Autotask PSA is designed as a complete IT Business Management Platform for MSPs, now from Datto (resulting from the Autotask merger with Datto in 2017).
N/A
Ivanti LANDESK Service Desk (discontinued)
Score 5.8 out of 10
N/A
The Ivanti LANDESK ITSM Service Desk, powered by Heat (formerly the LANDESK Service Desk before LANDESK and Heat became Ivanti) was the company's ITSM / ITIL offering that has now been replaced by Ivanti Neurons for ITSM, the company's modern offering.
N/A
Pricing
Datto Autotask PSA
Ivanti LANDESK Service Desk (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Autotask PSA
Ivanti LANDESK Service Desk (discontinued)
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Datto Autotask PSA
Ivanti LANDESK Service Desk (discontinued)
Features
Datto Autotask PSA
Ivanti LANDESK Service Desk (discontinued)
Incident and problem management
Comparison of Incident and problem management features of Product A and Product B
Datto Autotask PSA
-
Ratings
Ivanti LANDESK Service Desk (discontinued)
8.3
7 Ratings
0% above category average
Organize and prioritize service tickets
00 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Expert directory
00 Ratings
7.94 Ratings
Service restoration
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Self-service tools
00 Ratings
8.07 Ratings
Subscription-based notifications
00 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
ITSM collaboration and documentation
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
ITSM reports and dashboards
00 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
ITSM asset management
Comparison of ITSM asset management features of Product A and Product B
Datto Autotask PSA
-
Ratings
Ivanti LANDESK Service Desk (discontinued)
5.7
6 Ratings
37% below category average
Configuration mangement
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Asset management dashboard
00 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Policy and contract enforcement
00 Ratings
1.23 Ratings
Change management
Comparison of Change management features of Product A and Product B
In my opinion, Datto Autotask is exceptionally complicated to set up, manage, and use on a daily basis. I would think the target market for this product would be someone managing a team of 20 - 50 people, possibly more. In my experience, for it to run properly you will need to dedicate at least half an FTE to running this product in an organization of that size per month. I would not recommend it for companies with less than 10 people or for companies that value quick communication with their clients. I would not recommend it for companies using Datto's RMM product. The integration exists, but it is clearly a bolt-on. They were not developed together and they are slow to talk to each other. Frequently you cannot add details from RMM sessions into the PSA without manually copying the ticket number, and if the ticket is more than a week old, then you can't even find it with the ticket number.
I would recommend this product to anyone looking for an ITSM solution. Overall the team is very easy to work with and the solution is on par with others in the market. We have no complaints about the product and we are scaling it to meet our growing needs.
The graphical calculations on time spent on requests, how long they were open for, who worked on a ticket last.
Grouping by priority so you can determine easier what needs to be addressed sooner rather then later. This also helps if Account Management has conversations a technician is not aware of so they can prioritize efficiently.
The email updates that are sent out to the technicians so they are aware of upcoming or stale tickets.
Datto Autotask PSA is a full featured product that can do almost anything you need. There is a significant learning curve to get started which requires several hours spent in product training. Additionally, several hours / days are needed to get clients imported, contracts configured, and integrations implemented. Once the setup and user training is complete, the product is very functional, but it's imperative to not get overwhelmed when starting out.
The portion of Autotask that we've used other companies for prior to using Autotask is the Endpoint Management. The Autotask Endpoint Management (AEM) portal integrates perfectly with their PSA/CRM tools. It's alerting features are much better than the above software as there aren't a bunch of superfluous and unneeded alerts. Instead, it only alerts for things that you specify that you want. Alerts aside, for the PSA/CRM, I don't have much to compare it to as Autotask was the first PSA we tried. It's hard to imagine a PSA having more features or doing a better job than Autotask.
They only system that I can compare against Service Desk is ConnectWise. With that in mind, I definitely see that Service Desk is much easier to maintain, design and improve. The visual representation of processes does assist with seeing how it's working. However, the window design is still severely lacking in comparison.
Our Help Desk agents have been able to streamline the incident process and we were able to create template for common types of calls like lock-outs and password resets. This has saved the help desk a ton of time and helps resolve customer issues more quickly
The change management module allowed us to completely transform our process. It is now simple and intuitive to enter a change and have it approved and worked.
The CMDB module has allowed us to begin tracking our assets in one place and seeing how they relate to each other. This is something that was not available prior and it has streamlined our organization.