced SOC services but require SOC-level protection. Along with a couple of other layers of security, Huntress provides peace of mind for the MSP that if a threat were to arise, they would be notified with specific instructions for dealing with that threat.

Incentivized

• EDR
• Forensics
• Mitigation
• Response

Incentivized

• Ease of deployment
• Non-intrusive to host system
• Fantastic support when something is going wrong
• Eager to dig in with you to figure out issues

Incentivized

• Slow support
• Bugs on their interface
• Log extraction

Incentivized

• [I] would like to see more SOC as a Service - service from them.
• [I would also like] improved Intune integration, especially with Windows Defender and the rest of the suite.

Easy to use and install. Not much to do on this end they do everything

Cybereason provides superior protection than either Microsoft or CrowdStrike and a better TCO. We receive less false positives than with Microsoft Defender and Cybereason is easier for level 1 users to use.

Incentivized

Pre-EDR Huntress is really unique in what it does. It is hard to directly compare that against anything since it is changed based

Incentivized

• Helps on threat hunting
• MalOps is very good
• When we face a bug, it takes too much time for them to respond

Incentivized

• Detections that antivirus misses
• Their price doubled recently so I had to talk to clients about the increase.
• The ROI is immediate for some clients and hasn't detected anything at others.

Incentivized