Docket, Inc. vs. Hugo - Meeting Notes Software

Docket software is well suited in the modern SaaS industry where we have clients on the call to see the demonstration of the products and it also it makes easier for us to walk through the demonstration of the software, the meeting, and video/audio quality are better when compared to some of them available in the market.

Incentivized

I think it's important to understand that software recommendations do not come up casually during conversations with your friends so recommending it with no agenda is off the table. However, if someone asks me for tips on note-taking during calls my first priority would be OneNote because it just has more functionality and is usually built-in, meaning you don't have to search for anything online. The second priority would be Hugo though.

• Easy to use
• Easy to set up
• Good functionality

Incentivized

• Hugo - Meeting Notes Software removes ambiguity and uncertainty from discussions.
• Participants from both inside and outside the organization can work together on agendas and minutes before and after the meeting.
• The Hugo extension for Google Calendar may be used to arrange and follow up on meetings, both online and offline, as part of your Google calendar.

Incentivized

• Tracking of the assigned calendars across the team.
• Sometimes less bit of integration with Microsoft mails.
• Multiple calendars profiles can be added.

Incentivized

• Platform is pretty simple and we use basic; there are probably many features we have not yet realized exist
• I don't think many other firms are using it, so can't use across the profession

Incentivized

Docket is easier to work with and also navigation is quite easy when compared to the other software that I have used so far, my team also is trying this software and they feel the integration is quite easy with the existing calendar and making it a very straightforward way of working.

Incentivized

The quality of support is better with Hugo. Ease of use is also good with Hugo than when compared to Coda. Hugo met our requirements, so decided to choose it over Coda. It is easier to set up Hugo when compared to Coda and it saves a lot of time.

Incentivized

• Increase productivity greatly
• We see greater satisfaction from the meetings among the users
• Decreased amount and length of meetings due to increase productivity.

Incentivized

• Closing acton logs to set clearer paths to business goals
• Serves as good reference tool for important conversations that impact business objectives
• Fosters easy collaboration within the organization

Incentivized