EditPlus vs. TextPad vs. UltraEdit

Edit+ is well suited for basic tasks like using it as a to-do list or writing basic scripts or using it for simple programs that aren't too long or complex.

Incentivized

I like the macro feature for transforming text. For example, taking a CSV file of data and quickly turning it into a set of SQL "insert" statements. Also, useful for this is the find/replace feature using regular expressions such as taking a URL QueryString and breaking all the parameters into separate lines and perhaps sorting them for review.

Incentivized

UltraEdit is well suited for editing very large files. The macro editor is very powerful and easy to use. If one needs a quick-to-open text file editor, you will find UltraEdit much too slow to load. Compared to some free editors on the market, the basic individual user license is quite expensive.

Incentivized

• Decent overall text editor for any programming language you want to use.
• Can customize your layout/color scheme to fit your needs.

Incentivized

• Quick to load.
• Very fast searching algorithm for finding and replacing text.
• Macros are very useful.

Incentivized

• Search and replace in files that are not open
• Cut and paste columns - I don't know any other program that can do this!
• Is a super fast and powerful text editor.

Incentivized

• Keep it simple, fast and easy
• Change without need is wasteful
• It's already perfect, sheesh...

Incentivized

• I would like a "delete non-bookmarked lines" so I can skip the "invert bookmarks" step.
• The "Compare Text Files" could be streamlined to compare text in 2 tabs without going through the save steps.

Incentivized

• The color coding capacity is rudimentary and keyword based only. A good color coding mechanism should allow context.
• With the latest versions, the top menu has a lot of big icons and has a user-friendly kind of look which impacts the actual text window. Most users don't fancy pretty icons and like efficiency over pretty buttons.

Incentivized

As a program UltraEdit comes ready to use out of the box and requires very little setup for it to be extremely useful. It's flexibility among a wide array of tasks and files makes it a go-to for all our troubleshooting and data viewing needs. Timely updates and great support.

Incentivized

I never had to use support, so I can't answer this. I would hope that it is good though.

Incentivized

Have never needed support, not once. So giving them a 10 for the fact that their product is so good that we've never needed it.

Incentivized

Not well supported, lacks functionality other editors have.

Incentivized

When you want to quickly edit a file, TextPad starts up quickly and has many features over Microsoft Notepad. Visual Studio Code is an alternative in that it is full-featured and will edit text files but is slower at startup. I prefer the macro feature in TextPad due to its simplicity.

Incentivized

I have evaluated Notepad++ as an alternative to UltraEdit. In some cases, such as loading time, Notepad++ is a superior product. However, in terms of editing existing macros, and editing very large text files UltraEdit is a much better product.

Incentivized

• I have not been involved in that aspect. I am just a user.

Incentivized

• Made my job easier, so I would say it had a positive return on investment. Especially for it's overall low cost.

Incentivized

• Its ease of use and functionality make it fast and reliable which saves my designers time.
• Its simplicity makes it fast and easy to train new users.
• UE's guidance features make it a great tool with a good ROI.

Incentivized