What users are saying about
1 Rating
40 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 5.1 out of 100
1 Rating
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 10 out of 100

Feature Set Ratings

    Project Management

    Digital.ai Agility

    Feature Set Not Supported
    N/A
    9.5

    Yamdu

    95%
    Yamdu ranks higher in 6/6 features

    Task Management

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    10.0
    100%
    1 Rating

    Gantt Charts

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    9.0
    90%
    1 Rating

    Scheduling

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    10.0
    100%
    1 Rating

    Team Collaboration

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    10.0
    100%
    1 Rating

    Document Management

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    9.0
    90%
    1 Rating

    Mobile Access

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    9.0
    90%
    1 Rating

    Attribute Ratings

    • Yamdu is rated higher in 2 areas: Likelihood to Recommend, Support Rating

    Likelihood to Recommend

    8.4

    Digital.ai Agility

    84%
    9 Ratings
    10.0

    Yamdu

    100%
    1 Rating

    Support Rating

    9.2

    Digital.ai Agility

    92%
    4 Ratings
    10.0

    Yamdu

    100%
    1 Rating

    Likelihood to Recommend

    Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)

    Scenarios where it works well: 1) Retros can be very well facilitated & notes/action items
    can be captured against the sprint. 2) Product Owner can effectively track the story
    progress with all the test-cases, design etc. 3) Being good scaling support, it provides good visibility
    across multiple teams, programs and agile portfolios, providing a centralized
    environment where all our stakeholders can easily work together regardless of location. 4) It provides easy tracking all of your epics,
    stories, themes, defects, tasks, tests and issues 5) I like its intuitive UI as for moving stories
    around, burning hours. 6) It allows top leadership to visualize
    and report their strategic plans, giving all stakeholders the relevant data
    that they need to stay dedicated to the project priorities. 7) It can be easily integrated with slack
    so for few teams we used slack for collaboration Scenarios where it did not work well: 1) Test Management need improvement in
    terms of tracking tests, team had hard time tracking regression test cases. 2) Version one comes with lot of features like
    Rally but here we don’t get customizations which is there in Jira where from workflow
    to issue everything can be customized based on your team/program/portfolio
    requirements. 3) Lot of navigation to access basic
    stuff. Example I want to go to bug attachment , there are lt of clicks &
    navigation need to do which should be pretty straightforward I feel.
    Read full review

    Yamdu

    In my opinion Yamdu is suitable for both small and large projects as it has a wide and customized environment.
    Read full review

    Pros

    Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)

    • Automated saving of changes, no records can be lost because all items are saved in real-time.
    • The watch function, optional but beneficial when managing multiple teams or projects.
    Read full review

    Yamdu

    • Customized production schedule and easy management.
    • Total financial control of the project in all areas.
    Read full review

    Cons

    Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)

    • Saving of changes is inconsistent. Sometimes the changes appear to save automatically and other times the user needs to click the "Apply" button. Until the user is familiar with when this needs to happen, work can easily be lost.
    • This may be a setup configuration issue, but it would be good to be able to set the default team when creating stories. Too often stories are created and the user forgets to enter the team and they need to search the entire database for the story that was just created.
    Read full review

    Yamdu

    • More specific financial management reports.
    • Creation of some instant messaging software for the team.
    Read full review

    Pricing Details

    Digital.ai Agility

    Starting Price

    Editions & Modules

    Digital.ai Agility editions and modules pricing
    EditionModules

    Footnotes

      Offerings

      Free Trial
      Free/Freemium Version
      Premium Consulting/Integration Services

      Entry-level set up fee?

      No setup fee

      Additional Details

      Yamdu

      Starting Price

      $7 per project

      Editions & Modules

      Yamdu editions and modules pricing
      EditionModules
      Yamdu Student$7.001
      Yamdu Starter$15.002
      Yamdu Advanced$39.003
      Yamdu Episodic$69.004
      Yamdu University$99.005
      Yamdu Start-Up$99.006
      Yamdu Company$199.007
      Yamdu Studio$699.008

      Footnotes

      1. per project
      2. per project
      3. per project
      4. per project
      5. per university
      6. per company
      7. per company
      8. per company

      Offerings

      Free Trial
      Free/Freemium Version
      Premium Consulting/Integration Services

      Entry-level set up fee?

      No setup fee

      Additional Details

      Support Rating

      Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)

      VersionOne provides outstanding training. They have Product Owner training that I recommend every Product Owner attend. They have scrum master training and other agile training that was well worth the money paid because it made the teams more productive. And the support for the tool is incredible. These people live and breathe Agile and are evangelists and enthusiasts.
      Read full review

      Yamdu

      This is one of Yamdu's strongest points.
      Read full review

      Alternatives Considered

      Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)

      Basecamp functions much differently from Version One and serves a different purpose, so it's kind of like comparing apples and oranges. However, both V1 and Basecamp have their pros and cons. V1 makes it easier to manage Agile processes, but Basecamp is more user-friendly and can be used for broader purposes. At our organization, we utilize both products. V1 is what we use to manage processes internally, and Basecamp is what we use to manage client-facing processes. If our organization wasn't Agile, I would prefer to use Basecamp for all project management (internal and client-facing), and have done so at previous organizations for which I've worked
      Read full review

      Yamdu

      I was recommended by a friend in the production area and the product was not evaluated before I did everything with normal tools like Excel, etc.
      Read full review

      Return on Investment

      Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)

      • I came in near the end of our use of VersionOne (we are migrating to Jira), and I don't operate or think at the business return (ROI) level. I'm not the one to comment on this!
      • I suspect that V1 added much clarity to the prioritization of work, and added visibility across entire teams. So I assume that it had a positive impact on returns.
      Read full review

      Yamdu

      • Positive impact, better management of the entire production process.
      • Negative impact, clearly shows all the flaws in the process that my company has to improve.
      Read full review

      Screenshots

      Add comparison