EasyQA vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
EasyQA
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
EasyQA is a Test Management Tool that was created by the custom mobile app and web development shop, ThinkMobile, to help users improve software quality and simplify various quality assurance processes. EasyQA is crafted for QAs, Developers, and PMs. The goal of EasyQA is to provide users with multiple possibilities to manage the testing process, run up to 50 projects simultaneously, manage 3 different platforms within one project and have 50 organizations in one account. EasyQA…N/A
Visual Studio Test Professional
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
An add-on for the Visual Studio IDE, Visual Studio Test Professional subscription helps teams drive quality and speed. It includes test case management and collaboration features that streamline quality control and support continuous delivery.
$2,169
for the first year (renews at $869)
Pricing
EasyQAVisual Studio Test Professional
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
EasyQAVisual Studio Test Professional
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup Fee$10 Contact usNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
EasyQAVisual Studio Test Professional
Features
EasyQAVisual Studio Test Professional
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
EasyQA
6.8
1 Ratings
17% below category average
Visual Studio Test Professional
-
Ratings
Centralized test management6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Manage test hosts and schedules7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Map tests to user stories7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Test execution reporting8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Defect management6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
EasyQAVisual Studio Test Professional
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.3 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.3 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
EasyQAVisual Studio Test Professional
Likelihood to Recommend
6.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(15 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(10 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(10 ratings)
User Testimonials
EasyQAVisual Studio Test Professional
Likelihood to Recommend
ThinkMobiles
The complexity of the product is too high, so even changes to a single feature impact many other functionalities. Using EasyQA has helped us create multiple test cases where the feature may have its effects and test and track the progress on as many related functionalities as possible.
Read full review
Microsoft
It would be well suited if we used it with Azure DevOps as we can effortlessly integrate the test cases and even stories or tasks to stay on track with our work. Those test cases can even be reused across multiple projects. Using any other third-party tools, such as Jira, can be less appropriate, as it's not a Microsoft tool, and its capabilities will be limited.
Read full review
Pros
ThinkMobiles
  • Creation of test cases for new features
  • Management of created bugs
  • Bug tracking and analysis
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Availability of the desktop client or the web interface. The web interface being the favorite and providing a better experience.
  • It enables you to write unit tests with so much ease.
  • Allows the recording and repeating of manual tests
  • It can be set up for collaboration.
Read full review
Cons
ThinkMobiles
  • In my experience, they provide poor support
  • The application is still a bit buggy
Read full review
Microsoft
  • The user community of the Visual Studio Test product is weak. For instant problems with this product, it is necessary to quickly reach the source of the error.
  • Licence fees need to be more reasonable. License prices need to be reduced so that they can easily compete with free testing tools.
Read full review
Usability
ThinkMobiles
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
It is very usable if you are familiar with Visual Studio to begin with. If you are new to the interface, it can be a long ramp up period for Testers not used to the GUI. There is always the web option which seems to be more intuitive for many Testers.
Read full review
Support Rating
ThinkMobiles
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Visual Studio Test Professional is backed up by the full support of the Microsoft Corporation. That means twenty-four/seven customer support by quality, highly-trained professionals who understand every possible issue that you have experienced before. They are nice, efficient, and highly professional. I recommend them.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
ThinkMobiles
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
The visual Studio Test tool is faster than other tools. Since the development and testing processes are in one tool, it is more profitable in terms of cost. It is more inconvenient to write a test case in DevOps.
Read full review
Return on Investment
ThinkMobiles
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
  • One of the positive ROIs of Visual Studios is the fact that it makes producing our work at a quick rate, things like Intellisense make our work get produced at a much higher rate which is good for our return of investment.
  • Testing by the developers has increased by 23%, we now take the time to actually test our product before we send it to our QA people.
  • I am not aware of any negative ROI aspects to our company that have been found.
Read full review
ScreenShots

EasyQA Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of